Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nunez on Bartiromo: Clinton State Dept confidantes passed oppo research to FBI for investigation
FoxNews ^ | April 22, 2018 | Me

Posted on 04/22/2018 7:35:01 AM PDT by Brilliant

Did anyone else just watch Nunez on Bartiromos show? He was talking about how the FBIs Trump investigation got started. Apparently the evidence shows that Clinton associates Blumenthal and Shear gave opposition research on Trump to Clinton confidantes in the State Dept who then passed it onto the FBI to serve as information to begin an investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: US: California; US: Connecticut; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: andrewmccabe; blumenthal; california; christopherwray; codyshearer; connecticut; devinnunes; fisa; jamesclapper; jamescomey; johnbrennan; jonathanwiner; leonpanetta; lisabarsoomian; mariabartiromo; michaelcohen; nenez; perjury; richardblumenthal; rodrosenstein; russia; sidneyblumenthal; steeledossier; susanrice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-196 next last
To: rolling_stone; Liz; bitt
... why did hildabeast pay perkins coie $12mm for the dossier when they only paid british spook chrstopher steele $160,000?

where did the rest of the $11,840,000 go?.....

my question, why hasn't the Mueller team raided Perkins-Coie and seized all their records?

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

haven't seen any updates on efforts to subpoena Perkins Coie bank records.

That would show where all the money was spread around: spies, spooks, pols, news readers, MSM, SM, MM

101 posted on 04/22/2018 10:34:49 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

I have replied to what you have written. If you want a reply to something other than what you have written, then you will have to post that.


102 posted on 04/22/2018 10:35:51 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: randita
-- Isn't there a state dept. watchdog, as Horowitz is to the DOJ? --

Yes, there is.

103 posted on 04/22/2018 10:36:17 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/14/sessions-to-face-uranium-one-clinton-foundation-recusal-questions-on-hill.html


104 posted on 04/22/2018 10:37:19 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

No, you’ve been slipperier than James Comey. Sessions is as Sessions does. You can argue for a solid decade that he’s investigating Hillary. Until you produce even the tiniest smidgen of evidence it’s all a pro-Sessions pipe dream.


105 posted on 04/22/2018 10:38:26 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

“It is unclear what Sessions can directly do regarding appointment of a special counsel. At his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in January, the former senator seemingly recused himself from any investigations involving Clinton.”

And Jeff’s subsequent actions have proved he meant it.


106 posted on 04/22/2018 10:41:29 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

You’re trying to put words in my mouth. Please quote me saying that Sessions is investigating Clinton.

The closest thing I see is the foxnews article I linked for you about Uranium One.

There are several false claims you have made in this thread about me, and I have asked to to show us a quote from me saying those things. So far, you have failed to do so for any of them.


107 posted on 04/22/2018 10:42:56 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

Oh puke. Your article is from 2017. Nice try.


108 posted on 04/22/2018 10:43:48 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

So you’re still not acknowledging Sessions’ recusal statement.


109 posted on 04/22/2018 10:44:03 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Nothing is gained by repeating their lies.

You are comparing apples and oranges. The claim that Republicans started the GPS Dossier is, of course, false. However, McSlime ADMITS he brought the dossier to Comey. . .McSlime hands are dirty AND I want to know who on the Republican side gave McSlime the green light. Look, we can put every Democrat on the face of the earth in jail. .but if we maintain a blind eye to the snakes because they have an "R" next to their name. . we won't accomplish a thing.

That being said. . .yes, LOCK HER UP!!!

110 posted on 04/22/2018 10:44:27 AM PDT by McBuff (To be, rather than to seem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

You have been hair-splitting as if your life depended on it to argue that Sessions ***could*** investigate Hillary. My point is that what do all your incessant legalistic deflections matter if Sessions is ACTING as if he’s recused from all things Hillary.


111 posted on 04/22/2018 10:46:45 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

It is after his recusal statement. That is the important thing, and it shows that he directed DOJ activities related to Clinton that do not relate to the campaign.

That, in turn, shows that his written recusal statement is what he is following, rather than his Senate testimony promising to recuse himself.


112 posted on 04/22/2018 10:47:04 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

See post 111.


113 posted on 04/22/2018 10:47:19 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
No, the phrase in the letter would make the recusal more expansive.

Confirmation hearing:

Written statement:

The phrase from the letter, "matters related in any way" is far more extensive.

Sessions is recused, from his own words and deeds, in matters related "any way" to the campaigns.

114 posted on 04/22/2018 10:49:53 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
No, the phrase in the letter would make the recusal more expansive.

Confirmation hearing:

Written statement:

The phrase from the letter, "matters related in any way" is far more extensive.

Sessions is recused, from his own words and deeds, in matters related "any way" to the campaigns.

115 posted on 04/22/2018 10:50:29 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: thinden
where did the rest of the $11,840,000 go?.....

It has been awhile since these figures have bounced around. I read ~$1M went to Fusion GPS. The rest probably went for FEC compliance type stuff.

116 posted on 04/22/2018 10:50:40 AM PDT by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

He directed DOJ personnel to look into Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation. But because that doesn’t fit your agenda, you deflect from it.

It is impossible to reason with someone who does that. It’s impossible to reason with someone who misrepresents whast I say. I’m done with you.

Buh bye.


117 posted on 04/22/2018 10:52:27 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
From your link...

He's recused, Grace.

118 posted on 04/22/2018 10:53:16 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Not sure what you think I wrote that disagrees with that.


119 posted on 04/22/2018 10:53:37 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

It was a time-wasting punt. Sessions directed some DOJ insiders to ‘evaluate,’ Uranium1. That was in 2017. It’s April 2018 and nothing has happened. The DOJ insiders did what they were supposed to do.


120 posted on 04/22/2018 10:54:55 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson