Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Lawmakers Make Criminal Referral on Clinton, Comey, Lynch to DOJ on Steele Dossier
SaraACarter.com ^ | 4/18/2018 | Sara Carter

Posted on 04/18/2018 10:24:53 AM PDT by b4its2late

Obama officials and FBI embattled agents also targeted for possible violations of federal law

Congressional lawmakers made a criminal referral Wednesday to the Department of Justice Attorney General Jeff Sessions against former senior-level Obama administration officials, including employees of the FBI connected with the unverified dossier alleging collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, as well as those involved in the warrants used to spy on a former Trump campaign volunteer, this reporter has learned. The lawmakers also made a criminal referral on former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and threats made by her DOJ against the FBI informant, who provided the bureau with information on the Russian nuclear industry and the approval in 2010 to sell roughly 20 percent of American uranium mining assets to Russia.

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee member Rep. Ron DeSantis, R-Florida, along with nine other colleagues sent the letter Wednesday to Sessions and FBI Director Christopher Wray criminally referring former FBI Director James Comey, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe for their involvement in the investigations into President Trump and alleged violations of federal law. FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and his paramour FBI lawyer Lisa Page, whose anti-Trump text messages obtained by the DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, were also included in the referral.

“We write to refer the following individuals for investigation of potential violation(s) of federal statutes,” states the letter obtained by this reporter. “In doing so, we are especially mindful of the dissimilar degrees of zealousness that has marked the investigations into Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, respectively. Because we believe that those in positions of high authority should be treated the same as every other American, we want to be sure that the potential violations of law outlined below are vetted appropriately.”

The criminal referral also raises significant concerns regarding the Steele dossier, and the “presentation of false and/or unverified information to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in connection with the former Trump aide Carter Page warrant application to conduct surveillance through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).” Page worked as a volunteer advisor for the Trump campaign and the information in the dossier was used in bulk by the FBI to obtain the warrants to spy on him.

“Accordingly, we refer to DOJ all DOJ and FBI personnel responsible for signing the Carter Page warrant application that contained unverified and/or false information for possible violation(s) of 18 USC 242 and 18 USC 1505 and 1515b,” the criminal referral states. It refers to a letter drafted by House Intelligence Committee ChairmanDevin Nunes to Sessions this March.

The lawmakers noted that Comey “engaged in questionable conduct vis-à-vis President Donald Trump,” and referred to an article reported by The New York Times, in May 2017, which highlighted memos leaked by Comey to a friend that was given to the paper. In the criminal referral letter, the lawmakers state that “Comey wrote memoranda detailing alleged conversations between himself and President Trump, creating ‘a paper trail’ for ‘documenting what he perceived as the president’s improper efforts to influence a continuing investigation.’

The New York Times article reports that Comey “created similar memos – including some that are classified – about every phone call and meeting he had with the president,” the letter states.

The criminal referral also notes a Jan. 3, 2018, letter to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein from Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Charles Grassley, where committee staff reviewed the memoranda created by Comey in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility due to the classified nature of the majority of the memos; of the seven memos, four were marked classified at the “SECRET” or “CONFIDENTIAL” levels.

Comey, whose book A Higher Loyalty, released this week, argued that his memos were personal reflections about his meetings and conversations with Trump, but admitted that some contained classified material. According to FBI policy, however, the bureau forbids any agent from releasing classified information regarding ongoing investigations or sensitive operations without prior written permission. The bureau also mandates that all records created during official duties are considered to be government property.

“In light of the fact that four of the seven memos were classified, it would appear that former Director Comey leaked classified information when sharing these memos with Professor Richman. Accordingly, we refer James Comey to DOJ for potential violation(s) of 18 USC 641, 18 USC 793, and 18 USC 1924(a),” the letter states.

The congressional members also are referring former presidential candidate Clinton for her role in the dossier, assembled by former British spy Christopher Steele, who was hired by cutout embattled research firm Fusion GPS. After months of investigations by Congress, it was eventually discovered that the dossier was paid for by the Hillary Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee. However, the campaign did not reveal that they had allocated money to pay for the research on their disclosure forms, according to congressional members and news reports.

“A lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid Washington firm Fusion GPS to conduct research that led to the Steele dossier, according to an October 24, 2017, report in The Washington Post,” the letter states. ” Accordingly, for disguising payments to Fusion GPS on mandatory disclosures to the Federal Election Commission, we refer Hillary Clinton to DOJ for potential violation(s) of 52 USC 30121 and 52 USC 30101.”

Lynch was referred after concerns were made regarding her decision to threaten with reprisal the former FBI informant, William Douglas Campbell, who first came forward in 2016 with insight into the sale of the Canadian firm Uranium One, which controlled nearly 20 percent of U.S. uranium mining interests in the United States, as previously reported.

Campbell had filed a lawsuit in Maryland federal court in 2016 against the Russian companies he was employed with and which he had kept tabs on for the FBI. He was asking for the return of the money he had to launder out of his own paychecks and had sent a Freedom of Information Act request to the DOJ for information on his case. After the DOJ received the FOIA request and the lawsuit was filed, his lawyers were advised by personnel from the Justice Department that prosecutors in the Fraud Section of the Justice Department under Lynch, demanded the withdrawal the lawsuit. According to a letter written by Campbell’s previous attorney, the DOJ threatened to destroy Campbell’s reputation and prosecute him for violating a non-disclosure agreement he had signed with the FBI.

The criminal referral on Lynch is investigating her for “potential violation(s) of 18 USC 1505 and 1515b,” according to the letter.

As for Strzok and Page, the two FBI employees at the center of the Congressional investigations, the lawmakers seek the criminal referral based on the pairs “interference in the Hillary Clinton investigation regarding her use of a personal email server,” as reported.

The lawmakers point to a Jan. 22, The Wall Street Journal article regarding the Justice Department’s second release of text exchanges between Strzok and Page, and revealed that the texts “show the FBI also eliminated evidence that Mrs. Clinton compromised high-level communications.”

“The report provides the following alarming specifics, among others: ‘Mr. Strzok texts Ms. Page to tell her that, in fact, senior officials had decided to water down the reference to President Obama to ‘another senior government official,” the criminal referral states referring to the article.

Other recent documents obtained by congressional investigators also suggest possible coordination by Obama White House officials, the CIA and the FBI into the investigation into President Donald Trump’s campaign. According to those documents, the senior Obama officials used unsubstantiated evidence to launch allegations in the media that the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia during the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

The documents also reveal that former Senate majority leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, sent a letter on Aug. 29, 2016, asking former FBI Director James Comey to investigate the allegations, which were presented to him by then CIA Director John Brennan. Brennan had briefed Reid privately days earlier on the counterintelligence investigation and documents suggest Reid was also staying in close touch with Comey over the issues, as reported.

BREAKING: Will have more when I join @seanhannity on radio this afternoon


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: billpriestap; california; carterpage; comey; davidlaufman; devinnunes; dossier; fisa; fisagate; florida; hillary; jamesclapper; jamescomey; johnbrennan; leonpanetta; lisabarsoomian; michaelcohen; obamagate; q; qanon; rodrosenstein; rondesantis; sessions; steeledossier; susanrice; trumpdossier; trumprussia; trustsessions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last
To: b4its2late

Sessions will sit on it until 2025.


81 posted on 04/18/2018 1:14:43 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: romanesq
AG Sessions has been all over it..

Like a mcgoo, driving.

82 posted on 04/18/2018 1:53:58 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Electric Graffiti

I still say Sessions voted for DJones on Dec. 12, 2017.


83 posted on 04/18/2018 2:01:29 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

When the indictments come; you will move on quietly as if the dumb insults never happened. That’s the internets. Bitch, complain, move on.


84 posted on 04/18/2018 2:06:49 PM PDT by romanesq (For George Soros so loved the world, he gave us Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: corlorde

Bookmark


85 posted on 04/18/2018 2:09:30 PM PDT by corlorde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: romanesq
When the indictments come; you will move on quietly as if the dumb insults never happened. That’s the internets. Bitch, complain, move on.

No. It's your assumption that there will be indictments, that is dumb.

What is worth complaining about util we get indictments, if we ever get indictments, are the fact that Jeff Sessions is recused, and Deep Stater Rosenstein is in charge.

Not to complain about those two absurd facts is asinine.

86 posted on 04/18/2018 2:11:50 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Yawn. How about some indictments.


87 posted on 04/18/2018 2:13:03 PM PDT by Professional Engineer (This account has been banned or suspended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southnsoul
"If anyone deserves a Pulitzer, it’s her."

And if anyone needs a food taster, it's Sara.

88 posted on 04/18/2018 2:21:39 PM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Ooh! An investigation!


89 posted on 04/18/2018 2:57:52 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Bmk


90 posted on 04/18/2018 2:59:19 PM PDT by Popman (Wisdom is not what you know about the world but how well you know God. 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

About time.

5.56mm


91 posted on 04/18/2018 3:05:14 PM PDT by M Kehoe (THIS SPACE FOR RENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

“No. It’s your assumption that there will be indictments, that is dumb.

What is worth complaining about util we get indictments, if we ever get indictments, are the fact that Jeff Sessions is recused, and Deep Stater Rosenstein is in charge.

Not to complain about those two absurd facts is asinine.”

What’s asinine is the constant whining by the same group of malcontents ignoring the obvious that a grand jury is already empaneled and AG Sessions appointed John Huber to work with the DOJ IG Michael Horowitz last year!

Prosecutors are not brought in to file paper. Their job is to prosecute.


92 posted on 04/18/2018 3:17:51 PM PDT by romanesq (For George Soros so loved the world, he gave us Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: romanesq
What’s asinine is the constant whining by the same group of malcontents ignoring the obvious that a grand jury is already empaneled and AG Sessions appointed John Huber to work with the DOJ IG Michael Horowitz last year!

The only known grand jury on such matters is in Maryland to indict one NON Deep Stater on the perfieral of Uranium One. There is no evidence of any other grand jury at this time. There is still no evidence of a grand jury in Hiland's Arkansas and Huber's job as outlined in the Session/Boyd letters is not to conduct a grand jury. Read the letters! And both US Attorneys answer to Rod Rosenstein.

Prosecutors are not brought in to file paper. Their job is to prosecute.

Prosecutors are assigned non prosecutorial tasks at the DOJ. Latest case in point is US Attorney Lauch in Illinois assigned by Sessions to do exactly that, push papers.

You're blaming posters here for simply complaining about the facts.

If you want to live in fantasy land, that's your problem.

93 posted on 04/18/2018 4:31:57 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

“The only known grand jury on such matters is in...”

Incorrect. There is an active grand jury. It’s been referenced repeatedly. The Deep State knows and is in a panic over it. They keep attempting to distract from the activity there and create other narratives of attack.

Grand juries work in secret. You don’t know about the details. You’re not supposed to know. But the references have been continuous since AG Sessions revealed John Huber to the public in his interview with Shannon Bream.

“Prosecutors are assigned non prosecutorial tasks at the DOJ.”

Did John Huber tell you that’s what he’s doing? Doubtful.


94 posted on 04/18/2018 4:47:32 PM PDT by romanesq (For George Soros so loved the world, he gave us Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Principled

i think it will. it’s just more of the increasing tide of noise that will expose it all.

it’s coming and it will be large

///////////////////////////////

If we were living in a Constitutional Republic and not a police state socialist democracy, this tactic and the endless delays would not be necessary. Unfortunately the bureaucratic state, owned by the uniparty, is in power and it is almost impossible to obtain justice under these circumstances.
I agree with you there will most likely be action and it will be sudden and massive. The deep state coup continues and the entrenched marxists and globalists are fighting for their lives with all the power at their disposal. Unfortunately we can’t rely on the legal system to perform properly, so things must be coordinated so that we can finish what we start. The IG report, the congressional committees, the prosecutor assigned by the AG, are all moving in coordination to create an ironclad scenario where justice can prevail. I pray we succeed, our future as a nation depends on it.


95 posted on 04/18/2018 5:05:55 PM PDT by photodawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: romanesq
Incorrect. There is an active grand jury. It’s been referenced repeatedly. The Deep State knows and is in a panic over it. They keep attempting to distract from the activity there and create other narratives of attack.

I've only seen poorly sourced references to there being a Grand Jury. Saying that something has "been referenced repeatedly", doesn't make that something well sourced. You are certainly free to cite your references.

The Deep State knows and is in a panic over it.

You are making things up again. Anybody can make things up and make it part of their argue. I could say that the Deep State wants us to think that there is a grand jury because they don't want us complaining about Sessions and Rosenstein. But that's pure speculation as was your last comment.

Prosecutors are assigned non prosecutorial tasks at the DOJ.

Did John Huber tell you that’s what he’s doing? Doubtful.

Read the Sessions/Boyd letters that task Huber. He's not prosecuting. His tasks as are outlined in the letters are to evaluate prosecutorial resources that are currently being used and to make recommendations.

He can recommend to add prosecutorial resources to some matters, he can recommend the opening of new matters and he can recommend a special prosecutor for so,e matters.

Those are his assigned tasks as listed in the letters.

96 posted on 04/18/2018 5:41:52 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: romanesq

where is this grand jury and what area is under their jurisdiction?


97 posted on 04/18/2018 5:49:36 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

“where is this grand jury and what area is under their jurisdiction?”

The area under their jurisdiction is the United States of America.

It’s on a need to know basis and you don’t need to know since you ain’t sitting on the grand jury.


98 posted on 04/18/2018 7:03:37 PM PDT by romanesq (For George Soros so loved the world, he gave us Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: romanesq

.........“where is this grand jury and what area is under their jurisdiction?”

The area under their jurisdiction is the United States of America.

It’s on a need to know basis and you don’t need to know since you ain’t sitting on the grand jury.......

federal grand juries should be in the District where the crime is alleged to have happened.

15,000 sealed indictments and not one leak?

..One exception to the rule of grand jury secrecy concerns witnesses. The federal rule governing grand jury secrecy places no restriction on witnesses, and “individuals called as witnesses may disclose whatever they wish to the media.” (U.S. v. Lovecchio). ..


99 posted on 04/18/2018 8:46:38 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

“15,000 sealed indictments and not one leak?

..One exception to the rule of grand jury secrecy concerns witnesses. The federal rule governing grand jury secrecy places no restriction on witnesses, and “individuals called as witnesses may disclose whatever they wish to the media.” (U.S. v. Lovecchio). ..”

It’s speculation to conclude there are thousands of sealed indictments related to the work of AG Sessions and his team on a number of fronts under investigation.

Nothing leaked about US Attorney John Huber and he’s been on the job working for AG Sessions since last year.

The DNC Media was shocked that they didn’t know a thing about it. But he’s been working since last fall with the DOJ IG Michael Horowitz and he’s the one with the power to indict/prosecute.

Anyone who thinks this will all end with nothing is sadly mistaken. As President Trump said about the Pubbies, “I will teach them how to win.”

Too many people here suffer from not winning syndrome. Now, they think it’ll never happen. They do cry and whine quite a bit while attacking the Silent Executioner, the Hon. AG Jeff Sessions.

They’re going to find out. They all will.


100 posted on 04/19/2018 11:23:39 AM PDT by romanesq (For George Soros so loved the world, he gave us Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson