Click
Posted on 04/01/2018 4:01:17 PM PDT by ethom
After months of the liberal media ridiculing Trump over his claim that Obama spied on him during the election, Trump finally got vindication this week. America learned the truth on Tuesday that Obama did in fact unconstitutionally spy on Trump throughout the presidential election, leaving Barack Obama with his pants down yet again.
Now former intelligence officer Lt. Col Tony Shaffer just revealed that Obama’s wiretapping was not only a federal crime, but says that the results of this investigation will likely result in Obama being brought up on FELONY CHARGES. The colonel’s dire prediction about Obama’s future is sending shock-waves through the black hearts of liberals all across America today, as it’s now thrown a monkey wrench into Obama’s plans to stage his “political comeback” this fall.
In a recent interview with Trending Today USA, Lt. Col Tony Shaffer called ‘Obamagate’ an “order of magnitude” even bigger than the Watergate scandal because the incident included “using nation-state resources for purposes of political gain.”
When asked if Obama could be arrested for violating the law, he said that it would be the “first time a former president could be indicted for a felony.”
“…I think it is very possible that he acted outside of the scope of his duties, responsibilities and authorities to turn the resources of a nation-state on a candidate. This is, as I’ve said before, soviet-dictator level wrongdoing,” he added.
Shaffer said that Obama using government resources to spy on Trump was for the sole purpose of getting Hillary into office, as Obama hoped the wiretapping would produce enough “dirt” on Trump to sabotage his presidential run.
Given Shaffer’s lengthy military career, his rise to the top of the American intelligence community, and his current senior position at the prestigious London Center for Policy Research, his prediction about Obama shouldn’t be scoffed at. Being brought up on felony charges would completely destroy Obama’s plan of making his political comeback this year, as he’d be trying to figure out a way to keep himself out of prison instead of spending his hours obsessing with ways to bring Trump down.
The Hill reported on just how extensive Obama’s spying truly was, as this unconstitutional move wasn’t just limited to listening in on Trump’s calls. They reported:
If these reports are accurate, it means U.S. intelligence agencies secretly surveilled at least a half dozen Trump associates. And those are just the ones we know about.
Besides Manafort, the officials include former Trump advisers Carter Page and Michael Flynn. Last week, we discovered multiple Trump “transition officials” were “incidentally” captured during government surveillance of a foreign official. We know this because former Obama adviser Susan Rice reportedly admitted “unmasking,” or asking to know the identities of, the officials. Spying on U.S. citizens is considered so sensitive, their names are supposed to be hidden or “masked,” even inside the government, to protect their privacy.
In May, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates acknowledged they, too, reviewed communications of political figures, secretly collected under President Obama.
Can’t get Hillary but we’ll get Obama?
Uh-Huh.
This will be 911 times 1000
Oct. 16, 2006 Robert Mueller’s FBI Thugs raided the home of Rep. Curt Weldon’s daughter who had a Lobbing Firm that worked with the “Russian” Energy Corp. Three weeks later Joe Sestak won the election over Curt Weldon. The FBI never pressed any charges because their raid had succeeded it’s goal. Curt Weldon was holding hearings on “Able Danger” that Lt. Col. Tony Schaffer was in charge of, and the 911 Cover-up Commission was trying to hide. Looks like the Mueller-Comey Russian plot has been used before.
“If charges are filed against Obama, there will be riots like we have not seen before”
I know I don’t care about what the reaction would be. We either have a rule of law or we don’t.
excellent info regarding stzok/page implicating Obummer
Admiral Mike Rogers was on top of the outrageously illegal, seditionous and treasonous Obama wiretapping of Hillary’s and his political opponents since 2015 at the latest.
As a whitehat, he had to slowly build counter-intel in order to wreck zero’s project.
From Tony’s lips to God’s ear!
BUMP Jacob Allen!
Trump will be hit with a felony indictment before Obama is.
I know I don’t care about what the reaction would be.
The will hanging out of those choppers, flame-throwing at all of us on their way out, once the exorcism takes hold.
Obama was never eligible to be President.
He is not a natural born citizen.
If indicted that will all come out in the wash.
It’s possible, that even then, he would skate. He has pigment protection.
I can’t believe that people wonder if Obama was aware of laws being broken. The same media that will blame President Trump personally for every little incident, protected obama from any blame. The usual excuse from obama, whenever a crisis arose, that he first heard about it when he saw it on the news, was never challenged by the media. In fact, they presented obama as a victim. So, even though many people were conditioned to think obama was faultless, we know that whatever has been confirmed about obamas role in the wiretapping, it’s just the tip of the iceberg. Whether or not he ever faces charges, if the truth is ever fully revealed, he will be known as the most corrupt president ever, by far.
Hmmm...
Your question supposes a president can commit treason by violating national security statutes but has immunity if such behavior is regarded as "official action".
It is clear the Constitution does not expressly provide language on the issue, but some have found an inference the president has immunity where the charges are not related to the office.
So, without trading theories:
Let's suppose there is a reasonably good reason to believe the president has committed treason, but the political inclination of the House and Senate is to not impeach and convict.
Is the nation to fail because by its inaction the House and Senate become parties to the crime? Is it possible the founders, all wise men, intended that we should develop and rely on an inference the president is the one man who is above the law, especially after they had just rid themselves of King George III?
I think the better view is that there is no immunity if the charges relate to violations of federal statutes with felony exposure. The proper vehicle for such purpose may be a federal grand jury. The process can be handled by the president's legal team with no extraordinary inconvenience to the president. If found guilty, then I&P him.
The media is the deep state.
That’s why he is untouchable.
The GOP would be exposed as culpable in the Kenyanesian Usurpation.
Ping for future use...
________________________
In all sincerity, what does this mean? Are you telling us that you will read this later? If so, why would I care? If not, please explain.
(it’s Easter, and I am not looking for a fight, I’ve always wondered what PING meant)
As was his use of the IRS to attack conservatives and Christians.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.