The Left is showing its cards.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
To: reaganaut1
Well hells bells, if John Paul Stevens says we oughta, then I guess we oughta!
2 posted on
03/27/2018 5:37:42 AM PDT by
COBOL2Java
(The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen)
To: reaganaut1
“In 1939 the Supreme Court unanimously held that Congress could prohibit the possession of a sawed-off shotgun because that weapon had no reasonable relation to the preservation or efficiency of a “well regulated militia.”
But an M-16 does.
To: reaganaut1
Normally one would try not to say something like this but...
Yo JPS. Drop dead.
4 posted on
03/27/2018 5:39:45 AM PDT by
OKSooner
To: reaganaut1
“The Left is showing its cards.”
Holding them “close to the vest” is no longer required.
Good.
5 posted on
03/27/2018 5:39:45 AM PDT by
moovova
To: reaganaut1
This is insanity. There are regular insurrections and insurgencies against governments, gangs terrorizing communities, and threats individually to self, family, or friends.
Those who would counsel disarming ourselves are first ignorant of History, next ignorant of current events and third probably members of some despotism that wants to overthrow this government.
7 posted on
03/27/2018 5:40:10 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
To: reaganaut1
how wrong can this guy be... good thing he has nothing to do with the US Constitution.
8 posted on
03/27/2018 5:40:30 AM PDT by
teeman8r
(Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
To: reaganaut1
“Cocaine is a hell of a drug” — Rick James.
I have no idea what Stevens’ excuse is. Maybe senility.
9 posted on
03/27/2018 5:40:33 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(I'm still somewhat onboard but very disappointed. Not so much "Winning" lately.)
To: reaganaut1
These demonstrations demand our respect. No they don’t. The demonstrators should be openly mocked at every opportunity.
10 posted on
03/27/2018 5:41:22 AM PDT by
TADSLOS
(Alex Jones isnÂ’t quite the wing nut now, all things considered.)
To: reaganaut1
No. The Second Amendment protects our right to defend ourselves.
11 posted on
03/27/2018 5:41:30 AM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: reaganaut1
Repeal John Paul Stevens.
Keep pushing, you stinking liberal sycophants.
I can already see a groundswell beginning.
The cop forums are full of those policemen that have very vocally stated that they would stand with the people if confiscation began.
And the level of violence that some folks are willing to escalate to can be found on any of the pro-gun forums and comment sections.
We are looking at another Civil War, folks.
Mark my words.
12 posted on
03/27/2018 5:41:44 AM PDT by
OldSmaj
(The only thing washed on a filthy liberal is their damned brains.)
To: reaganaut1
That means no more security bodyguards, no more Secret Service and the police become unarmed as well. And who the hell is John Paul Stevens anyway?
13 posted on
03/27/2018 5:42:26 AM PDT by
New Jersey Realist
( (Be Nice To Your Kids. They Will Pick Out Your Nursing Home))
To: reaganaut1
Former Justice Stevens is 97. I wonder if he actually wrote this piece.
14 posted on
03/27/2018 5:42:52 AM PDT by
Huntress
("Politicians exploit economic illiteracy." -“Wearing the hijab is 100 percent my choWalter William)
To: reaganaut1
This commie writes in the commie NY TIMES that
"These demonstrations demand our respect."
JOHN PAUL STEVENS was a US Sumpreme Court justice.
Who has the mentality of a cretin.
SENILE?
To: reaganaut1
The most amazing part of this article is that Stevens is still alive.
16 posted on
03/27/2018 5:43:44 AM PDT by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: reaganaut1
He's lying about history and the law. SCOTUS is a failed institution.
The concern about standing armies was addressed with financing limitations, two years.
"Militia" is the able-bodied public. The point of the 2nd amendment is to allow the people to persist in their ability to control, and if necessary, overthrow the government. The people had just thrown off the King, and were damn well determined to retain the ability to do so again.
17 posted on
03/27/2018 5:43:48 AM PDT by
Cboldt
To: reaganaut1
Kind of makes me curious.
Seems like they are not willing to wait it out much longer.
18 posted on
03/27/2018 5:43:55 AM PDT by
redgolum
To: reaganaut1
I say we test out his theory by Making it a Felony for any Officer of the Court to use, own, possess any Firearm, Ammunition or weapon.or have any person in their employ or employed on their behalf to be in possession of any firearm, ammunition or weapon.
19 posted on
03/27/2018 5:44:24 AM PDT by
eyeamok
(Tolerance: The virtue of having a belief in Nothing!)
To: reaganaut1
That support is a clear sign to lawmakers to enact legislation prohibiting civilian ownership of semiautomatic weapons Stupidity on public display again at the NYT. They no not what a "semiautomatic" weapon is.
To: reaganaut1
All fascist regimes prohibit the liberties embodied in our 1st and 2nd Amendments. JP Stevens knows this.
21 posted on
03/27/2018 5:45:10 AM PDT by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: reaganaut1
22 posted on
03/27/2018 5:45:19 AM PDT by
Doogle
(( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand....never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson