Posted on 03/25/2018 12:23:28 PM PDT by C19fan
"I’m going to start off by putting this price tag right here as a reminder for you guys to know how much Marco Rubio took for every student's life in Florida," Parkland survivor David Hogg says at #MarchForOurLives.
That is the horrifying moment that the anti-gun movement lost the chance of ever winning me over. David Hogg is emerging as a skinny young Robespierre, so filled with righteousness and certainty, and stone-cold purity.
(Excerpt) Read more at theamericanconservative.com ...
He talks as if he’s parroting back what someone told him to say.
= = = = = = = = =
Make that what someone/somebody PROGRAMMED him...
I believe you.
He’s a no talent dilettante with delusions of grandeur - just a nasty piece of work who couldn’t whip his weight in seat cushions. He’s all mouth and no guts whatsoever. He reeks of sickliness.
Balzac spelled it “Roberspierre.”
I’ve never seen anyone else spell it like that.
Camus was more interested in Robespierre’s lieutenant, Saint-Just. Now there was a fanatic.
He reminds me of Goebbels. Even looks like him.
Are we certain that young Master Hogg is even biologically male? That’s just the skinniest neck and torso holding up that unusually shaped head. Very ET-like.
History repeat. His face will be on tshirts 50+ years from now, worn by stupid youth.
Hogg and Zuckerburg will be breaking bread soon, I suspect.
“Sometimes I look at a Socialist — the intellectual, tract-writing type of Socialist, with his pullover, his fuzzy hair, and his Marxian quotation — and wonder what the devil his motive really is. It is often difficult to believe that it is a love of anybody, especially of the working class, from whom he is of all people the furthest removed…The truth is that, to many people calling themselves Socialists, revolution does not mean a movement of the masses with which they hope to associate themselves; it means a set of reforms which ‘we’, the clever ones, are going to impose upon ‘them’, the Lower Orders. On the other hand, it would be a mistake to regard the book-trained Socialist as a bloodless creature entirely incapable of emotion. Though seldom giving much evidence of affection for the exploited, he is perfectly capable of displaying hatred — a sort of queer, theoretical, vacuous hatred — against the exploiters. Hence the grand old Socialist sport of denouncing the bourgeoisie. It is strange how easily almost any Socialist writer can lash himself into frenzies of rage against the class to which, by birth or by adoption, he himself invariably belongs.”
Everyone needs to watch on YouTube the French TV miniseries on “The French Revolution”. It was released in 1989 to commemorate the 200th anniversary of that event. It’s very honest in its historical presentation. The French government got some great actors & actresses to participate such as Sam Neil as Lafayette and Jane Seymour as Marie Antoinette, etc. Now after that introduction to back up your point. When you watch it pay attention to the character development of Robespierre and pay particularly to Jean Paul Murat and Antoine Saint Just. They’re chilling you see in them Lenin, Mao, Kim Il Sung to Kim Jung Un, the ranting of every left wing malcontent and their hatred of people who just want to live their lives!
Watch its superb! Watch the one with English subtitled unless you know French.
Where is the evidence other than internet speculation?
He is like a simmering volcano, with his anger level at about 98 on a scale of 10.
Let’s hope the same fate befalls him as Robespierre...guillotined without trial.
Of course it is.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.