Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Austin bomber's violence didn't meet law enforcement definition of terrorism
cbsaustin ^ | Mar. 23, 2018 | Jordan Bontke

Posted on 03/24/2018 5:35:13 PM PDT by bgill

After listening to a recording bombing suspect Mark Conditt made a day before his death, Interim Austin Police Chief Brian Manley said he never mentioned anything about terrorism... Retired FBI agent Jim Ellis spoke to CBS Austin as to why investigators didn’t label Conditt’s violence as an act of terror. “When you use the word terrorism, it’s a shock word," he said. Ellis said law enforcement typically defines terrorism as the unlawful use of force or violence against people or places to intimidate a government or its citizens to further specific political or social objectives.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsaustin.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: austin; bomber; conditt; jimellis; joesdrunk; markconditt; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Oh, well, that clears that up nicely.
1 posted on 03/24/2018 5:35:13 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bgill

I remember A SCOTUS Justice, when deciding a pornography case, said, I can’t tell you what pornography is, but I know it when I see it.”
The same idea applies here. More Austin political correctness.


2 posted on 03/24/2018 5:38:55 PM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not Tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Law Enforcement is exactly right in this instance.


3 posted on 03/24/2018 5:38:56 PM PDT by Az Joe (Gloria in excelsis Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

No, you are wrong. The definition of terrorism is as given in the article.

By your definition a wife who shoots her husband is a terrorist. You are wrong.


4 posted on 03/24/2018 5:40:03 PM PDT by Az Joe (Gloria in excelsis Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bgill

What this had to do with 9/11, I have no idea!


5 posted on 03/24/2018 5:40:11 PM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

The guy was a mad bomber.

He bombed because he was crazed.


6 posted on 03/24/2018 5:40:29 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe

We will have to disagree, Joe.


7 posted on 03/24/2018 5:41:14 PM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not Tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bgill

A narrow definition of terror is as the police stated, i.e., there is some intended political or social objective that is being pursued. A broader definition is that terror is random violence which induces terror in the citizenry, but which has no specific objective in mind.


8 posted on 03/24/2018 5:50:39 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

No manifesto, yet....


9 posted on 03/24/2018 5:50:44 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bgill

He was a lib. Its social protest, man.

Which is why Austin police weren’t more proactive in stopping him.


10 posted on 03/24/2018 5:50:44 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

He did it for a goof.


11 posted on 03/24/2018 5:54:36 PM PDT by Salvavida (The Missouri citizen's militia sends its regards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill
Leftist would want certain speech to be considered terrorism, this sets the bar at a more realistic level.

12 posted on 03/24/2018 6:05:20 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

If you just want to kill some people you shoot or stab them. If you plant bombs around the city you are getting off on inflicting terror.

He was a terrorist, just not an ideologically driven one.


13 posted on 03/24/2018 6:09:50 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation has ended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

I for one am glad they are sticking to the precise definition of “terrorism”. Now we just have to wait for the department to be accused of racism.


14 posted on 03/24/2018 6:11:40 PM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

It was certainly terror for the victims.


15 posted on 03/24/2018 6:11:53 PM PDT by TADSLOS (Alex Jones isnÂ’t quite the wing nut now, all things considered.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe

Yep. But the word is bandy about so much that people forget that words do have meanings that are not so loosey goosey.


16 posted on 03/24/2018 6:12:46 PM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bgill

They haven’t released the bombers confession or text of the confession, so I’m going with a cover up of a failed FBI operation to start a race war or a Travis County wannabee FBI operation.


17 posted on 03/24/2018 6:25:53 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Start using cash and checks or the elite class and bankers will make "cashless" the norm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Terrorism is a “shock word”, so we can’t use it anymore. How about we call it a boo-boo?


18 posted on 03/24/2018 6:38:19 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

“He was a lib. Its social protest, man.

Which is why Austin police weren’t more proactive in stopping him.”

Just another Broward County democrat jurisdiction.


19 posted on 03/24/2018 6:41:34 PM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Ergo, no one in Austin was terrified. Whew.


20 posted on 03/24/2018 6:44:59 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson