Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nobody Knows Anything About China: Including the Chinese Government
Foreign Policy ^ | March 21, 2018 | James Palmer

Posted on 03/22/2018 10:52:54 PM PDT by drop 50 and fire for effect

As a foreigner in China, you get used to hearing the retort “You don’t know China!” spat at you by locals. It’s usually a knee-jerk reaction to some uncomfortable modern issue or in defense of one of the many historical myths children in the mainland are taught as unshakeable facts about the world. But it’s also true. We don’t know China. Nor, however, do the Chinese — not even the government.

We don’t know China because, in ways that have generally not been acknowledged, virtually every piece of information issued from or about the country is unreliable, partial, or distorted. The sheer scale of the country, mixed with a regime of ever-growing censorship and a pervasive paranoia about sharing information, has crippled our ability to know China. Official data is repeatedly smoothed for both propaganda purposes and individual career ambitions. That goes as much for Chinese as it does for foreigners; access may sometimes be easier for Chinese citizens, but the costs of going after information can be even higher.

We don’t know the real figures for GDP growth, for example. GDP growth has long been one of the main criteria used to judge officials’ careers — as a result, the relevant data is warped at every level, since the folk reporting it are the same ones benefitting from it being high. If you add up the GDP figures issued by the provinces, the sum is 10 percent higher than the figure ultimately issued by the national government, which in itself is tweaked to hit politicized targets. Provincial governments have increasingly admitted to this in recent years, but the fakery has been going on for decades. We don’t know the extent of bad loans, routinely concealed by banks. We don’t know the makeup of most Chinese financial assets.

(Excerpt) Read more at foreignpolicy.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; closedsociety; communism; foreignpolicy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: kaehurowing; drop 50 and fire for effect

Drop 50’s post is correct. Its not about whether you are “free” to watch movies and eat McDonalds.

My understanding is that in China: the elephant in the room is its Maoist genocidal past. There is deep shame and suppressed guilt, and massive-massive coverup and denial of the collective hand society had in the Cultural Revolution — the dark effects of which linger and haunt China to this day.

The one child policy also has had traumatic effects especially for women who underwent enforced/forced abortions.

You are not even allowed to discuss tragedies and government crimes like Tianenmen Square massacre in the open.

And there is this intense pressure to keep up “modern” appearances even with all this historical, cultural baggage left unattended to.


21 posted on 03/23/2018 1:40:33 AM PDT by GoldenState_Rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
The article was a rip of Rumsfields theory ...

It may be Rumsfeld's theory now, but I recall hearing it enunciated decades before Rumsfeld's pronouncement of it.

22 posted on 03/23/2018 1:53:09 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: drop 50 and fire for effect
The Chinese economy is based on debt and cheap labor. They use the cheap labor to export consumer goods that the west, and especially the US, buys.

If the US market is closed to their goods they will not be able to pay their debt. Disaster awaits.

23 posted on 03/23/2018 2:18:57 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Islam delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

You are correct. Being embargoed with respect to the US market would devastate the Chinese economy. Just like being cut off from US oil shipments in 1941 was seen as a devastating move against the Japanese economy.

The question is, what would be the Chinese response?


24 posted on 03/23/2018 3:08:12 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The Party elite and top government officials get uncensored and candid reports average Chinese are not allowed to see.

The issue is not uncensored and candid, but rather accuracy. The Chinese system is layered and the path from the data provider at the local level to the General Secretary is long.

The argument from the author, which I believe has merit, is that given the cultural and bureaucratic environment, the raw data used is itself suspect.

As long as things are well in hand, the status quo will continue.

The Party may honestly believe (and it could be true) that things are well in hand, but there could be something out there, unseen by the available data, that is lurking, the classic "black swan."

To revisit your Soviet example, Gorbachev and the Politburo thought they had things well in hand, until 1989. Nobody in the Party, the government, their intelligence community, academia, the military, or in the Western equivalents foresaw just how quickly that house of cards would collapse.

25 posted on 03/23/2018 3:18:03 AM PDT by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I once heard a Navy flag officer wax eloquently about “perfect situational awareness” the idea that computers and sensors would provide a commander all the information they would ever need.

Then Iraq and Afghanistan happened, and Heisenberg b-—h slapped us (DoD) in the face and reminded us about reality.


26 posted on 03/23/2018 3:23:26 AM PDT by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
I don't know what the Chinese response will be, we will see.

Maybe they will refuse to ship any more cheap garbage to Walmart. I guess Walmart will have to source their cheap garbage somewhere else.

There is nothing that the west imports from China that we cannot make ourselves. Some point to Chinese production of rare earths as irreplaceable but they are wrong. There are many rare earth deposits in North America just waiting to be exploited.

China is a net importer of energy, specifically crude oil from the middle east. Cheap, plentiful energy is the engine of a modern economy. Cut it off or increase the price and China suffers immediately.

Furthermore Chinese cities are choking on air pollution and withering from a lack of clean, potable water. This is a huge public health problem that gets worse by the day.

27 posted on 03/23/2018 3:27:51 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Islam delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose
“Why are you shouting there, babblers, Why do you threaten Russia with anathemas?” —Alexandr Pushkin
28 posted on 03/23/2018 3:29:36 AM PDT by granada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
There are people on this very forum who simply refuse to believe that Japan had any justification even in their own minds to bomb Pearl Harbor.

History must be utterly mystifying to someone who thinks every event occurs in a vacuum, totally unrelated to any other event...

29 posted on 03/23/2018 3:38:44 AM PDT by null and void (The difference between the democrats and the GOPe is the GOPe has a smaller fire under the frog pot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: drop 50 and fire for effect

China isn’t the only country whose official government statistics can’t be trusted.

http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts


30 posted on 03/23/2018 4:40:26 AM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drop 50 and fire for effect

we do know there is a large population segment that is young and upwardly mobile and urban and tuned to the digital life. These youth are not fans of the old communist ways.

Xi must tread carefully to govern such an educated and ambitious segment. They are the future. They are the Chicaps.


31 posted on 03/23/2018 4:51:59 AM PDT by Thibodeaux (Long Live the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thibodeaux

“What do you think of China?” - President “Bobby’
“It’s full of Chinese.” - Chauncy Gardner.


32 posted on 03/23/2018 5:05:12 AM PDT by MGG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

“You can’t unbake a cake.”

- D. Rumsfeld


33 posted on 03/23/2018 5:46:32 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: drop 50 and fire for effect; All


Less Than $332 To Go!!
Even George Would Be Shocked
To Find Some FReepers
Haven't Donated To FR This Quarter!
Every Dollar Helps!!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


34 posted on 03/23/2018 5:48:17 AM PDT by musicman (The future is just a collection of successive nows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose
"...in China: the elephant in the room is its Maoist genocidal past. There is deep shame and suppressed guilt, and massive-massive coverup and denial of the collective hand society had in the Cultural Revolution ..."

I work with a lot of Chinese, including FOBs with little outside experience.

They have no idea of their own history. They are incredulous when I tell them basic facts about Chinese recent history.

The young ones don't know about Tienamen Square. The older ones are afraid, even here, to talk about it. It's like a survival mechanism, I think, but who knows, because ultimately they are inscrutable.

35 posted on 03/23/2018 5:52:10 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian
"...Chinese cities are choking on air pollution..."

Chinese smog is regularly sensed by California air quality monitors. It is that bad!

36 posted on 03/23/2018 6:01:26 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: null and void
There are people on this very forum who simply refuse to believe that Japan had any justification even in their own minds to bomb Pearl Harbor.

History must be utterly mystifying to someone who thinks every event occurs in a vacuum, totally unrelated to any other event..

Exactly. The Japanese leadership prior to and during the Second World War were masters of self-delusion and underestimating the response of their enemies.

Never underestimate the ability of people to fool themselves

37 posted on 03/23/2018 6:12:04 AM PDT by GreenLanternCorps (Hi! I'm the Dread Pirate Roberts! (TM) Ask about franchise opportunities in your area.arare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GreenLanternCorps

And never ever forget that we too are people.


38 posted on 03/23/2018 6:14:32 AM PDT by null and void (The difference between the democrats and the GOPe is the GOPe has a smaller fire under the frog pot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Thibodeaux
Xi must tread carefully to govern such an educated and ambitious segment. They are the future. They are the Chicaps.

But Xi won’t. And the new wealthy will revolt as the current unsustainable system starts to crumble. The US needs to wean ourselves off of the opium pipe that is cheap Chines goods before that happens. Trump’s tariffs may help in that.

39 posted on 03/23/2018 6:15:38 AM PDT by jdsteel (Americans are Dreamers too!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose

I disagree...... Xi sees the future. Hong Kong and the Pearl river Delta region are the future and they have hordes of youth flocking there.

I believe Xi took the lifetime job to begin weaning off the hardline communist stance. The hardline old timers are not the future. The wealth of his nation is already well into the process of transition from what is to something unknown influenced by the educated and upwardly mobile young people


40 posted on 03/23/2018 6:27:18 AM PDT by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson