Posted on 03/22/2018 8:08:33 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Why do the sexual radicals always win in the end? Why is “progress” always an ongoing slippery slope down to perdition? Can we ever go back to a saner culture again?
I will boycott each and every one of these crooked events if not the entire games.
They cannot admit the truth because it would then put all the nonsense of women being warriors in the military and equal to men as the fantasy that it is.
yeah, She learned her lesson at an Australian Open. Because she yapped about beating guys in the past and a drunk German tennis player ranked about 203 in the world beat both Serena and Venus.
https://www.theguardian.com/observer/osm/story/0,,543962,00.html
“Seeing the feminists go nuts” - when a female athlete dies when in competition with a male. I am a female who has always lauded the opportunities now for women in sports - but the ridiculous idea that women can compete with men - well so silly and so unscientific.
So, will this allow men gymnasts to compete against female like Simone Biles or Ally Raisman? It will be a circus if a man appears in a woman’s leotard.
International Olympic Committee to place new rules teams will be listed as he’s she’s it’s.
Outcome from upcoming Olympics: The best women athletes are all men. Feminists, counter intuitively, are thrilled.
Need to have events for men, women, and eunuchs... Don’t think the adadicktome class is ready to play yet.
This is occurring in many sports at all levels.
Female athletes crushed by ‘women who were once men’
http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/female-athletes-crushed-by-women-who-were-once-men/
McEnroe said Serena would be about #700 among the men. When the serves are coming over the net at over 120mph, it thins the herd without mercy.
I’m waiting for three things.
One, for a natural born woman to start in a non-Special Teams position in the NFL.
Two, for a natural born woman cheerleader to chuck one of the men cheerleaders high into the air at a ball game.
Three, for a natural born woman to start at third base in the Majors.
If men and women are equal.
All women sports are dead to me.
When I was racing at the velodrome in Blaine, MN, there was one transgender racing in the women’s category.
A man is still a man.
You can get Arrested for saying that here in Los Angeles, it is Hate Speech
Get over yourself. Don’t preach about your personal language constraints. Family jewels is as much euphemism and slang as is junk. What men use as a reference regarding their nads, nards, balls, package, danglies, baby makers among others, is up to them. Believe me, we hold them in higher regard than any woman ever could.
I gave my sons the same admonition, as if they had to be told.
Lighten up.
The book “The Sports Gene” isn’t about transgender athletes?
Thanks SeekAndFind.
"Junk" is a contemptuous anti-male term.
I think it is pathetic when males internalize the sexual self-contempt which is part of the larger societal anti-male ideology. I love and respect males, and I show it in my word choice.
Moreover, I regard sex itself as sacred. Sacred. And why? Because human beings are sacred, being bearers of the Divine Image, and sex is where humans come from.
Don't fault me for my principled resistance to the language poisoning which is all around us.
Why do the sexual radicals always win in the end?Better to ask "so far". We haven't reached the end.
Are you an English teacher? Maybe a psychoanalyst?
These terms are not new. Terms much more crude than this have been used since the beginning of time. Your ideology is yours.
Try some readings in what was then popular medieval writings about common men and privileged men of the time, some were clergy. They were very religious people and yet in common conversation they used terms that would be considered much more vulgar than “junk”.
You seem to assume that your views should be everyone’s and that those who don’t hold that view are poisoning the language or don’t hold the process and parts to be “divine”.
I have no “sexual self-contempt” and am completely secure in my life both temporal and spiritual.
I respect your right to have your point of view, but assigning sexual self-contempt and poisoning the language to those who use terms you don’t care for is a fault on your part.
Again, relax and take the proselytizing about language, religious views elsewhere.
Take it elsewhere?
I’m staying right here.
Respect yourself. Have a nice day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.