Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Tech Blogger Take on the Driverless Uber Crash
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | March 20, 2018 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 03/20/2018 1:20:31 PM PDT by Kaslin

RUSH: I mentioned that there’s the first known, first reported fatality involving an autonomously driven car. It was an Uber car. It was in Arizona. An Arizona pedestrian was killed. And because of this, Uber has halted testing of its autonomous vehicles all across North America, including San Francisco, Phoenix, Pittsburgh, Toronto, and a number of others have canceled theirs too.

And, you know, it’s fascinating, folks, to read liberal blogs about this. As you know, I spend time on the tech blogs. And the tech blogs are populated by young Millennial leftist journalists. And while they hate Uber for one reason, they don’t like the CEO and his mistreatment of women. But on the other hand they love Uber ’cause it’s high-tech, it’s software, it’s automatic driving investigations or experimentation.

Now, what happened in this case, there was a human being acting as backup, so there was a human being in the car. The car was tooling along, and a woman, according to the cops, darted out in front of the car from shadow. She was in a median between lanes, and she was not in a crosswalk. Now, that’s important because the software for one of these autonomously software driven cars, the crosswalk would have been programmed into it, and it would have had a sensor, sensitivity.

The woman darted out, and the investigators, the cops said it wouldn’t have mattered if the human being in the car had total control over it, this woman would have not been missed. Nobody would have had a reaction time quick enough to avoid hitting her. So the autonomous driving car has been exonerated from any blame in the death. So I’m reading my tech blogs on this and the tech blogs are urging caution, and let’s not rush to judgment. People die every day. We can’t be hasty in our condemnation of this marvelous new technology, driverless automobiles.

And all I could think of, if this woman had been killed by a gun, would these same tech bloggers have expressed caution and said let’s not rush to judgment here, or would they be on a tear today? And, in fact, one of the tech bloggers pointed out, “Hey, we gotta keep things in perspective. There are 50,000 people a year killed in automobile accidents,” as though this is just one of them. Isn’t any big deal. But wait a minute. I thought it was life that was precious.

So is it 50,000 people killed one way or another involving automobiles every year — well, we’ll look past that. I mean, we’re not gonna ban the wheel, and we’re not gonna ban the car, and we’re not gonna blame AAA. But let there be a gun involved, they throw all that out and they become banshees on the warpath to get rid of every gun in the world. And yet they’ll sit by and acknowledge 50,000 people, hundred people a week die in car crashes, so let’s keep this in perspective. And I thought, what a bunch of hypocrites.

‘Cause the point is, we cannot allow this masterful new technology, driverless automobiles, we cannot allow it to be sidetracked. We cannot allow it to be delayed. We cannot permit it being harmed in any way because it’s the future. So in certain cases, a random death here, a random death there, that’s just the cost of doing business. But when a gun’s involved, why, we gotta go out and get rid of the Second Amendment. We gotta disband the NRA. We gotta put the chairman of the NRA in jail. Amazing hypocrisy.

Anyway, the cops said it was not the car’s fault; it was not the software’s fault. It was the woman’s fault. She jumped out in front of the car. Nobody would have been able to stop it.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Kaslin

Wait till the car’s owner gets sued! Will be interesting!


21 posted on 03/20/2018 1:58:08 PM PDT by gr8eman (Since God has been banished from our classrooms, Satan has filled the void.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

“It was a homicide.”

_________________________________

Nope. Not even a homicide.

Homicide is the act of one human killing another...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide


22 posted on 03/20/2018 1:58:39 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

“But this accident or not, the tech is not remotely there yet”

The tech has gotten this far by being given a complete pass on all the rigorousness that automatic aircraft and train systems are forced to deal with. If they keep giving them a pass then we can expect a lot more deaths. The first automatic pilot type device was made in 1910. Yeah just a few years after planes were invented. But it was a LONG time before passenger jets were allowed to use ‘autoland’ capability. Doing something as an experiment is not the same as having it ready for prime time commercial use.


23 posted on 03/20/2018 1:59:38 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If Uber gets these cars working, who’s going to do the raping?


24 posted on 03/20/2018 1:59:39 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrBambaLaMamba

Then there motto would be “To Serve Mankind”.


25 posted on 03/20/2018 2:00:19 PM PDT by BipolarBob (If you're not hungry for God, you're probably full of yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Exactly


26 posted on 03/20/2018 2:03:27 PM PDT by Kaslin (Politicians are not born; they are excreted -Civilibus nati sunt; sunt excernitur. (Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ
Ookay, we have 37461 deaths last here for over 263 million cars on the road. For a few hundred driverless cars, we have a death. There are only 53 cities with driverless cars, and only a few actually on the road. If we say for dicussion that there are 263 driverless cars, that is three deaths per thousand driverless cars. Ramp up to half of cars on the road being driverless, you are talking about a MILLION deaths by driverless cars instead of the 37 thousand by human drivers.

I'll take the human driven cars with about one death per 10,000 cars instead of three for each thousand driverless cars.

27 posted on 03/20/2018 2:03:56 PM PDT by Reno89519 (Americans Are Dreamers, Too! No to Amnesty, Yes to Catch-and-Deport, and Yes to E-Verify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ
Tesla strikes another deal that shows it's about to turn the car insurance world upside down

The insurance market is already adjusting.

28 posted on 03/20/2018 2:06:17 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

You should have told him people get killed by cars too.


29 posted on 03/20/2018 2:06:46 PM PDT by Kaslin (Politicians are not born; they are excreted -Civilibus nati sunt; sunt excernitur. (Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

believe me, I agree and know.

I mean who doesn’t want to wind up decapitated because a semi crossed your path and the self driving system thought it was an overhead sign?

The tech is NOT THERE... watching these local mayors.. my own city’s included just let this crap go on blows my mind...

This tech is NOWHERE near ready for prime time, and yet GM is trying to get approval for a production mass produced model for next year! WTF!?!?!?


30 posted on 03/20/2018 2:07:43 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Homicide is the act of one human killing another...

Still not murder.

31 posted on 03/20/2018 2:08:19 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS
Police Say Uber Is Likely Not at Fault for Its Self-Driving Car Fatality in Arizona

The police chief of Tempe, Arizona, where a woman was struck and killed by one of Uber’s self-driving cars Sunday, says the ride-sharing company is likely not at fault for the accident, following a preliminary investigation.

Chief of Police Sylvia Moir told the San Francisco Chronicle on Monday that video footage taken from cameras equipped to the autonomous Volvo SUV potentially shift the blame to the victim herself, 49-year-old Elaine Herzberg, rather than the vehicle.

“It’s very clear it would have been difficult to avoid this collision in any kind of mode [autonomous or human-driven] based on how she came from the shadows right into the roadway,” Moir told the paper, adding that the incident occurred roughly 100 yards from a crosswalk. “It is dangerous to cross roadways in the evening hour when well-illuminated managed crosswalks are available,” she said.

Though the vehicle was operating in autonomous mode, a driver was present in the front seat. But Moir said there appears to be little he could have done to intervene before the crash.

“The driver said it was like a flash, the person walked out in front of them,” Moir said. “His first alert to the collision was the sound of the collision.”

According to the Chronicle, the preliminary investigation found the Uber car was driving at 38 mph in a 35 mph zone and did not attempt to brake. Herzberg is said to have abruptly walked from a center median into a lane with traffic. Police believe she may have been homeless.

Tempe police plan to work with investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to reach a conclusion about what happened, according to the Chronicle.

Sunday’s incident appears to be the first-ever self-driving car fatality involving a pedestrian.

32 posted on 03/20/2018 2:15:30 PM PDT by Kaslin (Politicians are not born; they are excreted -Civilibus nati sunt; sunt excernitur. (Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519
I am bothered that the police said initial review of the video saw her, saw her crossing the street. Then next they ran her down with out slowing or breaking.

I would have to see the video myself. I'm not for or against the Uber vehicle here. I just want to know what truly happened. When the police watched the video, they knew the lady had been hit, and were watching for her to appear on the video. So, yes, they could say they saw her and noted the car/driver did not attempt to stop.

Did the hardware sensors detect heat/object/motion near and/or in front of the vehicle? If they did, why didn't the software respond and stop the vehicle?

On top of that, why didn't the driver respond. I think maybe the driver saw her, took longer than normal to assess the car didn't see her, and by that time it was too late, whereas you or I, knowing we don't have tech to stop the car for us, would likely have reacted differently, and possibly much faster than the backup driver did, or apparently didn't.

33 posted on 03/20/2018 2:17:19 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

If it was homicide than than arrest the car. /s>


34 posted on 03/20/2018 2:19:26 PM PDT by Kaslin (Politicians are not born; they are excreted -Civilibus nati sunt; sunt excernitur. (Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No, she was supposedly walking her bicycle across the street and Uber’s admitted they have problems seeing bicyclists.

Ed


35 posted on 03/20/2018 2:21:27 PM PDT by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

So a person killed by a bomb wasn’t killed by homicide?

Isn’t this the same thing, an agent of a human killed a woman?

Ed


36 posted on 03/20/2018 2:23:13 PM PDT by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

“If the 20,000 die but there is no one who is liable?”


That’s goofy! With absurd assumptions, any conclusion would be possible.
Any insurance company would be happy to take the liability if told it has half the number of cases to deal with.


37 posted on 03/20/2018 2:24:35 PM PDT by miniTAX (au)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

They’ll introduce a law to give robot manufacturers immunity.

Robots will soon be driving better than nearly all humans but nothing is 100% perfect. It doesn’t make sense to run manufacturers into the ground if they are overall far safer than human drivers


38 posted on 03/20/2018 2:26:16 PM PDT by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Uber car was driving at 38 mph in a 35 mph zone and did not attempt to brake.

I looked at the intersection where this occurred on Google Maps Streetview. The posted speed limits that I could see in the area for the two roads mentioned are 45 MPH. One article I read said the collision occurred near the intersection of N. Mill Avenue and E. Curry Road. It also stated the vehicle was northbound, suggesting it was on Mill Avenue. According to streetview, the last speed limit sign I saw heading north on Mill Avenue before that intersection read 45 MPH.

The speed limit could have been changed since the streeview images were taken.

39 posted on 03/20/2018 2:32:13 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sir_Ed

So a person killed by a bomb wasn’t killed by homicide?

Isn’t this the same thing, an agent of a human killed a woman?

________________________________________________

Nope. Not even the same. Death by bombing puts all the blame on the bomber. If I were to assess blame here - 95% would go to the woman, 5 percent to the driver/autonomous Uber.


40 posted on 03/20/2018 2:42:03 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson