Has to go through appeals Court first. Totally procedural.
So, justice delayed, again. The comments indicate no one really understands the implications. Will have to go look for someone who does.
Obama ignores laws:
* congress doesn’t care
* courts don’t care
Trump follows laws:
* courts say he can’t
* congress doesn’t do anything (except complain that he’s following the laws)
We don’t need Hillary or the FBI or FISA details to see that we are no longer a country of laws.
Ugh. My third post because I’m incredulous about this.
EOs are not laws. A President has every right to undo a previous President’s EO.
Why is the judiciary even involved? Again, Trump has the worst legal advice in the history of mankind.
Agree with posters above; sounds like decision was procedural (jumping the 9th Circuit), not on merits of the case.
SCOTUS has original jurisdiction involving states suing DC.
Not sure, but suspect the case originated from a state.
Pretty slanted/misleading headline and lede in that story. The Supreme Court did not refuse the Trump Administration’s challenge; they refused to change the sequence of events normally involved in a legal challenge.
Who the hell is running this country. The President or a bunch of sorry-a$$ liberal judges.
This country used to have a justice system, to day all that is left is a bunch of legalistic liberal a$$es that take their instructions from the Workers Daily.
Clickbait headline. The court will hear the challenge and uphold presidential authority over this issue when it is ready to hear it. The court may be a little busy to intervene in a issue that Trump has twisted to and fro and that may have a political solution impending. But mostly the court is busy with a huge decision on government employee unions.
Procedural issue. They don’t consider it urgent enough to jump over the appeals court. The time for Scotus will be after the Nutty Ninth denies the appeal.
ARE they refusing to hear the case AHEAD of the Appellate Court? Or are they refusing to hear it at all?
Obama only wrote an EO. That isn’t written in stone. ANY president can reverse it.
????
This just seems SO f***ed up.
The alleged former president wrote an EO to bypass Congress and suspend (repeal) longstanding, valid law.
The current president put a sunset on the invalid EO.
One effing unelected appointed-for-life federal pissant judge says NO to the current president.
The president appeals to the SCOTUS, which then refuses to hear this OBVIOUS Constitutional question.
WTF am I missing here? Once again, the Constitution means squat.
(So much for that “leader of the free world” BS, huh? As long as the left can find a sympathetic judge, our president can’t take a sh*t on his own.)
You know what. Why not just leave DACA in place? Only 800,000 covered and law allows only certain age groups before a certain date. No path to citizenship. Trump should allow no discussion on immigration until the courts address the matter. The SC DID NOT rule on the constitutionality of the EO only that it wont hear the matter until the 9th circuit appeal.
A blow”? Puleeeze.
I’m not surprised the USSC did this. In the end, it doesn’t change much. DACA is over. It’s just a matter of the exact end date now.
My solution, impose a Presidential EO staying the Judicial decision and make them take it to the SCOTUS.
Their infringement is an open invitation to infringe on them.
Supreme court turns on the USA.
OK play their procedural game. Take it to the 9th and then take to the Supremes.
I’m hoping he lets this play out for a while, then issues his own EO to rid us of ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, UNETHICAL 0bama-induced DACA!
MAGA!
The fix is in. Whatever God has chosen Pres. Trump to do, it does not seem to be ending open borders.