I hope that a rebuttal to this reply is posted shortly.
It looks like obfuscation all over the place.
This thing is going to get easily picked apart.
Thank you.
thanks. If you will note: There is some text redacted where the corresponding reference # is not redacted.
Of those reference numbers, the corresponding source material was not redacted.
#7 on page 3; #12 page 4; #16 page 5; #27 page 6; #28 page 6; #31 page 7.
If the source material is available - pages 9-10, then we should be able to see what’s been redacted.
I’m not sure where or if I can start searchin for this stuff.
No need to read it. I did read to the point where the mentioned Carter Page - trying to paint him as a Russian Agent. Too bad, we already know that Page was used in a sting operation by the FBI to take down a Russian spy.
Page was an FBI plant to try and frame DJT. Period.