” The indictment says the Russians used PayPal to purchase ads on Facebook which were aimed at stoking political tensions before and after the election. “
How much money did they spend on this? I have heard before that “the Russians” bought $100,000 worth of ads. Hillary spent approximately $1 billion. These “Russians” should be sought after by the corporate world for effective use of ad dollars.
How many billions$ already spent on investigating to indict 13 supposedly “russian” internet trolls!!! LOL LOL LOL
This is a joke!
13, 13, thirteen!!!! whole internet Trolls control the USA elections! LOL
These indictments are a joke!They have nothing on Trump.
But no indictments against the DOJ,FBI, CIA etc for trying to frame Trump, spy on Trump etc.
What a crackerjack team!
We haven’t seen the likes of this since they collared the nfl jersey counterfeiters.
Did anyone in the 0bama campaign knowingly collude with foreign agents in his running for office in 2008?
https://www.thepostemail.com/2012/10/08/secret-service-must-investigate-obama-credit-card-fraud/
http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2012/04/04/obama-campaign-credit-card-verification/
One lefty talk show actually believes that Mueller will use threat of trial against the 13 Russians to turn on Trump. Question: Where will these trials be held St. Petersburg or Moscow? Idiots.
I’ve got about $300 bucks in my PayPal account.
Should I pull it out before Mueller goes full retard on them too?
It is a stretch to equate the purchase of advertising with trying to “influence” a U.S. election. Usually influence refers to more direct means of trying to steer an outcome in your favor. Such as bribery. Such as blackmail. Such as strong arm tactics to intimidate voters. Such as persuading people to drop out. You can’t have charges of influence without showing how it corrupted a person.
It does not mean purchasing advertising that a person only hopes will get a result. How would you prove that? How would the law decide just who had been influenced?
If it did mean that then people could be charged under the R.I.C.O for placing ads in certain circumstances. But I don’t believe that has ever happened. Does anyone else?
So did Holden McGroyn, Al Kaholik, and Phil McCracken
I thought Liberals think that Illegal Invaders have Constitutional Rights.
Wouldn’t that include these Russians having the Right to Free Speech?
And nobody asking why there’s no indictments for DNC perps who rigged their primaries....