Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SDShack

I will say this though, it seems the rate of decline of ground motion doesn’t seem to be dampened by distance down there, to the degree it is up here.

Another-words, at 100 miles there’s still a large magnitude shake.

Up here at 100 miles the quakes can been quite minimal.


27 posted on 02/16/2018 4:58:10 PM PST by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

We would have similar shock transmissions distances. We simply haven’t experienced a 7.2 recently...


31 posted on 02/16/2018 5:26:58 PM PST by TXnMA (MSM? No, thanks -- I prefer my news from the other end of the horse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
Another-words,

In other words...

36 posted on 02/16/2018 7:07:59 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

In the western usa where we get most of our quakes that is the case due to the shallow bedrock (mountains). However, the Great Madrid shake near the Mississippi in Missouri knocked some brick chimneys down in Boston in the late 1800’s!

When that one goes again it will be bad for us, as not a lot of our infrastructure in the midwest or east was designed for large quakes. I think they have done a lot of work on upgraded bridges across the Mississippi - but oil and gas pipelines that supply the east will be hard hit.


45 posted on 02/17/2018 1:00:34 AM PST by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson