Skip to comments.
Air Force expelled her in 1955 for being a lesbian Now at 90 she's getting an honorable discharge
Wapo via Sfgate ^
| January 18, 2018
| Kyle Swenson
Posted on 02/14/2018 8:28:34 AM PST by Salman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: TallahasseeConservative
21
posted on
02/14/2018 9:00:16 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Francis is a Nincompope.)
To: Buckeye McFrog
They probably figured Feh, shes 90, she wont collect Vet benefits for very long, and we dont want the PR blowback from saying no.
Wouldn’t she be owed back benefits though?
If they have decided she was wrongly discharged, she could have all sorts of back pay and benefits due.
I would think the decision opens a can of worms.
22
posted on
02/14/2018 9:04:43 AM PST
by
ltc8k6
To: al baby
I’m stealing that if you don’t mind.
23
posted on
02/14/2018 9:13:10 AM PST
by
tbpiper
To: Salman
Nobody has a “right” to an honourable discharge if they were breaking the rules in place.
24
posted on
02/14/2018 9:16:38 AM PST
by
Yashcheritsiy
(Bring back lords and kings)
To: ltc8k6
If they have decided she was wrongly discharged, she could have all sorts of back pay and benefits due. I would think the decision opens a can of worms.
The case would take years to wind through the Fed Courts. She does not have years.
To: Yashcheritsiy
This stupid. It deserves what it got.
26
posted on
02/14/2018 9:21:32 AM PST
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: TallahasseeConservative
27
posted on
02/14/2018 9:21:50 AM PST
by
Az Joe
(Gloria in excelsis Deo)
To: Az Joe
I do have a problem with it. She lied in order to enter the military back then. She had to - the question was in the enlistment papers.
The fact that she lied to get in makes her service less than honorable.
28
posted on
02/14/2018 9:34:56 AM PST
by
MortMan
(We are living in interesting times.)
To: Salman
If she’s having a discharge, she should have that looked at.
29
posted on
02/14/2018 9:35:51 AM PST
by
DannyTN
To: Salman
Stupid. So, can I get my speeding violation ex post facto dismissed because they raised the speed limit a few years later?
The law IN EFFECT at the time is just as valid.
30
posted on
02/14/2018 10:01:33 AM PST
by
fwdude
(History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
To: Az Joe
The big problem I have with this is that she enlisted under false pretenses to begin with. She lied about her sexual orientation outright. That most assuredly was a direct question during the enlistment process. We all remember that as well as bedwetting and talking in your sleep.
Why this is a big deal is many people lied about their age and served honorably even heroically in WWII, Korea and Viet Nam and the best they got was a general discharge. You want to fix something, fix that.
31
posted on
02/14/2018 10:05:07 AM PST
by
pfflier
To: Salman
That rug has some age on it.
To: pfflier
She paid the penalty for her lie by 62 years living with an Undesirable discharge. Time served
33
posted on
02/14/2018 10:13:10 AM PST
by
Az Joe
(Gloria in excelsis Deo)
To: MortMan
Then at least give her a General, under Honorable. 62 years living with an U.D. is punishment enough don’t you think?
34
posted on
02/14/2018 10:14:32 AM PST
by
Az Joe
(Gloria in excelsis Deo)
To: Az Joe
Does that allow her, assuming other qualification are met, to re-enlist in the armed services?
I wouldn't allow that.
35
posted on
02/14/2018 10:45:52 AM PST
by
fwdude
(History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
To: fwdude
36
posted on
02/14/2018 11:32:30 AM PST
by
Az Joe
(Gloria in excelsis Deo)
To: Salman
Apparently, the military is still firmly infiltrated by Leftists. Those that suffer from the homosexual disorder should not serve in the military. The military should not be normalizing disordered behavior.
37
posted on
02/14/2018 11:50:36 AM PST
by
DBeers
(The concept of peace in Islam requires not co-existence but submission.)
To: Buckeye McFrog
“The case would take years to wind through the Fed Courts. She does not have years.”
But there must be a lot of people in the same situation that this ruling would set precedent for?
A court could easily rule that they are due a lot of money since they were denied years of pay and a 20 year retirement possibility. Or full retirement a lot earlier in one of the RIF periods.
38
posted on
02/14/2018 11:58:44 AM PST
by
ltc8k6
To: Salman
A California woman kicked out of the military 60 years ago for being a lesbian has finally had her rights restored. And what RIGHTS would those be?
39
posted on
02/14/2018 1:59:40 PM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: robroys woman
Can you imagine the legal mayhem we would have today if slaves and slave owners from the pre-civil-war days were still alive?You left out the, "Oh... Wait..."
Who has to be alive?
There IS precedence...
Pope Stephen VI (896897), who had his predecessor Pope Formosus exhumed, tried, de-fingered, briefly reburied, and thrown in the Tiber.[1]
40
posted on
02/14/2018 2:02:27 PM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson