The True Biblical Response to Illegal Immigration and DREAMers

Townhall.com ^ | February 11, 2018 | Arthur Schaper

[Kaslin]

My Congressman Ted Lieu (D-Torrance) hosted another error-ridden town hall in Hermosa Beach last week. On immigration, he claimed to support two parts of President Trump’s proposed(?) plan: granting legal status to 1.8 million young illegals; and enhancing border security (although Lieu called the border wall “stupid”). He differed on ending chain migration and the diversity lottery. He quoted the Bible in his defense: “For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in.” (Matthew 25:35).

My response: “Then take them into your home!” Amnesty advocates preach their open-border morality, but don’t live up to it. Moreover, Jesus’ statement is directed toward individuals who welcomed strangers into their own homes voluntarily. Any form of amnesty imposed by our government is not voluntary.

My consternation with these Biblical arguments has grown since reading this article in the Christian Post, when evangelical leaders, many of whom I respect, pressured Congress to pass some kind of DREAM Act. Pastor Samuel Rodriguez of Sacramento, CA stated in a January press conference: "The wall is a physical object created by man. 800,000 human beings created in the image of God by God.” Walls are Biblical, affirmed by God in Scripture. In fact, God commands the construction of walls around Jerusalem both the Old (Nehemiah 1:1-7:3) and the New (Isaiah 54: 12; Ezekiel 42:20).

 In another letter to Congress, Evangelical leaders wrote: "Roughly 700,000 young people are poised to lose their right to work lawfully in the U.S., not to mention their dreams of a future in this country—the country they were brought to as children, without choice.” First of all, this country is not responsible for their parents’ crimes, which have harmed their children. Children should not be punished for the sins of their parents (cf. Jeremiah 31:29), but natural consequences remain. A mother breaks into my home, steals my car, and her children use the ill-gotten gains for good. I am still entitled to restoration of my property (Exodus 22). Illegal aliens are stealing this country’s space, resources, and wealth.

In response to these pro-enforcement arguments, preachers cite The New Covenant (Hebrews 8:10-012), which asserts that we are no longer under law, but under grace. However, grace is not arbitrary. Jesus died on a Cross for the sins of the world, the just for the unjust (1 John 2:2; 1 Peter 3:18). A payment must be rendered. Why should law-abiding citizens pay for lawbreakers?

If Christian leaders want to preach accurately on immigration, they should first acknowledge a few things:

1. Nations are God’s idea, not merely man’s construction, and rewarding illegal immigration harms nations. Genesis 11 reports God created multiple languages—and nations—to stop mankind from building the Tower of Babel. The dissolution of border security and national sovereignty are unholy gestures. To contend for amnesty based on a misplaced understanding of scripture is not tenable. There will come a time when every knee will bow, and every tongue confess Christ Jesus as Lord, but for now nation-states remain as part of God’s plan. Rampant amnesties only erode national boundaries.
2. Citizenship is a principle defended in the Bible. In the Old Testament, strangers were respected (Leviticus 19:34, Deuteronomy 10: 19), but they were expected to adopt all the customs of Israel, not retain their original cultural views (Numbers 15: 14-29). In the New Testament, Paul the apostle asserted his Roman citizenship to redress the abusive treatment of Roman soldiers (Acts 22:22-23:11). He also addressed his fellow Christians as “citizens of heaven” (Philippians 3:20, Colossians 3:5-16). Membership in a defined, national compact matters and should not be pushed aside. Many illegals in this country, especially DREAMers, are hell-bent on retaining and imposing a neo-pagan culture in this country, estranged and unsubmissive to our country’s constitutional rule and civic culture.
3. Christians are called to honor their rulers (and rules!) among the nations (1 Timothy 2:1-2; 1 Peter 2:17). To dismiss the authority of temporal rulers, especially on matters of immigration, is unholy and unwise.

Instead of championing amnesty, Christian leaders should reference the ideal immigrant: Ruth the Moabite. Unlike the 11 to 16 million illegal aliens in our country, per official tallies, Ruth did not break into her adoptive nation of Israel. She had a sponsor, her mother-in-law Naomi. There were other factors which Ruth obeyed, too (Ruth 1:16-17):

1. “For whither thou goest, I will go”: She would attend to Naomi, recognizing her place in her new country as based solely on the goodness of her mother-in-law. She did not enter into Israel as a political radical or busy-body.
2. “Where thou lodgest, I will lodge”: She would live with Naomi, not depending on someone else, particularly the state or taxpayers, to provide her housing. Her needs would come from her sponsor, not by force from other inhabitants in Israel.
3. “Your people will be my people”: This statement sums up assimilation perfectly. She pledged to become an Israelite. How often do our leaders today talk about the importance of immigrants adopting American customs, rather than demanding that we accommodate their foreign ways?
4. “Thy God [will be] my God.”: while our free society does not demand religious adherence to one creed, we should expect immigrants to embrace our cultural and moral values. For this reason, I am adamant against accepting adherents of Sharia Law, for example, or other religious sects which endanger life and property.
5. “Where thou diest, will I die, and there will I be buried”: Ruth pledged a complete break with her pagan country and culture. She refused to abandon her new country or identity.

At the very least, politicians and pastors should stop shaming the public by misusing Scripture. Christians should have a ready defense when amnesty advocates distort Scripture for selfish political ends. Every country has a right to strong borders, safe citizens, and a secured sovereignty. These are not un-Christian expectations in the slightest.

[Just mythoughts]

Follow the ‘money’, that is the democrats god... We the people are slaves to fake Christians... and these fakes have their hooks into our pockets. This is what the ‘social justice warriors’ are, bunch of lying crooks and thieves in the name of ‘jesus’.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/sep/24/catholic-church-collects-16-billion-in-us-contract/

Catholic Church collects $1.6 billion in U.S. contracts, grants since 2012
___________________________________________________________________________________

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/29/unholy-alliance-christian-charities-profit-1-billion-fed-program-resettle-refugees-40-percent-muslim/

Unholy Alliance: Christian Charities Profit from $1 Billion Fed Program to Resettle Refugees, 40 Percent Muslim
_______________________________________________________________________________

https://capitalresearch.org/article/refugee-resettlement-the-lucrative-business-of-serving-immigrants/

FOUNDATION WATCH

Refugee Resettlement: The lucrative business of serving immigrants
___________________________________________________________________________________

http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/religious-charities-profit-from-open-borders/

WND EXCLUSIVE
RELIGIOUS ‘CHARITIES’ PROFIT FROM OPEN BORDERS
Watchdogs ask: ‘Is it charity if government pays?’
Published: 07/16/2014 at 8:24 PM

________________________________________________________________________________

[EliRoom8]

Regarding illegals I’d have to go to Old Testament precedent. The Gibeonites dishonestly made entry into covenant with the Hebrews under Joshua in 9th Chapter. Once the ruse was discovered It was understood by both parties that those in this Canaanite tribe would strictly be a servile class (ie. cutters of wood and drawers of water), never on par with the Jews.

To see how Jesus regarded the citizenry of nearby nations, simply examine his “narrow” theology expressed at the Samaritan well or his discussion with the Syro-Phoenician woman. Definitely not first century pc.

[Nifster]

Don’t know who the oastors are this guy respects that preach open borders.....that is called cognitive dissonance

[Elsie]

I can see why...

"do not let strangers settle among you and worship their gods"

Doesn't seem to be an accurate quote from ANY bible translation.

At least Google® couldn't find any...

Got a reference for this missing LINK?

[jjotto]

Ezra 10 comes close.

[frnewsjunkie]

Whem I’ve seen ny dreamers on TV, they seem to be the type that would not be invited to stay. Loud, in-your-face, and think they are owed this.

No one is owed anything in this world.... work hard and be thankful... I don’t see the “thanks” in the dreamers.

[aimhigh]

Liberals quote scriptures, written to guide individuals, applying them to governments. Context matters, but not for liberals.

[Amish with an attitude]

U.S. Code › Title 8 › Chapter 12 › Subchapter II › Part VIII › § 1325 - Improper entry by alien

a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection; misrepresentation and concealment of facts

Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.

Romans 13:1-7

Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer. Therefore one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God’s wrath but also for the sake of conscience.

Case closed!

[wastoute]

I guess you missed the whole Baalam story.

[Elsie]

I’m waiting for the words surrounded by QUOTEs.

[wastoute]

So what did you get from the Balaam story?

[wastoute]

How can you read first and second Kings and not get this message?

[wastoute]

For that matter the central theme of almost all the prophets is about the danger of letting foreigners come into your land and continue to worship their gods. Seems to me, even the book of Esther demonstrates the danger of foreigners being allowed to worship their God.

[Elsie]

How can you read first and second Kings and not get this message?

I’m STILL waiting for the words surrounded by QUOTEs.

[wastoute]

“Foreign gods”.