Posted on 02/02/2018 11:58:54 AM PST by 11th_VA
The much talked-about GOP memo regarding the FBI and their conduct regarding a FISA warrant targeting former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page is finally out, and it’s a doozy. The memo confirmed rumors that Republicans were complaining about how the FBI omitted information from their warrant application regarding their reliance on the dossier compiled by Christopher Steele for Fusion GPS, paid for by the Democratic National Committee. While most of it wasn’t all that consequential, the latter part of the memo contained a bombshell about connections between the Justice Department and Fusion GPS.
The memo claims that the Steele dossier was “essential” to getting a FISA warrant, and cites FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe‘s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, where he allegedly said that no warrant would have been obtained against Page if not for the dossier. Now Democrats (and the FBI) have accused the GOP of taking parts out of context, but if this is true, it is especially troubling given that the source of the dossier was anti-Trump, and the DOJ knew it.
The memo asserts that Steele himself had admitted to then-Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr that he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected.” That bias was not disclosed to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). While I’ve discussed how the mere fact that the DNC paid for Steele’s research probably wouldn’t affect the validity of the FISA warrant, their knowledge that Steele himself had personal beef with Trump could be different. Especially if you add that on top of the claim that McCabe said no warrant would have been obtained against Page if not for the dossier.
In addition to this supposed bias on Steele’s part, the dossier has been widely reported as unverified. The DOJ itself has refused to address whether or not they’ve reached a final determination on whether they can confirm the details in the dossier. Therefore, the reliance on the dossier to get a FISA warrant is suspect, to put it mildly.
In United States v. Glover, the Seventh Circuit ruled that a warrant against a gang member was bad and had to be tossed out because the government didn’t disclose that their informant was in a rival gang and had lied in the past. While Steele had been a reliable FBI source in the past, if he had admitted bias against Trump, and the fact that his research was funded by Democrats trying to take down a rival campaign, should have been disclosed to the court.
Besides the allegations of bias, the fact that the DOJ won’t even say if they confirmed that the dossier was even truthful is much more worrisome. If the dossier’s contents indeed have not been verified, but the FBI relied on it anyway, then they themselves would have had to make a misrepresentation to suggest that it supported the necessary probable cause to get the warrant in the first place.
The memo also says that the FBI’s reliance on Steele’s research was not limited to just the dossier. Ohr’s wife was working for Fusion GPS at the time, and have him the company’s research, which Ohr then turned over to the FBI, according to the memo.
Basically, the memo paints a picture of a government law enforcement working hand in hand with the DNC in order to take down Donald Trump. No wonder the DOJ, FBI, and Democrats were so vehemently against it.
Now, the preemptive strike against the memo from its opponents is that it picks and chooses classified information to create an allegedly distorted picture of what happened. The FBI said in a statement:
With regard to the House Intelligence Committee’s memorandum, the FBI was provided a limited opportunity to review this memo the day before the committee voted to release it. As expressed during our initial review, we have grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.
Democrats have their own memo that they would like to release, but the GOP-controlled committee has not allowed it. It remains to be seen what, if any, information gets out to counter this narrative.
Maybe Trump's stature will likewise reverse ...
The “Schaffer memo” doesn’t even exist. If it did he would have leaked it.
Schaffer. Damn spellchecker.
Schiff. Twice, dammit.
The Democrat Schiff-Heads keep doubling down on the Pee-Pee Dossier saying it has at least some proof of Russian-Trump collusion. Well, OUT WITH IT! What is it?
Imagine the outcry if we had treated a gitmo prisoner like this.
This is unbelievable.
Drudge is calling this Obamagate, we should too.
Where is the decision to use this to wiretap Trump Tower, to sir-veil like Susan Rice
and Samantha Powers and other Obama people did, and unmasking?
I saw this as an omission.
Did this illegal process lead to Mueller nabbing Flynn and Manafort?
I watched Watergate, this is just getting started.
What did Obama know and when did he Know it.
Dem memo has to go through same process as R one. that takes time and they just cooked it up this week. i heard that it is working through that system. no one is denying them anything - although the R’s could vote to not release it when it gets to that point.
After all is said and done with this, and I wholeheartedly believe that NOT ONE PERSON will be held accountable for anything that may arise from any of it, I’d still like someone to say what it is, they think Donald Trump did wrong.
The Special Counsel/Independent Counsel law, is used when someone is believed to have committed a crime and it is believed that an investigation by the DoJ or FBI would/could be biased. Am I wrong about that, in some way? If not, what crime is alleged to have occurred by Donald J Trump, at any point during the campaign? Did he violate finance laws? Did he have people at polling places, going into voting booths and force them to cast votes?
Mueller was given the go-ahead to start a witch hunt with no crime, having occurred or alleged, other than DNC and Podesta emails being leaked by Assange. And, none of that was a crime, committed by Assange as he was provided those emails. Because, if I’m not mistaken, Assange/Wikileaks isn’t in the business of hacking, per se, they just publish information about govt abuses and programs used against the people.
Arrest someone for doing something with unnamed Russians!
I was thinking Brady v Maryland would be important as well. I don’t see how the FISA court, or any other court could possibly even consider a warrant or prosecution if Rosenstein and any of the other people involved in this are involved.
Imagine the outcry if Bush had treated Obama like this.
gaslighted President Trump.
.
Leaks went from wire taps...
to thugs in 'intelligence services'
then passed to corrupt members of the press...
AND last to Hollywood fools like 'Meathead'...working with Clapper and Brennan...
Yes, this was thought out and coordinated.
IMO the left is being set up. If they keep screaming that not enough has been released they may get their wish and ALL air the documentation might be released. FISA requests would be very interesting
Schitt, you mispronounced it three times! I would say the second “t” should not be there, as well...
At this point any warrant signed by Comey, McCabe, Page, Struck, Ohr or anyone else who swore an affidavit on this matter is now subject to review. A lot of criminal convictions are going to be overturned if their convictions were obtained by evidence obtained by any of these crooked cops.
Mueller doesn’t have a pot to pee pee in. His cases against the indicted are crapping out. If he goes to trial, he gets his butt handed to him.
Don’t leave out Barnes. He often slips through the cracks but is just as involved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.