To: Alberta's Child
"
These may seem contradictory, but they're not. Everyone involved here has to do their jobs, even if it seemingly puts them at odds with each other."
I'll take a bite from the apple, just what job is it your talking about.
1.) It's their job to try and CYA (Cover Your A$$ETS?)
2.) It's their job to simply deny any involvement?
3.) It's their job to make sure no one from the swamp goes to jail?
4.) I know their job is not to expose and or let out the truth!!!!!
So, Just to be clear, just what "job," are we talking about?
97 posted on
01/28/2018 1:42:58 PM PST by
Stanwood_Dave
("Testilying." Cop's lie, only while testifying, as taught in their respected Police Academy(s).)
To: Stanwood_Dave
If the U.S. Justice Department has open criminal cases against several defendants and the Nunes memo has references to evidence that relates to those cases, the DOJ has to look out for its own interests in treating all of that evidence in the context of the criminal cases -- even if they want the information to ultimately make its way into the public domain for other reasons.
105 posted on
01/28/2018 2:07:12 PM PST by
Alberta's Child
("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
To: Stanwood_Dave
In other words ... the DOJ can’t operate in a way that undermines their own cases.
106 posted on
01/28/2018 2:07:40 PM PST by
Alberta's Child
("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson