Posted on 01/25/2018 11:43:18 AM PST by markomalley
What happens when federal agencies accused of possible wrongdoing also control the alleged evidence against them? What happens when theyre the ones in charge of who inside their agencies or connected to them ultimately gets investigated and possibly charged?
Those questions are moving to the forefront as the facts play out in the investigations into our intelligence agencies surveillance activities.
There are two overarching issues.
First, theres the alleged improper use of politically-funded opposition research to justify secret warrants to spy on U.S. citizens for political purposes.
Second, if corruption is ultimately identified at high levels in our intel agencies, it would necessitate a re-examination of every case and issue the officials touched over the past decade or two under administrations of both parties.
This is why I think the concerns transcend typical party politics.
It touches everybody. Its potentially monumental.
This week, the FBI said it was unfair for the House Intelligence Committee not to provide its memo outlining alleged FBI abuses. The committee wrote the summary memo after reviewing classified government documents in the Trump-Russia probe.
The FBIs complaint carries a note of irony considering that the agency has notoriously stonewalled Congress. Even when finally agreeing to provide requested documents, the Department of Justice uses the documents classified nature to severely restrict who can see them even among members of Congress who possess the appropriate security clearance. Members who wish to view the documents must report to special locations during prescribed hours in the presence of Department of Justice minders who supervise them as theyre permitted to take handwritten notes only (you know, like the 1960s).
What most people dont know is that the FBI and Department of Justice already know exactly what Congressional investigators have flagged in the documents theyve reviewed, because three weeks ago the Senate Judiciary Committee sent its own summary memo to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Department of Justice Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. The committee also referred to the Department of Justice a recommendation for possible charges against the author of the political opposition research file, the so-called Trump dossier: Christopher Steele.
The head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Republican Charles Grassley co-authored the memo with fellow Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham. Grassley says its important for the public to see the unclassified portions of the memo. But unlike the House, which can release the memo on its own (and is taking steps to do so), Senate rules require permission from the Department of Justice the possibly offending agency approve or declassify the memo. And thats reached a snag.
According to Grassley, the FBI is blocking the release of the unclassified sections of the Senate memo by falsely claiming that they contain classified information.
It sure looks like a bureaucratic game of hide the ball, rather than a genuine concern about national security, said Grassley in a speech on the Senate floor yesterday.
Grassley also pointed out that agencies accused of possible improprieties are the ones controlling the information. Its the FBI who may have misused the unverified dossier opposition research, allegedly presenting it to a secret court as if it were verified intelligence.
[FBI] Director [James] Comey testified in 2017 that it was salacious and unverified, said Grassley. So, it was a collection of unverified opposition research funded by a political opponent in an election year. Would it be proper for the Obama administration or any administration to use something like that to authorize further investigation that intrudes on the privacy of people associated with its political opponents? That should bother civil libertarians of any political stripe.
Democrats and many in the media are taking the side of the intelligence community, calling the Republican efforts partisan. House Democrats are said to be writing a counter-memo.
We need to produce our own memo that lays out the actual facts and shows how the majority memo distorts the work of the FBI and the Department of Justice, said Rep. Adam Schiff, the lead Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee.
Meantime, the Department of Justice has officially warned the House Intelligence Committee not to release its memo. It's like the possible defendant in a criminal trial threatening prosecutors for having the audacity to reveal alleged evidence to the judge and jury.
This is the first time I can recall open government groups and many reporters joining in the argument to keep the information secret. They are strangely uncurious about alleged improprieties with implications of the worst kind: Stasi-like tactics used against Americans. Dont be irresponsible and reveal sources and methods, they plead.
As for me? I dont care what political stripes the alleged offenders wear or whose side theyre on. If their sources and methods are inappropriate, they should be fully exposed and stopped.
#DisbandTheFBI
I dont believe holding some leaders and other agents accountable tosses every prosecution into limbo.
Making excuses for going easy wont fly with me.
Go after these bastards!
There is nothing about being an FBI agent, or a top level FBI employee, that says you can get away with crimes.
You can’t. You will be held accountable.
There’s nothing in committing crimes that makes you special.
There’s nothing in breaking moral law that makes you unaccountable.
Imagine this headline: Apple's iPad division lashes out at Tim Cook and other Board Members.
This is a WAR between the Deep State global cabal and OUR DULY-ELECTED PRESIDENT. In other words, US!!!
What was the purpose of writing a “memo” to begin with?
And remember, you criminal agents and corrupt politicians still have the opportunity to admit your guilt and turn from your ways.
In the long term, doing this will go much better for you.
It’s simple: You either believe your government is always above suspicion and should have free reign or you don’t.
If, for some reason, the FBI/DOJ hide the ball tactics need to end, theyll have to pair up with the ATF and find some family or fringe group to besiege and then shoot-up as a distraction from their political shenanigans.
That would surely work yet again.
I am amazed and encouraged by this newfound respect for classified information. Why, there for a while I thought the Dems and their media tools would happily sell secrets on the street corner if they thought it would be to their political advantage. Now this selfless regard for the rules, well, I guess I was wrong.
Or not. Hypocritical, lying sumbitches. Release the memo NOW.
“Meantime, the Department of Justice has officially warned the House Intelligence Committee not to release its memo. It’s like the possible defendant in a criminal trial threatening prosecutors for having the audacity to reveal alleged evidence to the judge and jury.”
They are scared to death!!
There hasnt been this much grasping at straw since the flying monkeys tore the Scarecrow apart.
Bump! Release the memo!
NO! Should he tried, convicted, and incarcerated...or shot.
Is the FBI the most corrupt police organization in America? Close. What a disgrace.
#Don’tCallUsWeasels
The only solution here is to try and hang all involved.
On the Capitol Mall.
I am not being sarcastic or flippant.
It must be done.
It certainly is a war. Had they gotten away with it, subsequent rat presidents would refine their tactics and see to it that their designees, and their designees only, would be “elected.”
Their high crimes and felonies struck at the very heart of our sick republic. They must be punished, or it is over.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.