Posted on 01/16/2018 8:35:15 AM PST by fwdude
Two-and-a-half percent of American men ages 15-44 who identify as straight have had same-sex relations. That's according to a December study published in the journal Sociological Perspectives by Tony Silva and Rachel Bridges Whaley, which examined “the relationship between straight identification and nonsexual social factors among men who are attracted to men."
Colloquially, it's called “bud sex.”
Other recent articles and studies have pointed to a “bud sex” trend catching on in rural areas, particularly among white males. We conducted an unscientific search through hundreds of exciting propositions in the casual encounters section of Craig’s List to see whether these findings hold true in North Texas.
(Excerpt) Read more at dallasobserver.com ...
“Alrighty then....”
After I posted that I had to do a face palm.
That was my first thought, too. Also, pegged the Observer's office location, near Deep Elm which has turned all artsy-fartsy gay.
It’s a line from a TV show. British of course
Liberal street rag. Consider the source.
Hint: Men having sex with men are gay or bisexual. They are not straight.
Another hint: Men having sex with men are violating God’s laws and violating nature, not to mention gross.
All the evidence I’ve seen to support a genetic correlation seems to be contrived.
We have a greater incidence of sexual perversion of all kinds in our society.
Historically we see cultures go into this downward spiral and ultimately collapse.
Have we ever explored the genetic predisposition of people to be adulterers, for example? Of course not.
I will agree that most people who find themselves in any particular addictive behavior, feel as if there is no “choice” involved. And that may be true once a person has become an addict.
We can not help people who have these addictions when there is a culture of codependency that foster and encourages these addictions.
Those are Sooners. (ducking) (running)
This is believable among female undergraduates. It is a fantasy otherwise.
This is believable among female undergraduates. It is a fantasy otherwise.
The 50% in separated identical twins is a trifle more than contrived.
Walk in someone’s shoes before judging.
I have done many hours of research over a couple of years to educate myself on whether people are “born gay” and other similar topics and I agree with what you say.
I haven’t found anything that solidly supports the “born that way” claim that wasn’t refutable with other sources. The idea that they can’t help being that way is much easier to prove and accept because of the psychological nature of the abuse that most of them suffered from a very young age. Before they can emerge from the grip of same sex attraction or gender dysphoria, they must first understand why and how they got there. That often takes professional help and psychological counseling has become a mind field for such people due to all of the “gay affirming” therapists who want to take the person by the hand and lead them further in rather than help them find a way out.
The “born that way” myth combined with the whispered lies that they will die if they try to leave the lifestyle results in a lot of tortured souls who sink into addictions of all kinds as a means of escape. It is a cult.
Excellent analysis. All true.
The left, for the most part, hijacks things rather than building them. They hijack political parties, institutions like schools, courts, etc. They hijack corporations, and web services like “fact checking” sites, and news organizations. They want to hijack science and even nature itself, attempting to bend it to their will and beliefs. Liberalism is a psychosis.
It does not matter how many times socialism fails or how badly, liberals will still assume socialism can work if it is done correctly. Or they will call it something else. They will cite temporary financial successes based on the exploitation of limited resources that will eventually run dry. The outcome is eventually always like Venezuela, or worse.
They often lie about statistics and data in order to achieve an objective. That’s what they did to win Roe vs. Wade. Truth is irrelevant. The truth, in their minds, is whatever they want.
When it comes to sexual perversion, liberals start with the conclusion they want and work backward to find supporting evidence, filtering out anything that contradicts their beliefs, and then calls this science. Same with global warming.
If someone accuses me of being homophobic, I tell them I can’t help it because I was born that way.
I also point out that liberals are unscientific because they refuse to recognize the scientific fact that humans have two biological sexes. They refuse to accept the scientific fact that an unborn baby is a living human being.
They argue against protecting the lives of the unborn on the basis of location (inside the womb) and viability (ability to survive outside the womb without assistance). I argue that if we put abortion-advocates in the dessert with no food and water, their location and viability will result in their death.
I forgot to add they hate people in rural areas too.
Their lies are so obvious if you pay attention. It seems most of their followers do not.
I totally agree with everything you said and, yes, liberalism is a psychosis. For socialism to succeed, those pushing it must break down the sane-ness inside of the individual, so he will willingly submit to the chains.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.