Posted on 01/15/2018 9:21:23 AM PST by barmag25
Project Veritas set Twitter ablaze last week with back to back bombshell undercover videos exposing the social media giant for their ‘big brother’ practices and censorship of Trump supporters. New undercover footage reveals Twitter pays hundreds of employees to view everything you post in private messages including “sex messages” and nude photos.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Explains why Twitter’s worst have covered for fellow travellers outside the company. The only time they seem to do otherwise is when someone is no longer politically useful.
So if minors sent naked pics to each other Twitter is viewing and saving those images on their servers.
There should be charges filed.
If they don’t volunteer that they support president Trump, you can bet that they’re working against him and you....that’s everyone in the media, almost everyone in the government, everyone in Hollywood and all union workers.
“...and all union workers”
You might be surprised about this
I did not think of that, but I think the answer is a very obvious yes.
I'd love to be surprised.
Yes. I’m not aware of Twitter actively leading the police to people who have private child porn on their phone. But it certainly seems like Twitter must be aware of people who have private child porn on their phone.
Failure to report such a thing should result in charges.
The only defense would be to build a system in which privacy and anonymity would be assured.
Do you get to talk to rank and file much? I’m just curious. I hear a lot of interesting comments in the last few years. Not as much towing the old party line
Why do people even send sex photos for any reason anyway? That’s just begging for a lawsuit or some kind of problem.
Something to consider when CW2 starts. Guilt by Association...
My ex-FIL was a union secretary. You've never met a more rabid, old style communist. Called everyone "brother". Always running on about the "evul Bosses..." Was actually a Clinton delegate at a national convention, only because Stalin wasn't running.
That he was also an NRA Life Member caused him some small discomfort...
21% of 13 and 14 year olds use Twitter. 41% of 15 to 17 year olds used Twitter.
What do you think?
https://www.statista.com/statistics/184307/usage-of-twitter-among-us-teenagers-by-age-group/
The law requires hosting companies to review and report child pornography. They have legal immunity to do so. Every company performs content reviews and makes reports. Nothing you post on the Internet goes without a review.
The problem is that there is such an avalanche of information that law enforcement has a tough time picking who to prosecute. Law enforcement desires getting the top dogs where law enforcement resources go the furthest.
However, due to new technological capabilities, local law enforcement is getting in on the act of prosecuting.
“So if minors sent naked pics to each other Twitter is viewing and saving those images on their servers.”
If they do not view them there is no crime.
If they view them and save them, it is a hell of a crime.
comment on site:
“Twitter Hot WATER. 1. Twitter knows who’s underage because they have all user data. 2. You know they
have underage “dick pic”photos on their databases...kids do these things 3. Their engineers viewed the photos
and knew they were underage, so they can’t invoke “I didn’t know”...THEY KNEW. By KEEPING the photos and allowing them to
be propagated...they traffic in CHILD PORN. If I were a US
attorney....I’d be getting a search warrant right now!...bet there’s a
lot of bleach bitting going on at Twitter right now”
Sounds like it sounds like it is systemic to view whatever messages that are sent. Unless if they have a company policy to never look at what minors send, then it sounds like a lot of kiddie things are being viewed by their staff.
This guy says they are saving it. They have teams of hundreds of people to look at these and save them.
https://www.projectveritas.com/2018/01/15/hidden-camera-hundreds-of-twitter-employees-paid-to-view-everything-you-post-online-including-private-sex-messages/
In 18 states, any adult is considered a mandated reporter for child abuse. As completely expected, California is not one of those states.
If there is such a law as you mentioned, it seems they are certainly guilty if there are underage images.
They also can’t claim lack of knowledge of any criminal conspiracies that go on through DM’s (like Antifa organizing violence, for example). They have made themselves accomplices after the fact.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.