Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Well, the rich need to pay their "fair" share, right?/s
1 posted on 01/10/2018 3:05:46 PM PST by dynachrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dynachrome

The relevant nugget:

“U.S. tax law prohibits private foundations from owning more than a 20 percent stake in a for-profit company after the founder’s death. The penalty for not complying is a 200 percent fine on the value of any additional holdings.”


2 posted on 01/10/2018 3:06:44 PM PST by dynachrome (When an empire dies, you are left with vast monuments in front of which peasants squat to defecate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

What we’ve got here is failure to communicate.


3 posted on 01/10/2018 3:10:18 PM PST by Artemis Webb (Maxine Waters for House Minority Leader!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Aren’t Foundations supposed to be none profit. Sounds like they feel that they are above the laws that little people must abide by.


4 posted on 01/10/2018 3:10:32 PM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome
The company had a five-year grace period after Newman's death to comply with the law. Once that was over, executives requested and received an additional five-year extension to come up with a solution.

You have had and extra five years to figure it out.

Time to comply with the law.

Sell.

8 posted on 01/10/2018 3:17:48 PM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.L)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome
As an aside, Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward lived two towns away from me in Connecticut (I lived in Darien, they in Westport).

They were known to be regular Joes...lived modestly and were respected by the townspeople.

That's quite an honor when compared to what Hollywood produces lately.

9 posted on 01/10/2018 3:17:49 PM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

It might just be me, but looking at the organizations that Newman funds, it sounds like a full employment plan for commies who don’t want to work.


10 posted on 01/10/2018 3:18:11 PM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome
Dumb tax code. I'd rather a profit making company funding charities than the taxpayers.
 
11 posted on 01/10/2018 3:19:09 PM PST by Governor Dinwiddie (CNN is fake news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Newman's Own is a food company founded by actor Paul Newman and author A.E. Hotchner in 1982. The company gives 100% of the after-tax profits from the sale of its products to Newman's Own Foundation (a private non-profit foundation) which in turn, gives the money to various educational and charitable organizations

Newman's charity does great work for seriously ill children. Lots of them.


14 posted on 01/10/2018 3:23:20 PM PST by 867V309 (Lock Her Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

I don’t know what it’s like down in the United States, but up here at my local grocery store, the Newman’s Own brand tends to be that bit more expensive than the others.


16 posted on 01/10/2018 3:27:13 PM PST by OttawaFreeper ("If I had to go to war again, I'd bring lacrosse players" Conn Smythe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

They didn’t have a good enough accountant or tax lawyer to catch this before now?


17 posted on 01/10/2018 3:27:18 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Death tax...... is that the problem?

It must be sold to pay the taxes


18 posted on 01/10/2018 3:29:38 PM PST by Thibodeaux (2018 is looking good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

... a violation of the separation of powers concept. 1703 The clause thus prohibits all legislative acts, ‘’no matter what their form, that apply either to named individuals or to easily ascertainable members of a group...”

Can Congress legitimately pass legislation pertaining to a particular company?


32 posted on 01/10/2018 4:40:26 PM PST by sparklite2 (See more at Sparklite Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson