Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dynachrome

Aren’t Foundations supposed to be none profit. Sounds like they feel that they are above the laws that little people must abide by.


4 posted on 01/10/2018 3:10:32 PM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fella

Foundations and non-profits invest their cash somewhere. They can purchase equities just like you and me. As you know, the return on equities sure has beaten bonds the last coup.e of years.

The law says they cannot own more than 20% of the shares in a company. That is a LOT MORE restrictive than the law for you and me.

Would you rather entirely forbid them from owning any stocks?


5 posted on 01/10/2018 3:14:35 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: fella

Non-profit does not mean they cannot end up with more money. Non profits do not have a goal to make more, but if they do if they still appear to be doing their purpose its incidental that they end up with more money.


33 posted on 01/10/2018 5:42:52 PM PST by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson