Posted on 01/08/2018 2:26:37 PM PST by Kaslin
RUSH: Let me ask a question again, before moving on to audio sound bites. If, as Michael Wolff alleges in this book of his, that Donald Trump did not want to win the presidency, never intended to win it, in fact, actively wanted to lose, he was running for other reasons, and if his wife, Melania Trump, never did believe that they were gonna win and was assured by her husband not to worry, he wasn’t gonna win, he wasn’t serious about winning, so upset she was crying on election night, could somebody explain to me why, then, Trump was colluding with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary Clinton?
If Trump didn’t want to win, if he wanted to lose, so much so that his wife was in tears on election night, realizing her husband had won, if Trump wanted to use the campaign to launch other business opportunities and perhaps entertainment business careers, if that’s the purpose, and the book that Wolff wrote alleges, assures us Trump never intended to win, then why was there any collusion with the Russians to make sure he won?
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/650-010818-Trump-Putin.jpg>
Why did Trump cheat? Why did Trump work with Putin and the Russians to steal the election from Hillary if he didn’t want to win in the first place? Hmm?
Great Question
Cause he really likes their dressing?
If Trump didn’t want to win, why did he campaign rings around 17 gop candidates, and Hillary Clinton. From Sept 1 to Nov 8 2016, Trump held 127 rallies compared to Clinton’s 57 rallies. On top of the rallies, Trump had hundreds of press availabilities, meet and greets, and tours of factories, etc. No one works that hard if they don’t want to win, and would be perfectly OK with losing. He also spent millions of his own dollars.
Obviously, he hoped the Russians would help him achieve his goal of losing the election.
easy.
trump was lying. he wanted to win. but he told everyone else he didnt. he wanted to waste all that time and money. i mean what successful businessman doesn’tdo the exact same thing every day?
yeah its totally plausible. /sarc
Could it be because Wolff was paid off to write a book of lies and slander?
Rush nails it again
Another question, even IF the Russians were capable of influencing the election what would they have to gain by sabotaging Her Heinois’ campaign? Especially since she helped enable Putin to get his hot little hands on all that uranium. She would’ve been 0bama 2.0
It’s just another cockeyed theory that some doofus pulled out of his rectum. If I’d actually bought this book I would be too embarrassed to admit it. If anyone is stupid enough to buy the trash, they’re stupid enough to “buy” everything in it.
This is proof that Trump is not of sound mind, of course! /s
He colluded to LOSE!!!
If Trump Didn’t Want to Win, Why Was He Supposedly Colluding with the Russians?
Obviously because he was mentally ill and senile. [/sarc]
There you go... being logical.
I said this last week on here, but anyway, RUSH needs to let go of this BS book.
Who cares already.
Pointed exactly this out to a Leftist on Twitter yesterday.
No response; well, nothing coherent to the question.
Don’t bother the left with logic. They still haven’t explained how Trump could simultaneously be a rabid America-first nationalist and a treasonous collaborator with Russian imperialist and economic ambitions.
Notice also that the book was written, edited and published in less than ONE MONTH.
It was written to be a COUNTER to the book by Donna Brazile.
The Accidental President....
Let’s just call him Dave....
This whole collusion theory is pure BS on its face. Trump substantially won a majority of states. For Russia to have tipped the election they would have had to substantially alter the results in more than a dozen states without being detected and where the vote totals where not even close. Even the arguement that the Russians smeared Hillary with false email leaks etc. and thus swung the election to Trump also doesn’t hold water with the Democrats themselves touting that Hillary won the popular vote by millions. This hardly makes the case for a successful national smear campaign. Hillary was a poor candidate, ran a lack luster campaign, failed to campaign in states where she thought the results were solid and had a presence in public of being smarmy and condescending. Her bizarre health related behavior also may have planted doubt in many people’s minds. The electoral map is also telling. Hillary won only in solid left wing enclaves, but failed in the middle of the country especially among the middle class working voters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.