[chris37]

It isn’t anit-GBLT, it’s pro-freedom.

[tomkat]

             

[Moonman62]

The law was immediately challenged. But lower courts, without ruling on the merits of the law, said those suing could not show that they would be harmed by it.

...

Imagine that. There’s no harm, but they still want to destroy anybody who doesn’t bake them a gay cake (unless the bakers are Muslims).

[Senator Goldwater]

Thank God for this Supreme Court, and looking forward to Trump replacing Ginsburg and Breyer in the first term.

[kjam22]

When the winds of changes shift....

[vette6387]

Does anyone know what the decision was? 5/4?

[billorites]

Well, bless their heart!

[beergarden]

Good. After 8 years of faggot bullying from the left, it’s time to fight back.

[Yosemitest]

"We will keep fighting in Mississippi until we overturn this harmful law, and in any state where anti-gay legislators pass laws to roll back LGBT civil rights," said Beth Littrell of Lambda Legal.

If we OBEYED GOD, we would NOT have this problem.

Homosexuals had to "Earn their REPROBATE MIND" by refusing God ~ not once, ~ not twice, ~ but THREE times!

You need to not only read, BUT STUDY this link
I especially agree with its last paragraph.

" The Church NEVER can and NEVER will give satisfaction—
and the homosexualist knows it,
for he knows the words against him are INERADICABLE
—to the declared and impenitent homosexual,
the person who, through an act of the vermiculate will,
has identified his person with a sin,
whether HE DEMANDS ACCEPTANCE OF HIS SIN
through "love,"
or VINDICATION
THROUGH IDENTIFICATION OF HIS PERCEIVED ENEMIES AS BIGOTS.
Whether HE PRESENTS HIMSELF as an object of love or indignation,
what HE DEMANDS in either case IS ACCEPTANCE
not of the person,
but OF THE SIN-bound and SIN-DEFINED person.
HE DEMANDS the declaration of SPIRITUAL AUTHORITY that
THERE IS NOTHING OBJECTIVELY DISORDERED about this BINDING OF MAN TO SIN,
and ASSURANCE that THIS MONSTROUS AMALGAM can indeed ENTER the kingdom of heaven.
This can NEVER HAPPEN among Christians UNTIL THEY ABANDON Christianity,
WHICH IS AT WAR WITH EVERY SIN,
and whose indelible constitution
places ALL PERVERSIONS of the perfect man
AT THE MUZZLE of its canons. "

There will be NO HOMOSEXUALS ( NOT ONE ) in the afterlife.
They WILL BE ASHES UNDER the soles of your feet ! ! !

[DoodleDawg]

Signed into law in 2016 in response to the Supreme Court's gay marriage ruling, it allows county clerks to avoid issuing marriage licenses to gay couples and protects businesses from lawsuits if they refuse to serve LGBT customers.

Consider sexual orientation is not a protected class under the Mississippi anti-discrimination laws then businesses could already refuse to serve LGBT customers.

[AndyTheBear]

I was curious to know what the law actually said...but I can’t from the article. They are just so matter-of-factly dishonest.

[EagleUSA]

Finally, some pro-Constitution action from our SCOTUS. Our freedoms are precious and the radical, LGBT left would take those away to suit their sick agenda.

[Uncle Sam 911]

Kentucky clerks, you win! Bakers, you win. Anyone with morals wins. Excellent!!

[Buckeye McFrog]

So the trial judge in the next case will take the hint and rule that the plaintiffs WERE harmed. Feh.

[libertylover]

I hope they’re realizing what a monumental mistake they made with gay marriage.

[Thibodeaux]

Queers have ordinary contracts at law that are not marriages.

[NobleFree]

Hold the champagne. It seems as though as soon as a plaintiff turns up who has in fact been refused a marriage license, or wedding cake, or whatever, it’ll be a new ball game:

‘A three-judge panel at the New Orleans-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed a lower court ruling that blocked the 2016 law, known as House Bill 1523 and backed by Christian groups, from taking effect.

‘The panel said the plaintiffs, who included ordained ministers who have married same-sex couples and same-sex couples seeking to marry, did not have standing to bring the lawsuit.

‘”None of these plaintiffs has clearly shown an injury-in-fact,” said the panel, which did not rule on the merits of the law.’

- https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/court-lifts-injunction-mississippi-law-seen-anti-lgbt-n775731

[Hostage]

This is the best defense against the GayStoppo. How are they hurt?

Are they hurt because they can’t receive a marriage license? They can get the equivalent by recording a civil domestic partnership with a governing contract that functions equivalently to a marriage contract.

Can’t get a wedding cake? Purchase a cake and write your own words, put on your own ornaments. No harm is done by the baker.

These sexual deviants want to make straight people buckle to their view, bow before sodomy and unnatural acts.

[Republican Wildcat]

And what about this law is “Anti-LGBT”? It takes nothing away from them - it just allows people to recuse themselves from being involved in their lifestyle.

More fake news from the MSM.

[Lionheartusa1]

WINNING , WINNING , WINNING !!! Can you say precedent ??