Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As Media Torches Supposed Bombshell Book On Trump, Author Says Parts Of It Could Be Totally Wrong
Townhall.com ^ | January 5, 2018 | Matt Vespa

Posted on 01/05/2018 3:18:21 PM PST by Kaslin

Well, the day has arrived. Michael Wolff’s book Fire and Fury: Inside The Trump White House has hit the bookshelves. The sales are going through the roof. It’s already number one on Amazon’s best-seller’s list, with NPR reporting that one D.C. bookstore (shocker!) sold out of their copies in 20 minutes. In a town where gossip is currency, this is pure gold, but how much of it is true. Excerpts were published in New York Magazine, where liberals took a keen interest in this passage [emphasis mine]:

That New York magazine profile on the Trump administration sure is entertaining. Really unflattering stuff. Also, pretty sure a lot of it is bullshit. Come on, fellas. pic.twitter.com/EDKQCAcqZY— Ruthless T. Firefly (@BecketAdams) January 3, 2018

The day after the election, the bare-bones transition team that had been set up during the campaign hurriedly shifted from Washington to Trump Tower. The building — now the headquarters of a populist revolution —­ suddenly seemed like an alien spaceship on Fifth Avenue. But its otherworldly air helped obscure the fact that few in Trump’s inner circle, with their overnight responsibility for assembling a government, had any relevant experience.

Ailes, a veteran of the Nixon, Reagan, and Bush 41 administrations, tried to impress on Trump the need to create a White House structure that could serve and protect him. “You need a son of a bitch as your chief of staff,” he told Trump. “And you need a son of a bitch who knows Washington. You’ll want to be your own son of a bitch, but you don’t know Washington.” Ailes had a suggestion: John Boehner, who had stepped down as Speaker of the House only a year earlier.

Who’s that?” asked Trump.

For every media member giddy over the story around Trump, an avid Fox News watcher, not knowing who John Boehner was, here's a pro tip: They have search engines for Twitter and stuff to at least attempt to scrutinize the claim. Here's 7 examples alone: https://t.co/NGc3ZQdREA— Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) January 3, 2018

Of course, Trump knew who John Boehner was; he had only tweeted about him multiple times over the years. The book details rather unflattering moments within the Trump presidency, including the notion that the 45th president didn’t think he was going to win. That also included his closest inner circle; they had already moved on to what he would do next. The Trump news network that was rumored late summer of 2016 was supposedly mulled as the next project. Trump and others knew his brand of neo-populism would carry past 2016—and then he won the election.

As liberals lick their lips over the juicy details, let’s not forget that it isn’t just the Trump White House that’s slamming this book. Former members of the Obama administration, other members of the news media, and even CNN have warned that this book is shoddy at parts. Even the author, Michael Wolff, who has described himself as a “famous bloviator,” admits that parts of his book could be untrue, even with tapes of conversations between Steve Bannon and other top Trump officials, though other interviews were off the record. Wolff even makes a note of it in his book, which Business Insider dissected. They concluded that for some portions of the book, it’s pretty much impossible to discern things, like how someone felt [emphasis mine]:

Here is the relevant part of the note, from the 10th page of the book's prologue:

"Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are baldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book.

"Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true."

The book itself, reviewed by Business Insider from a copy acquired prior to its Friday publication, is not always clear about what level of confidence the author has in any particular assertion.

Lengthy, private conversations are reported verbatim, as are difficult-to-ascertain details like what somebody was thinking or how the person felt.

Wolff attributes his book to "more than two hundred interviews" with people including Trump and "most members of his senior staff."

And then comes the reviews from his colleagues in the news media. Yes, they’ve made some whoppers. ABC News’ Brian Ross being one of the most recent reporters to step on a rake for botching the dates in a Trump-Russia story, which got him suspended for four weeks without pay. That suspension ended yesterday, though he didn’t show up for work. But even this book has members of the news media criticizing it for its sloppiness and looseness with the truth.

The New York Times’ Maggie Haberman said Wolff got basic details wrong (via Washington Examiner):

"I believe parts of it and then there are other parts that are factually wrong," she said on CNN. "I can see several places in the book that are wrong. So for instance, he inaccurately describes a report in the New York Times. He inaccurately characterizes a couple of incidents that took place early on in the administration. He gets basic details wrong."

Haberman said Wolff's "style" is to create a broad narrative in a story, but gets many of the details wrong.

"He creates a narrative that is notionally true, conceptually true, the details are often wrong," she said.

Haberman said Trump is also incorrect when he says he never met with Wolff, but she also said that Wolff is "overstating the access he had to the president" to write the book.

CNN’s Alisyn Camerota warned viewers that this book isn’t journalism, citing his prologue (via The Hill):

"We should mention that it sounds like Michael Wolff's modus operandi was to let the people he interviewed spin yarns," the "New Day" co-host said, said regarding "Fire and Fury."

"And then he didn't necessarily fact-check them. He didn't necessarily need two sources," the former "Fox & Friends" host continued.

"This isn't really journalism. This is a very interesting read but in terms of the way he processed them, he admits in the author's note that he let people tell their own stories and he printed them," she concluded.

Note to Trump: You have to truly be an idiot to cooperate in any way with Michael Wolff, widely agreed to be a total sleaze bag.— Steven Rattner (@SteveRattner) January 4, 2018

Bannon may well have said all that stuff but let's remember that Wolff is an unprincipled writer of fiction. https://t.co/UfRzFnIGox— Steven Rattner (@SteveRattner) January 4, 2018

Axios’ Mike Allen and Jim Vanehei wrote, “There are definitely parts of Michael Wolff's "Fire and Fury" that are wrong, sloppy, or betray off-the-record confidence.” Steve Rattner, who headed President Obama’s task force for the auto bailout, called Wolff a “total sleaze bag” and an “unprincipled fiction writer.” Left wing Salon also admitted that the book is not “super reliable,” though they added it’s too juicy to pass up. In all, it’ll probably add the self-righteousness and insufferable smugness that veteran reporters Woodward and Bernstein mentioned this week. In the meantime, if you want to buy it, go for it—just know that there’s some fake news mixed in it.  

"Too good to check" is the motto for covering Trump. For not knowing who Boehner is, he sure did tweet about him and talk about him a lot. https://t.co/IzCbszMlfc— Mollie (@MZHemingway) January 3, 2018



TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 1moretime; bannon; media; trump; wolff; wolffbook; wolffbookfiction; wolffbooklies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 01/05/2018 3:18:22 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I may be totally wrong but I'm a...

Dancin' Fool!

I may be toe-tally wrong but I'M A FOOOOL!!

2 posted on 01/05/2018 3:20:03 PM PST by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It should be sold in the Fiction section.


3 posted on 01/05/2018 3:21:56 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Author Says Parts Of It Could Be Totally Wrong...

But, it's just the part between the front and rear covers.

4 posted on 01/05/2018 3:24:28 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
It should be sold in the Fiction section.

Like the "Trump Dossier," that was used by Obama and Hillary to justify using the national security apparatus of the United States to collect political intelligence about their opponent in the 2016 election?

5 posted on 01/05/2018 3:24:51 PM PST by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This hit piece full of admitted lies didn’t even make it 1 full day.


6 posted on 01/05/2018 3:30:15 PM PST by raiderboy ( "...if we have to close down our government, weÂ’re building that wall")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Amazon wouldn’t accept my review.....


7 posted on 01/05/2018 3:33:32 PM PST by clintonh8r (I've been banned from TheHill.com. #Proud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

who effin cares about this pos pile of lies.


8 posted on 01/05/2018 3:33:39 PM PST by connyankee (#covfefe lives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connyankee
who effin cares about this pos pile of lies.

The millions of drooling morons who watch the MSM propaganda outlets, that's who.

9 posted on 01/05/2018 3:37:41 PM PST by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

I miss FZ.


10 posted on 01/05/2018 3:39:27 PM PST by SkyShot (Jesus is coming. Look busy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Comic Porn For Leftards


11 posted on 01/05/2018 3:43:16 PM PST by Vlad The Inhaler (United We Stand, Divided We Fall. Remember That Diversity Is The Opposite Of Unity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

MSMLSD just foaming at the mouth over this book. We’ll see what happens when all the truth comes out.


12 posted on 01/05/2018 4:06:54 PM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

I won’t even do a search for the book on Amazon, as I have no interest in reading it.


13 posted on 01/05/2018 4:06:55 PM PST by Kaslin (Quid est Veritas?: What Is Truth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Doesn’t PMSNBC do that regularly?


14 posted on 01/05/2018 4:11:48 PM PST by Kaslin (Quid est Veritas?: What Is Truth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ya, especially Chris “Tingles” Matthews.


15 posted on 01/05/2018 4:17:21 PM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Not everything in my book truthful?


16 posted on 01/05/2018 4:22:57 PM PST by MuttTheHoople (Yes, Liberals, I question your patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

would love to see this “book” run through 1 of the plagiarism software programs. Of course you would have to buy the piece of crap book first.


17 posted on 01/05/2018 4:51:37 PM PST by Chickenhawk Warmonger (Obama Lied & Americans Died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Laughing all the way to the bank!


18 posted on 01/05/2018 5:17:53 PM PST by Maudeen (http://www.thereishopeinJesus.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Dear Book Publishers,

My second cousin’s childhood friend (sadly, both have passed away) once told my other cousin that his friend saw a 5-year old DJ Trump blow up a BLACK anthill with a BLACKcat firecracker.

Therefore, President Trump needs to be impeached, and probably executed in the Town Square. After all, he is RACIST with links to TERRORISM. Firecrackers, after all, use GUNpowder and Terrorists use GUNS!!!

See how easy this is?

Maybe the ‘DJ’ stands for Dwayne Joseph or maybe not.

Regardless, PM me here at FreeRepublic if you want to do a book deal.


19 posted on 01/05/2018 5:25:15 PM PST by Oscar in Batangas (12:01 PM 1/20/2017...The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TTFlyer

true. But I don’t count them among the living LOL


20 posted on 01/05/2018 5:26:28 PM PST by connyankee (#covfefe lives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson