You apparently have a very subjective understanding of the word "objective." He was 28 points ahead before the accusations against him were made. How does "bad candidate" comport with a 28 point lead?
He gave every indication that he would have been an enormous pain in the ass in Washington, and would have accomplished absolutely nothing for his efforts.
You see that as a bad thing? I think you and I have different ideas about what needs to be happening in Washington DC. I liked Moore precisely because I expected him to be a huge pain in the ass to the good ole boy system of favor trading and such.
A bag of horse manure running on the Republican ticket would have had a 28 point lead in Alabama.
Moore mailed it in and disappeared from the campaign trail in the closing weeks of the race. He refused to debate his opponent. Hillary Clinton ran a more energetic campaign.
He didn't just have a 28 point lead, dude. He BLEW a 28 point lead.
The poster you are responding to has said that Christianity is incompatible with democratic governance. The majority always goes with the crooks so Christians who don’t believe in being crooks are always losers - and always should be, because they “don’t have winner written on them”, according to his/her previous posts.
Just want you to know what you’re dealing with here. A political darwinist. Amoral.
And I think the same probably holds true for a bunch of people who are very vocally anti-Moore here. Probably within the voting public too.
We are truly engaged in a war against any kind of moral standards, and especially Christianity. Even here on FR.