Posted on 12/30/2017 10:44:39 AM PST by jazusamo
A Major Victory: State Releases Clinton Server Emails from Weiner’s Laptop!
Judicial Watch Opposes Secrecy in Obama IRS Scandal
Happy New Year!
A Major Victory: State Releases Clinton Server Emails from Weiner’s Laptop!
Today, the U.S. Department of State began releasing Huma Abedin’s work-related documents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) that were found on her estranged husband Anthony Weiner’s personal laptop.
This is a major victory. After years of hard work in federal court, Judicial Watch forced the State Department to finally allow Americans to see these public documents. We have been following this case closely because from our past experience we know that Abedin’s emails include classified and other sensitive materials.
The document are still being posted, but our team has seen enough to confirm that classified information from Hillary Clinton’s email server has been found on the laptop of Anthony Weiner, the disgraced former congressman from New York who was married to Clinton aide Huma Abedin. The fact that classified information has been found from Clinton and Abedin on Weiner’s laptop shows the urgent need for a criminal investigation by the Justice Department.
Back in October, in accordance with a court ordered production of documents, the State Department announced : “The State Department identified approximately 2,800 work-related documents among the documents provided by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.” The State Department told the court it expected to complete its review and production of the FBI records by December 31, 2017.
The production of these documents is the result of a May 5, 2015, lawsuit we filed against the State Department ( Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00684)). We sued after State failed to respond to a March 18, 2015, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking: “All emails of official State Department business received or sent by former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin from January 1, 2009 through February 1, 2013 using a non-‘state.gov’ email address.”
Abedin was former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s deputy chief of staff. Weiner is a disgraced former congressman and New York mayoral candidate who pleaded guilty to transferring obscene material to a minor. Abedin kept a non-State.gov email account that she used repeatedly for government business on Hillary Clinton’s notorious email server(s).
We previously released 20 productions of documents in this case that show examples of mishandling classified information and instances of pay to play between the Clinton State Department and the Clinton Foundation. Also, at least 627 emails were not part of the 55,000 pages of emails that Clinton turned over, and further contradict a statement by Clinton that, “ as far as she knew ,” all of her government emails had been turned over to department.
Perhaps Clinton and Abedin were expecting all of this to just go away with Clinton’s election to the White House last year. Let’s hope the Justice Department finally gets it act together and proves that bet wrong.
Judicial Watch Opposes Secrecy in Obama IRS Scandal
Judicial Watch continues the fight for accountability over the misdeeds tied to the Obama IRS scandal. We just asked a federal court to unseal the depositions of Lois Lerner, the former director of the Exempt Organizations Unit of the IRS, and Holly Paz, her top aide and former IRS director of Office of Rulings and Agreements. Both played key roles in the targeting of conservative nonprofit groups opposed to Obama policies in the run up to the 2012 presidential election.
We made the request in an amicus curiae brief filed with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, supporting NorCal Tea Party Patriots’ class action lawsuit seeking the unsealing of the depositions ( NorCal Tea Party Patriots, et al. v. The Internal Revenue Service, et al. (No. 1:13-cv-00341)).
A federal judge sealed the depositions after Lerner’s and Paz’s lawyers claimed the two were receiving threats. Our brief argues that the documents sought may shed light on government misconduct, and the shielding of internal government deliberations does not serve the public’s interest.
We detailed how the Lerner and Paz depositions may significantly impact our ongoing lawsuits seeking information about misconduct by government officials in the IRS targeting scandal:
In addition to the revelation of IRS employees’ conduct in the emails uncovered, the records obtained by Judicial Watch [in the course of its FOIA investigation] also sparked investigations into Lois Lerner’s emails and IRS’ failure to preserve thousands of emails that were potentially relevant to the various investigations about the IRS’ treatment of conservative groups. While the federal government has now admitted that the targeting “was wrong” and “for such treatment, the IRS expresses its sincere apology” the IRS continues to this day to withhold from the public in Judicial Watch’s main IRS case … email communications with Lois Lerner and/or Holly Paz …
Lerner was actively engaged in the attempted cover-up of IRS misconduct. In July 2016, we revealed that both Lerner and Paz , knew the agency was specifically targeting “Tea Party” and other conservative organizations two full years before disclosing it to Congress and the public. They also knew donor lists of tax-exempt organizations were being used to target those donors for audits .
After refusing to acknowledge the targeting, the IRS was forced by Judicial Watch to finally admit that the agency had used “inappropriate political labels” to screen the tax-exempt applications of conservative organizations. IRS agents were targeting organizations requesting tax-exempt status based on “ guilt by association ” and “party affiliation.” We brought to light the fact that the IRS was going to require 501(c)(4) nonprofit organizations to restrict their alleged political activities in exchange for “expedited consideration” of their tax-exempt applications.
In April 2015 we released court ordered IRS documents that included an email from Lerner asking that a program be set up to “put together some training points to help them [IRS staffers] understand the potential pitfalls” of revealing too much information to Congress. The documents also contain a Lerner email from 2013 in which she says she is willing to take the blame on some aspects of the scandal. She also indicates that she “understands why the IRS criteria” leading to the targeting of Tea Party and other opponents of the President Obama “might raise questions.”
In July 2015 we revealed that the IRS scandal also included the Justice Department and FBI as well. According to documents we obtained under court order, in an October 2010 meeting Lerner, Justice Department officials and the FBI planned for the possible criminal prosecution of targeted nonprofit organizations for alleged illegal political activity. As part of that effort, the Obama IRS gave the FBI 21 computer disks, containing 1.25 million pages of confidential IRS returns from 113,000 non-profit, 501(c)(4) social welfare groups as part of its prosecution effort.
According to a letter from then-House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) to IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, “This revelation likely means that the IRS – including possibly Lois Lerner – violated federal tax law by transmitting this information to the Justice Department.”
In response to our litigation, the IRS initially claimed that emails belonging to Lerner were missing. Later, IRS officials conceded that the “missing” emails were on IRS back-up systems. Throughout our litigation, we have repeatedly exposed a variety of IRS record keeping inconsistencies, erroneous claims, and failures to produce court-ordered records:
In a republic, citizens have a right to know what their government is up to, especially when officials abuse the powers entrusted to them. This effort to seal Lois Lerner and Holly Paz depositions for all time is affront to the rule of law and government accountability.
For the full history on our IRS battles, click here .
A cold, cold snap ends 2017, but I pray your hearts are warmed by the prospects of renewal and hope in 2018.
With this in mind, all of us here at Judicial Watch wish you a Happy New Year!
Until next week …
I believe there was a post on FR earlier today that there
were emails on the laptop that were sent after President
Trump was sworn into office. Now that will certainly be something AG Sessions can go after.
Enough is Enough!
Put that CRIMINAL in PRISON already!!!
Still kabuki
Larry Klayman left Judicial Watch 12 or so years ago and Tom Fitton started running it.
Larry Klayman now has Freedom Watch.
DC is evil and corrupt.
OK, OK, OK, we all get it. Clinton and Abedin traded classified emails, some of which were found on Weiner’s laptop. We have all read and heard it numerous times. So NOW WHAT IF ANYTHING will be done about it?......
The “CRICKETS” are really hard to hear right now, if at all.
If true it sure would be and he should.
Riddle me this
Anthony had had it all stored in his computer labeled "insurance policy"
If you jail them too soon they become martyrs.
Nov 2, 2016 - Here is why the NYC police turned the Wiener computer stuff to the FBI: it has a file about how he planned to cover up his sex crimes by blowing the lid on ... Anthony Weiner for sexting a 15 yr old and stumbled on tens of thousands of emails in a folder labeled “life insurance” on Anthony Weiner's laptop.
What this proves is how careless Abedin/Clinton were with classified documents. There should be federal charges, not against Weiner but against Huma and Hillary.
He was laughed off this forum.
“So NOW WHAT IF ANYTHING will be done about it?......”
It shouldn’t work this way, but I think that it does. There isn’t a scandal unless we see it in the media day after day. Only then can something be “done” about it. Remember when Donald Rumsfeld said, “You don’t go to war with the equipment you need, you go to war with the equipment you have.”(?) That was replayed over and over by the media, generating a scandal about how badly Rumsfeld was handling the Gulf War. He hadn’t supplied the up-armored Humvees that were so desperately needed. I couldn’t believe how that very important point went from being a significant observation by the Secretary of Defense to a scandal about how the man was insensitive and uncaring about personnel losses. This case is the opposite of the Hillary Clinton “scandal” but it illustrates the point. Nothing will be done about the Clinton crime family until the media gets on board. The media will not get on board unless they feel the need to prevent Hillary from running against their chosen candidate in 2020. Then, listen to the drumbeat about the emails. Then, she can be indicted. Until the media is on board, and, they never will be, nothing can happen.
Why does it work that way? I think it’s because the Republicans went after Bill and attempted to throw him out of office for what the Left decided was just Bill being Bill. It was unfair and immoral to impeach a rapist and liar if it was their rapist and liar. The political damage from the impeachment was devastating to the Republicans and now they are once burned, twice shy. Hillary could kill and eat children on live TV and nothing would happen. She’d probably write a best selling cookbook titled, “What’s Cookin.’”
“If you jail them too soon they become martyrs.”
I must disagree.
If the Clintons had gone to prison got Whitewater, we’d have been spared DECADES of deep corruption.
You have to hand it to Judicial Watch. . .they are judicious in their hunt for information leading to a less corrupt America. An end of the year donation on the way.
Our family has sent them a donation.
So have I and another is set to go this week.
But will there be consequences for the guilty?
Nah.
Why are we looking into this? According to many Fox News pundits and talking heads, this is old news! We are not going to do anything about it now. Let’s just move on.
What difference does it make now.
Again with the double standard. If enough time passes, well it is just political. No harm done. Nothing to be gained by opening up old wounds. Tell that to Roy Moore as a place to start. IF it is good enough to persecute him for issues 30 years past, why should we give a pass to Hilary, et al, for their criminal behavior.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
