Of course he does. Rubio a homosexual Democrat.
I’m really sick of this lisping little back-stabber - already positioning himself as a 2020 alternative for the deep state.
Marco is more interested in big government, so of course he thinks that.
not if the anti-business, anti-rich, anti-growth environment is stopped by more freedom and more private property rights, which increases security of private property, which increases incentives to grow and expand
Marco,
Do you know how much economic activity will be generated by these lowered business tax rates? They will expand business, bring plants and HQ’s back to this country and HIRE people, LOTS of people. People from all walks of life will be able to find a job but more importantly, find better jobs with better pay.
As Ronald Reagan said, “The best social program is a job”. Lowering corporate and business taxes (which were way too high to begin with), will do that: bringing lots of jobs and career opportunities to everyone.
Expect to see this in all the ads for 2018. What a pos.
Someone should tell Little Marco that a corporation is a group of individuals.
“By and large, you’re going to see a lot of these multinationals buy back shares to drive up the price. Some of them will be forced, because they’re sitting on historic levels of cash, to pay out dividends to shareholders.”
There’s no real economic difference between a share buyback and a dividend. To illustrate: imagine a company has $10bn in stock outstanding and $1bn in cash. It distributes the $1bn in a dividend ratably to all investors. Every investor gets cash equal to 10% of the value of their shares.
Alternatively the company can buy back 10% of its stock for $1bn. If every investor sold 10% of their shares to the company, they would each get 10% of the value of their shares in cash, and at the end they would still own the same % of the company they started out with. They would own fewer shares numerically, but because there are fewer overall shares of the company outstanding, the same stake in the company.
The differences between the two are mainly taxes (which are different for selling shares and receiving a dividend) and investor preference (you have to take a dividend but you don’t have to sell your shares into a buyback).
But my point is, share buybacks and a dividends are just two common means for a company to distribute cash to existing shareholders, and if Rubio thinks that a dividend is somehow good and a share buyback is somehow pointless, he is clueless.
“Little Marco staying true to form....”
Another brilliant, intellectual, Progressive genius.
IMHO
Had to stop right there. Obviously this is fake news and not worth the time.
Besides, who cares what Rubio thinks?
Gang of 8 Pansy and RINO
I’m sure Jeb is devastated too.
His hopes to be POTUS will be dashed.
He is such a tool. One econ-blog or Conservative site noted when he was going for a higher tax rate he was doing the bidding of the EU because they are scared ****less that they won't be competitive.
So how much money is he getting from their lobbying arm?
******************
Maybe he should move to England.
And there you have it. Marco Rubio wants to be king.
This is Rush Limbaugh’s “full-throated conservative.”
Sorry, trick question. He never was. He just pretended to be during his Senate election campaign.
every now and then rubio does or says something that absolutely ruins his chances for further office and shows who he really is
“”By and large, you’re going to see a lot of these multinationals buy back shares to drive up the price. Some of them will be forced, because they’re sitting on historic levels of cash, to pay out dividends to shareholders.”
exactly. who do you think crafted this tax bill? goldman sachs and their ilk.