Protégé of "Jengis" John Kerry.
Posted on 12/28/2017 6:03:42 AM PST by COBOL2Java
Absolutely correct.
It was Obama's Rules of Engagement that allowed ISIS to grow.
Strategic patience, my a$$.
The clearest example of Obama’s idiotic rules of engagement was when the drivers of ISIS oil tanker trucks were given warnings of impending air attacks, and the opportunity to escape.
all the bad things during BO’ presidency were because of Bush.
All the good things during Trump’s is because of NO. Got that?
Protégé of "Jengis" John Kerry.
Harf the one who said all the terrorists needed were jobs. They had jobs: raping, pillaging, and killing.
#SpayandNeuterAllLiberals...
I doubt the brass had the nerve to present a winning stategy to the bogus POTUS lest they be purged as some were.
It is amazing. The default fallback, the fundamental foundation of every single liberal ever known to man, is that PID (Poverty, Ignorance, and Disease) are responsible for every ill experienced by mankind.
Eradicating those things will magically remove everything bad. So that is how they justify everything they do, no matter how stupid, ignorant, useless, wasteful, or harmful it may be.
They refuse to acknowledge that evil exists, and it isn’t just because Poverty, Ignorance, or Disease MADE them be evil.
Or, to quote a Clint Eastwood character (I think): “Some people just need killin’...”
Similarly the term "Non-denial denial" was in vogue for a time during and following Watergate; Saying something that sounds like you are saying something else.
My thoughts exactly.
Bttt
The only way Obama contributed to the defeat of ISIS was through their demoralization when he left office.
It’s Fox’s hiring of idiots like this that stopped my tuning into Fox News.
She’s right. Zero did nothing, thereby encouraging the Russians to do most of the heavy lifting - not being bound by Zero’s unworkable ROEs. DJT came along and finished the job, other than the possible reports that our guys are training the ISIS leftovers to form another ISIS like group ...
For some reason Fox seems to think having the dueling banjos segments offers something to the effect of fair and balanced. Since they got rid of that slogan, why the hell do they keep propagating the illusion?
I thought Tucker’s show might have been interesting with Mark Stein but then they saddled him with that useless, totally disingenuous, walking talking point Goodstein and I switched it to College Football.
Maybe they should all take a hint from Lou Dobbs show and get rid of the dueling banjo twits.
Fox just hired WH press rep Sara Huckabee....so there’s hope.
Why is this dim bulb c*** on Fox News?
Good question. I can’t figure it out.
Fox has really good makeup artists.
Yeah, really. I mean how many years has Shemp Smith been on ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.