Skip to comments.
'There's a war coming,' Marine Corps general warns US troops
Fox News ^
| 12/23/17
Posted on 12/23/2017 8:05:51 AM PST by markomalley
A Marine Corps commandant on Thursday warned U.S. troops stationed in Norway to be prepared for a coming war.
I hope Im wrong, but theres a war coming, Gen. Robert Neller told them. Youre in a fight here, an informational fight, a political fight, by your presence.
Neller pointed to the near future possibility of Russia and the Pacific theater being the next major areas of conflict.
Sgt. Maj. Ronald Green sounded a similar tone.
"Just remember why you're here," Green said. "They're watching. Just like you watch them, they watch you. We've got 300 Marines up here; we could go from 300 to 3,000 overnight. We could raise the bar."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: fourth100days; trumpdod; usmilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: markomalley
Preparation for war is how the peace is preserved. Our military should always be ready for the worst on little or no notice.
2
posted on
12/23/2017 8:11:27 AM PST
by
Spok
("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
To: markomalley
Trump should sign a EO requiring politicians to be on the front lines of any war.
3
posted on
12/23/2017 8:15:12 AM PST
by
davidb56
To: markomalley
300 Marines in Norway?
That’s enough to scour the country clean of Muslims.
4
posted on
12/23/2017 8:16:47 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: davidb56
Trump should sign a EO requiring politicians to be on the front lines of any war.<like>
5
posted on
12/23/2017 8:22:24 AM PST
by
tomkat
To: markomalley
Maybe a better headline would have been “war is continuing”.
6
posted on
12/23/2017 8:23:03 AM PST
by
buckalfa
(Slip sliding away towards senility.)
To: markomalley
Good golly! Are we going to do the Norway thing every year? Marines have been going to Norway for a long, long time. I was there in the early eighties. Nice place, nice exercise, large exercise.
7
posted on
12/23/2017 8:25:54 AM PST
by
rey
To: markomalley
Newsflash: There’s always a war coming.
8
posted on
12/23/2017 8:30:16 AM PST
by
Stentor
To: Stentor
9
posted on
12/23/2017 8:40:43 AM PST
by
MNDude
(God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat)
To: MNDude
against who?
The Umma.
L
10
posted on
12/23/2017 8:42:45 AM PST
by
Lurker
(President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
To: markomalley
Since WWII, how many years have we not had troops engaged in combat?
We are at war now, unless this guy thinks a worse one will crop up in addition to what we are doing now.
To: markomalley
“Only the dead have seen the end of war”
12
posted on
12/23/2017 9:28:56 AM PST
by
varyouga
To: markomalley
Why would Russia attack Norway? Would they march across Finland and Sweden. The north route across Norway isn’t an option. Russia’s Army is a shadow of what it was. This sounds nuts.
13
posted on
12/23/2017 9:46:54 AM PST
by
Seruzawa
(TANSTAAFL!)
To: markomalley
Our military forces should be prepared for war at any minute. I don’t care if we go 100 years without having to fire a bullet, it doesn’t change the fact that they should be equipped and trained to go as soon as the call is made.
To: markomalley
The only reason we have Generals is because “War Is Coming”
To: Seruzawa
Yeah, the last time the Russkies took on Finland they pretty much got their clocks cleaned. It was only through over whelming numbers that they won.
16
posted on
12/23/2017 11:35:20 AM PST
by
jmacusa
("Made it Ma, top of the world!'')
To: davidb56
I think we should start with the Trump, Romney and Sununu families. Personally I’d also make assign them to an infantry division in a combat MOS...though at the battalion level it really doesn’t matter.
17
posted on
12/23/2017 11:37:59 AM PST
by
MSF BU
(Support the troops: Join Them.)
To: markomalley
According to the interviewed Western intelligence sources, Sweden and Finland would come under attack in the case of a real war against NATO. These attacks were also rehearsed in September. We know that, in case of a war with NATO, Russia would not expect Sweden and Finland to remain neutral, although they are not part of NATO. Stockholm and Helsinki would allow NATO aircraft to use their airfields and so on. The source alleged that most Swedish and southern Finish air fields would therefore come under Iskander missile attacks. The sources pointed towards the Murmansk region on the Kola peninsula, bordering on Finland and Norway. There were very interesting activities here, which makes us think that they were practicing something for northern Finland, but unfortunately I cannot tell you more, as we are not the source of this information. Pushed about the issue, the sources revealed that, during the Zapad 2017 exercise, Russian army forces from other parts of the country were moved to Kola that do not belong there. This makes us think that they did not just play out the scenario on the map, but also in real life. The point of this operational direction is to defend against NATO air attacks. So we think that they planned to neutralize assets in the region as well. In October, a Norwegian magazine reported, referring to six Norwegian defence establishment sources, that Russia had practiced bombing and invading Svalbard, the Norwegian archipelago in the Barents Sea, during Zapad 2017. According to the report, two waves of Tu-95 and Tu-22m3 bombers rehearsed bombing runs on the strategic islands between Russia and the resource-rich Arctic Ocean. 50 vessels participated in the drill in the Barents Sea. This confirms with what BILD learnt from its two Western intelligence sources. From Russias strategic perspective, it would be necessary to carry out parallel attacks on Finish and Norwegian mainland targets. http://www.bild.de/politik/ausland/bild-international/zapad-2017-english-54233658.bild.html
To: Seruzawa
The Soviet Army took a number of towns in Northern Norway from the Nazis during World War II. I am sure they are still capable of launching military operations in that area as they still maintain credible forces in the vicinity. They would attack Norway because it is part of NATO and to protect the ballistic submarine fleet stationed at Murmansk.
To: Viiksitimali
Get the flick out of NATO.
20
posted on
12/23/2017 3:12:02 PM PST
by
Chickensoup
(Leftists today are speaking as if they plan to commence to commit genocide against conservatives.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson