Odd decision, not good that an valid election can be overthrown if the judge does not like the result.
If there was no fraud, 1 vote majority is a victory.
If there is fraud, prove it and reject those votes = A many-vote victory for the honest voters.
The vote was a questionable one and that is why it was tossed out.
Nevada had a local election about 25 years ago that ended in a dead heat. With no provision for breaking a tie, the two candidates agreed to play a single hand of poker to determine the winner. LMAO.
Do you trust the Rats won on a one vote recount?
Odd decision, but valid within the law, I think.
The court decided that a ballot for the Republican was excluded that should not have been. That doesn’t mean fraud, but could simply have been misapplication of the rules - or even a judgment call the court disagreed with.
The law clearly foresaw such circumstances - given that they chose a coin flip to decide such cases.