Former US Attorney: Comey Threw Case Against Hillary Clinton – We Are in a Constitutional Crisis

thegatewaypundit ^ | Jim Hoft

[davikkm]

Former US Attorney Joe diGenova appeared on Tucker Carlson on Friday to discuss the ongoing Deep State witch hunt against President Trump.

DiGenova accused the Obama admininstration of conspiring to frame the incoming President of the United States.

Joe diGenova: Inside the FBI and Department of Justice under Obama was a brazen plot to do two things. To exonerate Hillary Clinton because of an animous for Donald Trump, and then if she lost to frame the incoming president for either a criminal act or impeachment. This is one of the most disgusting performances by the senior officials at the FBI and the Department of Justice that everyone of these agents should be fired and the people who are still in the Justice Department be fired including Mr. Ohr and they impanel a federal grand jury to investigate the conduct of McCabe and Strzok and Page and Comey and Ohr and everybody in the Obama Justice Department that even touched this. It’s very clear that they conspired to frame the incoming president of the United States.

[Religion and Politics]

If government employees acted in self interest or without guidance from superiors and failed to followed established laws, their actions and activities will be legally moot, and they too will be party to the lawbreaking. Any review of these matters give legal authority the opportunity to correct misdeeds by imposition of the appropriate law(s).

You mean like Sally Yates? And she gets treated like a "whistle blower" with immunity and hero status in the media and left? She took her kneel before she was shown the door for sure.

[Religion and Politics]

If government employees acted in self interest or without guidance from superiors and failed to followed established laws, their actions and activities will be legally moot, and they too will be party to the lawbreaking. Any review of these matters give legal authority the opportunity to correct misdeeds by imposition of the appropriate law(s).

You mean like Sally Yates? And she gets treated like a "whistle blower" with immunity and hero status in the media and left? She took her kneel before she was shown the door for sure.

[JohnG45]

While everyone is dicking around with this congressional investigation or that, the clock is running.

Yup, it’s all part of the plan.

[COUNTrecount]

Bookmark

[bramps]

Someone help with this point that I can’t figure out if you please. I am not being a contrarian. I detest every one of these rats and see the avalanche of lawlessness that deparately needs to be addressed. But...

Why did Comey come out and essentially put a dagger in Hillary’s campaign by coming out and very publicly announcing that they were once again looking into Hillary’s emails based on info from the Weiner investigation? Given his obvious willingness to be devious, why not just do it and shut up about it?

[Grampa Dave]

Gregg Jarrett: Did the FBI and the Justice Department, plot to clear Hillary Clinton, bring down Trump?
There is strong circumstantial evidence that an insidious plot unprecedented in American history was hatched within the FBI and the Obama Justice Department to help elect Hillary Clinton and defeat Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.

And when this apparent effort to improperly influence the election did not succeed, the suspected conspirators appear to have employed a fraudulent investigation of President Trump in an attempt to undo the election results and remove him as president.

Such a Machiavellian scheme would move well beyond what is known as the “deep state,” a popular reference to government employees who organize in secret to impose their own political views on government policy in defiance of democratically elected leadership.

However, this apparent plot to keep Trump from becoming president and to weaken and potentially pave the way for his impeachment with a prolonged politically motivated investigation – if proven – would constitute something far more nefarious and dangerous.

Such a plot would show that partisans within the FBI and the Justice Department, driven by personal animus and a sense of political righteousness, surreptitiously conspired to subvert electoral democracy itself in our country.

As of now, we have no proof beyond a reasonable doubt of such a plot. But we have very strong circumstantial evidence.

And as the philosopher and writer Henry David Thoreau wrote in his journal in 1850: “Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk.”

Newly revealed text messages about the apparent anti-Trump plot are the equivalent of a trout in the milk. It smells fishy.

Excerpted go the link below for full story:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/12/15/gregg-jarrett-did-fbi-and-justice-department-plot-to-clear-hillary-clinton-bring-down-trump.htm

[Grampa Dave]

Thanks to Travis Mcgee for the above!

[tomkat]

Is there ANY integrity in ANY of the outlets of the MSM, or in the Democrat party?

Assuming that question wasn't merely rhetorical, you already NO the answer to it.


             


Have been saying/posting this - with absolutely no hyperbole intended - for years.

[KavMan]

How come nobody in the media is calling Comey The Fixer for Hillary???

[Hotlanta Mike]

Excerpts:

Remember, too, that when Strzok was busy airbrushing Clinton’s email crimes, he would have known that, had the FBI done the right thing and indicted her for putting national security at risk, it would have crushed her campaign, and helped elect the man Strzok clearly felt should never be president.

In other words, Strzok had motive, means and opportunity to sabotage that investigation.

...

Days after the election, Page texted to say she bought “All the President’s Men,’’ a book about Nixon’s demise from the Watergate scandal, because “I needed to brush up on Watergate.’’

Explosive Texts Point To FBI, Not Russian, Meddling In 2016 Election

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/fbi-text-message-russia-clinton-email-investigations/

[bigbob]

Because many FReepers, like children, seem to think the world should operate on their time schedule.

[Hotlanta Mike]

Comey Should Be Indicted

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/12/comey_should_be_indicted.html

[Henry Hnyellar]

Please post this more often. I don’t see it enough.

[Liz]

(HAT TIP WALLY_KALBACKEN) A decision not to prosecute is not a matter that is res judicata. No jury was empaneled, so there is no double jeopardy issue. One prosecutor can choose not to indict or charge, but a successor can make the decision to charge. What people need to be looking at is any statute of limitations that could apply. While everyone is dicking around with this congressional investigation or that, the clock is running. Indict her soon!

Listen up, people.........the clock is running out.

The only problem might be what to indict her for.......her encyclopedia of crimes is stacked to high heaven as it is.

[Hotlanta Mike]

Get to know this name: Bill Priestap

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/941585613089857536.html

[ptsal]

Hillary is 70 years old +/- and I want her out of circulation for at least 15 years plus.

Make charge for a crime that will stick.

[onedoug]

The only thing Mueller’s investigation has uncovered thus far is that he’s the head of a criminal cartel.

[donozark]

Government by KGB. Excuse me, FBI....

[RitaOK]

Running the clock out is key to a successful corruption racket and for beating the rap. Clinton Inc is a master at it.

Like Al Capone, Hillary will probably have to get charged on some bubblegum rap to do a day of time, fine or consequence.

[Fantasywriter]

If Sessions can only find the backbone to charge one Obama-era criminal, I hope it’s Comey.