Posted on 12/15/2017 6:49:45 AM PST by a little elbow grease
(snip) -- Just what did two FBI agents, both of whom ended up on Robert Muellers special counsel probe, mean by having an insurance policy against a Donald Trump victory? Mueller later removed Peter Strzok when the text messages emerged from their private communications, and Lisa Page had left the probe earlier on her own, but the claim appears to reference a plan in August 2016 to use the power of the FBI to attack a newly elected president. Politico reports that Senate Judiciary chair Chuck Grassley wants answers from Rod Rosenstein ASAP:
(snip) --Question 5 is the big enchilada. Did the FBI really have reason to buy the dossier from Steele on the basis of legitimate counterespionage? Or did Strzok just decide he wanted an insurance policy to get Hillary Clinton elected?
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Good luck ... the country depends on guys like you.
A: federal prison B: Fort Marcy Park C: The bottom of the Potomac D: Witness protection program E: Qatar
I suppose this could be interpreted many ways, but I keep coming back to believing that Srtzok is referring to an assassination conspiracy.
The first thing I thought of was a s s a s s i n a t i o n. That’s when the average insurance policy [that involves an individual] kicks in: when the person dies.
Gmta.
The secret Iran deal and the State Dept's Muslim Engagement activities (as just two examples) undermines the safety and security of Americans and their families. More than likely, hidden in these documents are Obama's transmitting billions of tax dollars to his pals.....some very dangerous foreign despots.
==========================================
Clinton Struck Deal With Obama State Dept. to Keep Records Private
Washington Free Beacon ^ | 12/14/17 | Jack Heretik
Posted on 12/14/2017, 1:21:18 PM by x1stcav
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton struck a deal with the State Department while serving in the Obama administration that allowed her to take ownership of records she did not want made public, according to recently released reports.
Clinton and her then-deputy chief of staff Huma Abedin were permitted to remove electronic and physical records under a claim they were "personal" materials and "unclassified, non-record materials."
Judicial Watch made the revelation after filing a FOIA request with the State Department and obtaining a record of the agreement.
The newly released documents show the deal allowed Clinton and Abedin to remove documents related to particular calls and schedules, and the records would not be "released to the general public under FOIA." Abedin, for instance, was allowed to remove electronic records and five boxes of physical files, including files labeled "Muslim Engagement Documents."
The released records included a list of designated materials that "would not be released to the general public under FOIA" and were to be released "to the Secretary with this understanding."
Electronic copy of "daily files" which are word versions of public documents and non-records: speeches/press statements/photos from the website, a non-record copy of the schedule, a non record copy of the call log, press clips, and agenda of daily activities
Electronic copy of a log of calls the Secretary made since 2004, it is a non-record, since her official calls are logged elsewhere (official schedule and official call log) Electronic copy of the Secretarys "call grid" which is a running list of calls she wants to make (both personal and official)
16 boxes: Personal Schedules (1993 thru 2008-prior to the Secretarys tenure at the Department of State.
29 boxes: Miscellaneous Public Schedules during her tenure as FLOTUS and Senator-prior to the Secretarys tenure at the Department of State 1 box: Personal Reimbursable receipts (6/25/2009 thru 1/14/2013) 1 box: Personal Photos 1 box: Personal schedule (2009-2013)
A physical file of "the log of the Secretarys gifts with pictures of gifts" was also handed over to Clinton. Gifts received by government employees is highly regulated, and often strictly limited. However, gifts that are "motivated by a family relationship or personal friendship" may be accepted without limitation.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton released a statement condemning the agreement between the government and Clinton. "We already know the Obama State Department let Hillary Clinton steal and then delete her government emails, which included classified information. But these new records show that was only part of the scandal," Fitton said. "These new documents show the Obama State Department had a deal with Hillary Clinton to hide her calls logs and schedules, which would be contrary to FOIA and other laws."
"When are the American people going to get an honest investigation of the Clinton crimes?" he added.
That was also my first thought. It doesn’t take much to jump to that conclusion!
"Call me crazy, but I dont think the story here is Republican zooming. No one expects people who work in government to be completely apolitical, not even in law enforcement. Most of the text messages released so far appear to be the same kind of political venting in which many Americans indulge in both private and public."
_________________
"Most of the text messages released so far appear to be the same kind of political venting in which many Americans indulge in both private and public."
--- Are you an *sshole, Ed? This smirking, punkly guy Strzok and his female squeeze had some very important jobs to do. Ed, get your head out of your rectum...... take a deep breath and then say something intelligent.
Thats a question i cant get out of my mind
What was the FBI “insurance policy” against Donald Trump being elected?
Was there a threat on his life?
Was it the fake dossier and a scheme to use “’Russia” and character assassination?
What was “ the insurance policy”?????
That’s a very interesting question that has got to be asked: is this “insurance policy” a plot to asassinate? Insurance policies generally kick in upon the death of the insured. Mr. Strzok, are you now or have you ever been aware of a plot to asassinate Donald Trump, as a candidate, prior to his inauguration or after his inauguration as President of the United States?
________
It did sound something like that to me, I must admit.
I hope these creatures are not that evil, but since they were WITH HILLARY, I wouldn't put it past them.
One more thought ............. where is Seth Rich?
Is he a lone wolf or there’s someone who is leading from behind?
Thank you.
I won’t click on HotAir anymore until they fire Analpundit, but Ed hits on a blockbuster revelation. I don’t know how anyone reads this any other way than that the FBI took illegal steps to overturn an election.
Hopefully, it’s Katie Johnson, whom Gloria Allred’s spawn Lisa Bloom was representing until the claimaint dropped the accusations.
Then the deep swamp will be busted trying to frame CINC.
"When are the American people going to get an honest investigation of the Clinton crimes?" he added.
__________
Soon........... right before Groundhog Day, 2018.
No doubt that they are hard at work formulating a totally “innocent explanation” that the Democrats and the lamestream media can run with.
Exactly. In addition to Seth Rich, there is a trail of bodies behind the Clintons a mile long. Another one just turned up murdered: the surgeon who blew the whistle on the Clintons’ Haitian fraud. He was knifed to death.
The Deep State does whatever it deems necessary. Prayers for Trump’s ongoing safety.
Gowdy’s a showboat angling for headlines but he could make a name for himself by asking Strzok if he’s aware of any plot to asassinate Donald Trump. If he answers no he’s lying, there are always nutters plotting. He can’t answer yes. All he can do is plead the fifth.
This is the top of the totem pole investigative team. Every jot and tittle will be examined.
IMHO, the Mueller team has flunked the test.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.