Bombshell: Roy Moore Accuser Beverly Nelson Admits She Forged Yearbook

Breitbart ^ | December 8, 2017 | John Nolte

[Trump20162020]

Beverly Young Nelson has finally admitted that she forged a portion of the infamous high school yearbook that she and attorney Gloria Allred used as proof of her accusations against U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore.

And in yet another blow to the credibility of ABC News, the disgraced, left-wing network downplayed the bombshell by presenting this admission of forgery as adding “notes” to the inscription.

[Political Junkie Too]

I agree that her whole narrative is suspect now, but I'm not inclined to discard the yearbook signature. It still indicates that he was acquainted with Nelson. However, that says nothing about the veracity of her narrative, which is now not believable.

-PJ

[Political Junkie Too]

One cannot summarily dismiss the yearbook signature, since it is too compellingly similar to the graduation card. It only indicates that he was acquainted with Nelson. However, that says nothing about the veracity of her narrative, which is now not believable. Moore knew her, but her story of attempted assault must be dismissed.

-PJ

[Robert A Cook PE]

But, it it “Roy (Moore DA)... Or “Ray” as in rhymes with “I cannot say”? There is no clear snswer, is there?

[Political Junkie Too]

From the similarities in the pictures, unless Gibson knew the same "Ray," it's "Roy." Unless they are both lying that the "Roy" is Moore.

All I'm saying is that I can't wish away the physical evidence of acquaintance, even though I don't believe the stories of anything beyond dating.

-PJ

[lonevoice]

Insanity!

[MamaB]

If anyone has posted the whole page on FB, I have not seen it. Someone did post that there was a student in the class of 77, with the same name. It was added to, to make it appear that Candidate Moore signed everything.

[Brown Deer]

Nothing whatsoever about it on Drudge.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

I’ve been cool towards the “Ray” theory, myself. But as TigerClaws pointed out in #49,

The wording is very odd. Until you realize it was a high school kid poem.

“To a sweeter girl I could not say

Merry Christmas,

Love, Ray”

Walt Whitman it ain’t.

But I have to say that that rhyme certainly unifies that little composition.

[Alberta's Child]

I agree that her whole narrative is suspect now, but I'm not inclined to discard the yearbook signature. It still indicates that he was acquainted with Nelson.

There is no evidence that Moore was acquainted with Nelson.

The issue isn't whether the signature (in full or in part) is Moore's. The issue is whether Moore actually wrote it himself, or if it was copied from somewhere else.

I have no trouble believing that someone copied his signature from a legal document that was signed and initialed by "D.A." (his assistant Delbra Adams). Since Nelson has already admitted that she fabricated part of the "signature," I'd say with almost 100% certainty that this was exactly what happened.

[Brown Deer]

Ray Brooks, Southside High School, Class of 1979

[Brown Deer]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3606260/posts?page=108#108

[Phillyred]

Meep meep!

[HotHunt]

Great idea.

[Political Junkie Too]

So you believe that both women, one with a yearbook and the other with a graduation card, both copied the same "Roy" with the same penmanship styles in the bodies of the separate inscriptions?

Did you look closely at both photos?

-PJ

[Shethink13]

So you believe that both women, one with a yearbook and the other with a graduation card, both copied the same "Roy" with the same penmanship styles in the bodies of the separate inscriptions?

If I might interject - I don’t know if I necessarily believe that “both women” copied Moore’s handwriting style, but I sure as heck believe someone who is coordinating this attack is responsible for both forgeries.

So I guess you believe that 2 women who were silent for 40 years through all the political battles that Roy Moore has been through realized at the same time that they have some kind of written documentation that proves he is a child sexual predator.

I ask you - which of these two scenarios is more credible?

[Alberta's Child]

I didn't say anything about the graduation card. That card can be perfectly legitimate (and there's nothing about it that necessarily reflects poorly on Moore).

The question at hand here involves the yearbook.

Why didn't Roy Moore write his full name and "D.A." on the graduation card? Probably because he didn't sign personal notes that way -- which is why I suspect the entire signature in Nelson's yearbook (not just the part she admitted she added herself) is phony. Why would someone write "Love, Roy Moore, D.A." in a yearbook but only "Roy" on a personal card? Wouldn't he be more likely to write "Love, Roy" if he really knew the girl personally?

Something else to consider about the Beverly Nelson story is that there is no evidence, other than Nelson's own word, that the message is actually written in HER yearbook. You'll note that -- unlike the graduation message to "Debbie" -- there is no reference to the name "Beverly" in the yearbook message.

Now I'm wondering if this was a message from Roy Moore to someone else entirely, and Nelson added the 1977 date and the name of the restaurant in an attempt to fabricate a story that it was written to her.

[Political Junkie Too]

So I guess you believe that 2 women who were silent for 40 years through all the political battles that Roy Moore has been through realized at the same time that they have some kind of written documentation that proves he is a child sexual predator.

I believe that both were written by the same hand. So far, I have made no speculation beyond that.

I'm pleased that you interjected and joined the conversation, because I don't recall seeing you in prior threads; that could just be me. Anyway, if you have seen my prior arguments, you'd know that I don't think what you postulated.

I'm trying to sort through the possibilities without prematurely biasing my conclusion.

-PJ

[Political Junkie Too]

I didn't say anything about the graduation card. 

You did not, but I did in the original post that I pinged to you, so I presumed that you would consider that as context in your reply. Ignoring it is as much a message as responding to it.

there is no evidence, other than Nelson's own word, that the message is actually written in HER yearbook. 

That is wrong.

There is the circumstantial evidence of two separate and distinct inscriptions written by the same hand, and both being attributed to Roy Moore.

If we postulate that they were not written by Moore, then we have to close the loop and explain who did write it. If it was written by Moore, it's okay to admit that he doesn't remember every person he met 30 years ago in his career as an attorney and a judge, because he interacted with so many people in his career.

But an honest review of the data cannot simply sweep it aside as discredited.

-PJ

[Alberta's Child]

All good points. But go to my last point about think about that for a second. Why would Beverly Nelson feel a need to add a date, location and a "D.A." inscription to this? (It's clear from the graphic that the date and location weren't the only things added later; everything after "Roy" was added.)

I'll give you a good reason why she added all of those things: It wasn't her yearbook and/or he didn't write the message to her and/or the message wasn't written in 1977. She -- or someone else -- added all of those things to lend credibility to her story, not realizing that the "D.A." initials lifted from another legal document he signed later had nothing to do with his title as District Atttorney but were the initials of his assistant Delba Adams.

[Alberta's Child]

Just for clarification ... I’m suggesting that maybe he DID write the inscription but it wasn’t written for HER.