1 posted on
12/05/2017 5:30:20 AM PST by
blam
To: blam
Put crescents on the vans, too.
To: blam
Don’t they have to get rid of the red cross first? Red crescent? Red sickle? Red Alfred E. Newman?
To: blam
Um, Red CROSS! It’s like KFC being asked not to mention that their product is chicken.
CC
4 posted on
12/05/2017 5:35:11 AM PST by
Celtic Conservative
(It don't matter if your heart is in the right place, if at the same time your head is up your a$$)
To: blam
Typical Soros organization.
To: blam
The Salvation Army is still a Christian organization. The Red Cross diverts donations intended for victims of disasters, and sends it to the perpetrators of the disasters.
8 posted on
12/05/2017 5:41:59 AM PST by
BykrBayb
(Lung cancer free since 11/9/07. Colon cancer free since 7/7/15. Obama free since 1/20/17. PTL ~ Þ)
To: blam
Volunteers have criticised the Red Cross charity after receiving a communication telling them to remove crucifixes from the walls of their branches as the organisation looks to become more secular. Who would ever complain about this? The obvious solution is to stop volunteering.
Am I missing something here?
18 posted on
12/05/2017 5:54:52 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
To: blam
I will never again give another dime or a drop of blood to the Red Cross.
19 posted on
12/05/2017 5:57:20 AM PST by
Little Ray
(Freedom Before Security!)
To: blam
Is this headed in the direction of changing the name and logo to The Red X ?
25 posted on
12/05/2017 6:13:23 AM PST by
Rebelbase
(The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false-face for the urge to rule it.-- H.L. Mencken)
To: blam
They need to change their name.
Luke 9:26 For whosoever shall be ashamed of me and of my words, of him shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he shall come in his own glory, and in his Father’s, and of the holy angels.
To: blam
IF they MUST comply, replace the “offensive?” items with RED CROSSES!
34 posted on
12/05/2017 6:56:42 AM PST by
faucetman
(Ju"st the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
To: blam
On a side note, I would partially agree if it were just “crucifixes”.
1. Christ isn’t on the cross, why depict Him as if He still were. It should be an “empty” cross, just like the “empty” tomb.
2. Crucifixes are graven images amounting to “idols”.
Like I said, make them RED!
35 posted on
12/05/2017 7:09:16 AM PST by
faucetman
(Ju"st the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
To: blam
because of the Muslims Of course it was. Everything these days is to appease muzzies.
36 posted on
12/05/2017 7:29:24 AM PST by
bgill
(CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
To: blam
Red Cross been off our donate-to list for a couple decades.....
37 posted on
12/05/2017 7:32:29 AM PST by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: blam
Will you ask the Red Crescent to remove crescents? If not, why not? Is it because you don’t want your head removed from your body?
41 posted on
12/05/2017 9:35:21 AM PST by
Deplorable American1776
(Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
To: blam
Huh?
What are they going to do with the cross, the Red one?
5.56mm
43 posted on
12/05/2017 9:41:43 AM PST by
M Kehoe
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson