Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Another little win. They're adding up.
1 posted on 12/04/2017 5:16:26 PM PST by x1stcav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: x1stcav

w i n n i n g

This is what it looks like.


2 posted on 12/04/2017 5:17:48 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell / Ryan: Why pass Cons legislation when we can pass Leftist legislation for Leftists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: x1stcav

“”Another little win. They’re adding up.””

And they’re making me nervous. I can’t help but feel that there are more shoes to drop and we are NOT going to like it! I thought the Bimbo from Huntington Beach with the lawsuit against Trump was gone for good but it appears Gloria has her fangs in her and is going to drag her all the way to court. I want to see Gloria learn the hard way - that will be a day to celebrate.


3 posted on 12/04/2017 5:24:29 PM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: x1stcav; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; ...

ping


5 posted on 12/04/2017 5:36:50 PM PST by bitt (press takes him literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: x1stcav

This is a step in the right direction, but I hope Judicial Watch is prepared to fight hard to keep it moving.

Personally, I think it will end up in the Supreme Court, since it hinges on the question of whether a state or city or region has the right to reject federal law just because they don’t like it. There are legal ways of challenging it, but SF and the other “sanctuary cities” never followed any legal process and simply ordered their employees not to obey.


6 posted on 12/04/2017 6:32:14 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: x1stcav

Does anyone know anyone on the Judicial Watch team?

In addition to their current filing on a sanctuary city matter, I think there is a good approach that challenges all sanctuary city laws on Constitutional grounds, as denial of “equal protection of the law”.

If a citizen is wanted for apprehension on a federal charge, a “sanctuary city” does not proscribe their authorities from cooperation and assisting the federal authorities in that apprehension. But “sanctuary city” laws establish illegally resident non-citizens as a special class deserving of “protection” in the form of local official’s non-cooperation with federal authorities. In a “sanctuary city” the illegal non-citizen is privileged above any citizen who may be sought by federal authorities.

It’s clearly denial of equal protection of the law.


9 posted on 12/04/2017 8:46:19 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson