Skip to comments.
Cathay Pacific crew saw North Korean missile from plane, airline says
cnn ^
Posted on 12/04/2017 7:29:01 AM PST by BenLurkin
Cathay said in a statement that it had been in contact with relevant authorities, industry bodies and other airlines about what was seen from Cathay Pacific flight 893, and at the moment there were no plans to change flight routes.
"Though the flight was far from the event location, the crew advised Japan ATC (Air Traffic Control) according to procedures. Operation remained normal and was not affected," the statement said.
...
On July 28, an Air France flight passed just east of the splashdown site of a missile test, roughly five to 10 minutes before the weapon hit the water. At the time of the splashdown, the flight was about 60 to 70 miles (95 to 112 kilometers) north of where the missile landed, according to a review of the data.
...
The chance of an unaimed missile striking a plane are "billions to one," according to CNN aviation safety analyst David Soucie.
But if a ballistic missile were to come close to a passenger jet, it would be nearly impossible for the crew to detect, a Hong Kong-based pilot told CNN in August in the aftermath of that missile test.
"You wouldn't even know it was coming," he said, speaking anonymously as he was not authorized by his employer to discuss sensitive matters.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: cathaypacific; missile; northkorea
1
posted on
12/04/2017 7:29:01 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Watch out for sparks in your center fuel tank.
2
posted on
12/04/2017 7:32:35 AM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(Benedict McCain is the worst traitor ever to wear the uniform of the US military.)
To: ClearCase_guy
3
posted on
12/04/2017 7:33:06 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
The chance of an unaimed missile striking a plane are "billions to one," according to CNN aviation safety analyst David Soucie.
at those odds, I'll take a 5 dollar flier on an opened ended bet.
4
posted on
12/04/2017 7:33:23 AM PST
by
stylin19a
(Best.Election.Ever.)
To: BenLurkin
Apparently, the pilot had his cell phone camera handy when this event happened...
5
posted on
12/04/2017 7:38:14 AM PST
by
C210N
(It is easier to fool the people than convince them that they have been fooled)
To: C210N
6
posted on
12/04/2017 7:39:31 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
It's understandable that Kim has been able to accomplish this feat. He's well practiced.
7
posted on
12/04/2017 7:47:26 AM PST
by
C210N
(It is easier to fool the people than convince them that they have been fooled)
To: BenLurkin
Every launch now must be shot down. We can never be certain as to which one will be “The One”.
8
posted on
12/04/2017 8:27:16 AM PST
by
Don Corleone
(.leave the gun, take the canolis, take it to the mattress.)
To: BenLurkin
I would like to at least see a picture of an ICBM erupting from the clouds at over 5,000 mph on it’s way to 15,000 mph.
9
posted on
12/04/2017 9:13:49 AM PST
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Mariner
One night in 1983, I had two students, each in his own plane (F-15) doing night intercept training. We went to middle of the training area (next to Mexican border west of Tucson). Split off one to the west and took one with me to the east. After a minute I looked to the west and saw a fire plume. Asked the student if he was in afterburner. He denied. Turned out it was a missile launch from Vandenburg that went south towards Mexico instead of southwest, they had to blow it up.
10
posted on
12/04/2017 9:26:59 AM PST
by
DaveArk
To: DaveArk
Do you have any buddies still in service who are flying the F-35?
I am very interested in first-hand reports.
11
posted on
12/04/2017 9:57:20 AM PST
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Mariner
Negative, my class had it’s 40th reunion last year. It’s been a long time. :)
12
posted on
12/04/2017 10:09:58 AM PST
by
DaveArk
To: Mariner
I would like to at least see a picture of an ICBM erupting from the clouds at over 5,000 mph on its way to 15,000 mph. Most ICBMs breaking through the tops of even the highest clouds are traveling a little over mach one.
13
posted on
12/04/2017 10:58:02 AM PST
by
OldMissileer
(Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
To: DaveArk
Turned out it was a missile launch from Vandenburg that went south towards Mexico instead of southwest, they had to blow it up. If the missile was that far off course some heads must have rolled back at Vandyland. Of all the Range Safety Officers there is a Back Azimuth and Side Azimuth Officer that watch the flight VERY closely. They have video monitors with a line that indicates the proper flight trajectory and then another line on each side that indicates the maximum deflection the flight may have before it must be destroyed.
Heading towards Mexico meant the Side Az Officer really screwed the pooch.
14
posted on
12/04/2017 11:04:08 AM PST
by
OldMissileer
(Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
To: OldMissileer
15
posted on
12/04/2017 11:16:49 AM PST
by
DaveArk
To: OldMissileer; Mariner
Most ICBMs breaking through the tops of even the highest clouds are traveling a little over mach one.ABMs OTOH...
16
posted on
12/05/2017 5:29:46 PM PST
by
no-s
(when democracy is displaced by tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote...)
To: no-s
ABMs OTOH... True, but ABMs are a totally different animal. They have to be fast out of the hole.
17
posted on
12/05/2017 6:20:32 PM PST
by
OldMissileer
(Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson