Lets git ‘er done this month, folks!
...finding the Second Amendment doesn’t guarantee a right to open carry.
It’s interesting that with all the Education these Black Robed Tyrants have been exposed to they cannot comprehend the meaning of the phrase “Shall Not Be Infringed”.
The 2nd. doesn’t mention how you can ‘bear’ arms but the word itself suggests open carry. How did they carry muskets back in the day?
is this winning?
But immediately and by fiat, any man who feels like a woman can use a female bathroom.
No exceptions. No waiting periods. No bans on “scary men” etc. Period. Enforced within within a week.
Cause it is a Constitutional Right - undiscovered for 230 years.
What the hell?
Lets git ‘er done this month, folks!
Fla. SC denied actual history by ruling the semi auto weapons are inherently military. The Remington Models 8 and 81 and the Winchester 7 were in civilian hands 30 years before the Army adopted the M1 Garand.
So, we’ll stay in a holding pattern until some Leftists justices die off and Trump appoints replacements. Maybe that’s OK, as long as you stay out of Leftists-controlled states like MD, MA, CT, RI, NY, NJ, IL, OR, CA, and HI.
This court, even with Justice Gorsuch now on the bench, is still razor thin on keeping our 2nd Amend. rights safe. It now would be erasing this Amendment had Hillary won. Pres. Trump in for 4 years is a good turn of events. We have to hope the 2018 and 2020 elections do not go towards the liberal socialist Democrats.
Such denials are not necessarily bad. SCOTUS has to work with the case at hand, which isn’t always what you want national case law built on (say, mass murderer trying to beat a “possession of an assault weapon” violation).
They left open the possibility of taking the issues up later, after another conservative is appointed to the SC.
Need to get 2-3 more SCOTUS seats for Trump....
You can bear arms plain and simple. Carry on your shoulder, carry it in your hands. fasten it to your wagon, holster with your horse, put in your rucksack. What convincing argument is there that the Founders meant otherwise?
They were men of common sense, not tricksters trying to formulate some complicated "code phrase" that needed delicate parsing.
The SCOTUS will not hear such controversial cases such as denied individual right of the Second Amendment. So much for their oath of office. What good is the SCOTUS to the American people?
This ruling says that any state in the Union can ban any firearm they determine to be a “military” or “assault” weapon.
What could the 2nd Amendment possibly be referring to more clearly than a “military” firearm?
I’m concerned with upholding the “assault weapon” ban for several reasons:
It invites further distortion of the term “assault weapon”.
It emboldens other states to attempt such restrictions.
Expanded restrictions invite open rebellion.
Denied justice is injustice.
Maryland “Freak State” PING!