Charles Manson Was an Evolutionist

Creation Evolution Headlines ^ | November 22, 2017 | David F. Coppedge

[fishtank]

November 22, 2017 | David F. Coppedge

Charles Manson Was an Evolutionist

Few Darwinians would condone murder, of course, but the Manson case shows what can happen to someone who puts their faith in the teachings of Darwin and his disciples.

Well, after 45 years in prison for the heinous murders he instigated, Charles Manson has finally met his Maker. Many in the public have held a kind of horrified fascination for the cult hero whose “Manson family” shocked the world in 1969 with some of the bloodiest, cruelist, most senseless murders known up to that time. How many who have followed the case, though, realize that the motivations for his murderous rampage included the teachings of Nietzsche, a fervent disciple of Darwin? Even conservative news reports often overlook that point (example on WND). Jerry Bergman (a CEH contributor) connects the dots in his book, How Darwinism Corrupts Morality.

[Paradox]

I could use fewer posts like this.

This one is particularly embarrassing.

[Theodore R.]

It’s unfortunate that so many Americans agree with Manson on Darwinism.

[JimRed]

And now he’s plant Nutritionist.

Only if cremated and ashes spread among vegetation, or if left to rot in field or forest. Many or most of us do not get back into the ecosystem.

[cdcdawg]

180 degrees off.

[BenLurkin]

He also advocated racial segregation.

[BenLurkin]

Manson would have bought into the “bell curve” concept.

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Last I heard, the prison folks didn’t know where to plant him.
Maybe mail him to Kansas to be planted next to Smith & Hickock.

[qam1]

I could use fewer posts like this.

Well look at the bright side, the more he/she/it is posting these crazy articles in here, the less time he/she/it is out there in the real world scaring people away from Conservatism.

[Governor Dinwiddie]

These arguments are moronic. This is what the author is trying to convey:

1. Charles Manson was an evolutionist.
2. Charles Manson was insane.
3. All evolutionists are insane.

This is clearly malformed, faulty logic.

I am not an evolutionist. I believe God created the world and all that is in it.

However it makes no sense to use such ridiculous appeals to advance a Creationist agenda. It just makes the author look stupid silly.

[Terry Mross]

Mason and Sherman agreed. And they were both right. Blacks cannot govern themselves. They’ve taken over the southern city governments and look at the shape they’re in. Not racist. Just fact.

[alexander_busek]

I think this post is trying to say that because Charles Manson was a bad person, and he was an evolutionist, that, therefore, evolution is wrong. Which is a logical fallacy. Hitler was a the-sun-is-going-to-rise-tommorowist, which doesn’t mean the sun won’t rise tomorrow, or that being a the-sun-is-going-to-rise-tommorowist is a wrong belief.

The formal name of this fallacy is Reductio ad Hitlerum.

Regards,

[Venkman]

Fish Tank is the name of a movie about a man who has sex with a minor. Therefore all people named fishtank are ... logic deficient?

[Moonman62]

A lot of theists also believe evolution is true.

[Moonman62]

Yes, crooked politicians have been driving morality out of society for decades so they can get away with their own corruption. Please don’t blame science.

[alstewartfan]

Shocking! lol I thought that he became a murderer after attending a Billy Graham crusade.

[fishtank]

THat’s on my list....

[alstewartfan]

Hitler was another Darwinist, surprise surprise! As are all the Commie butchers. With no God, everything is permissible.

[fishtank]

Yeah.... the author is way too kind to Darwinists.....

it’s a PP death cult.

[alstewartfan]

No, it does not. It logically follows that Darwinists think that human life has no value, except for whatever *I* decide.