Compared to the one you posted:
Some deception somewhere. Will reserve my opinion. Whoever is holding the copy in the Newser one it could have been transformed to black and white easily. Who would put the date on twice?
Posted on 11/14/2017 10:41:48 AM PST by scooby321
Personally, from all the stuff being said, it’s all BS....
I want to see the rest of the yearbook. Was this the only annotated inscription?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I’d like to see it too - was it even her yearbook? Evidently, Gloria Allfraud won’t let anybody touch it .... gee, I wonder why not .... speaks volumes as to whether it’s all genuine or not.
ANYBODY who has Gloria representing them is automatically ‘suspect’ & a likely fraud, IMO - Gloria has not a shred of credibility left (neither does daughter Lisa Bloom).
In one of the earlier threads, Gloria Alred supposedly said she would not let the yearbook be examined by experts.
That raises another ‘red’ flag.
The yearbook raises several questions regarding the handwriting. To me, it looks like the comment about Christmas and possibly the ‘Roy’ signature are different from the ‘Moore’ part. The 12-22-77 line and the Old(e) Hickory appear to be different from the Christmas notation handwriting. Also, the ‘Roy’ and ‘Moore’ do not seem to be on the same plane. The ‘Moore’ signature and DA are slightly higher than the ‘Roy’ signature. Of course, that may be due to the image and the entire writing being at an angle.
What would be the point of locking the door if he had her pinned? Don’t believe rubbish.
Of course it’s fake.
CHILD SAFETY door locks (that prevent children in the BACK seat from opening their doors) came on the scene in the early eighties. This is different from automated locking of ALL doors from the driver’s position. Locking the doors from the driver’s position does NOT prevent the passengers from being able to unlock/open their doors from their position.
And again, CHILD SAFETY DOOR LOCKS are only for rear doors, NOT from passenger doors.
Compared to the one you posted:
Some deception somewhere. Will reserve my opinion. Whoever is holding the copy in the Newser one it could have been transformed to black and white easily. Who would put the date on twice?
OK...I haven’t been able to find when power door locks were placed in cars...Only the Wikipedia I found for the child safety locks in the early ‘80’s...
Yearbooks don’t come out at Christmas
Nor do you sign them then
I'm not so sure at all. The word "Roy" and the word "Moore" are different colored ink. It appears someone named "Roy" signed her yearbook and the the words "Moore, DA" were added later."I think Roy Moore signed the page.”
Note that Mr. Moore was never the DA, he was the Deputy District Attorney - IOW, “DDA” rather than “DA.”If Moore exaggerated his credentials, and if he was guilty of pedo behavior at that time, well - what do you expect of a Democrat?
Rush made the point today that in the time frame of the allegations now lodged against him, Roy Moore was a Democrat. Wiki agrees:
Moore quit his prosecuting position to run as a Democrat for the county's circuit-court judge seat in 1982.. . . Judge Moore ran as a Republican in the 1994 Etowah County election and was elected to the circuit judge seat (6 year term) with 62% of the vote. He was the first county-wide Republican to win since the Reconstruction.
Black and blue ink.
No doubt.
“Who would put the date on twice?”
My first thought.
Also, the addition of “Moore D.A. etc” seem to fall away. They are not on the same angle as the first lines.
It's hard to dispute that authenticity.
-PJ
Thought the same thing.
It's hard to dispute that authenticity.
Are you suggesting that someone can't add stuff to a photo?
I'm suggesting that if they did, it was CNN or AFP/Getty, because CNN's twitter link is where I got the photo, and AFP/Getty signed it.
-PJ
Copies of yearbooks can be found. It could have been from a prior year. Only the contents would reveal the year and possibly the owner. I don't think I would have caught that btw, good observation.
So, Getty took a photo of what CNN/WAPO found in order to legitimize the thing?
There’s no chance in the world that Getty has a photo of this Yearbook page prior to this “Discovery”.
Why is Getty even there?
This is a set-up.
I was involved peripherally in a legal case. I knew the signature was a forgery and probably more than one signature.. A couple lawyers, one for the defense, I knew told me to leave it alone, law is different from reality when it comes to trials and juries (in so many words).
I'm still mad I wasn't believed even though I don't have creds. Got some pointers from the internet and zoomed samples up in PS To me, it was defrauding an insurance company even if the intention would have been the same.
CNN posted the image on their own Twitter feed.
You are over-thinking this. If it is a setup, it is a fraud of CNN's making for passing off a doctored photo as fake news.
Is that what you are suggesting, because it is not what I'm suggesting. I'm saying that CNN posted the photo without taking a closer look at the details.
If it is a setup of CNN's making, it's a very bad one that's destined to fail and destroy the accusers' credibility. Is that what you're suggesting?
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.