[af_vet_1981]

I watched that entire exchange. I thought he won over Rep. Jordan at the end the same way he did me:

I'm still looking for a full transcript, but as I recall:
The issue was whether to appoint a new special counsel. AG Sessions discussed the criteria required to do that, and IIRC, whether or not to recuse. My takeaway was that the criteria for a special counsel would apply if the DOJ was incapable of doing its job. Near the end, AG Sessions made a point that we have a new, capable, and full of integrity Director of the FBI. I thought I saw the light bulb go on in Rep. Jordan's eyes.

[heights]

“I watched that entire exchange. I thought he won over Rep. Jordan at the end the same way he did me:”

What color is the sky on your planet?

[Magnum44]

Your thought addresses a question of mine for some time. I have wondered why we would need a special prosecutor when we have the FBI? The FBI can investigate and indict all by themselves. We just need them to do that. And IF they are doing their job, we wont know until the indictments come down.

The issue is people want to know that the FBI is doing its job, because they have failed so badly under the last admin. And people are looking for proof of that. Lacking that proof, they want to make sure an independent investigation is occurring. So do we sit by patiently or keep pounding on the table?