Posted on 11/08/2017 6:18:30 AM PST by tje
....Trump’s famous “because you’d be in jail” line is constantly rotated throughout the Internet via memes and videos on social media to this day; however, what many seem to have forgotten is the first part of Trump’s statement: he promised to assign a special prosecutor to look into Clinton’s crimes...
... I believe Trump was finalizing his decision to appoint Mueller as his special prosecutor to investigate Clinton. Don’t believe it? Keep reading.
(Excerpt) Read more at lizcrokin.com ...
Read 34.
So true and maybe the Mueller/Trump strategy is just to go after all the Republicans first since not one Democrat has been indicted. LOL!
See 34.
I LOVE the visual of McCain and Hillary in their matching boots...Hmmmmmm
Think it through, it’s a perfect setup, check out the link in post 34.
Let’s try an analogy. Suppose you and your spouse own a small business and you suspect one of the employees is stealing. Who would you ask to investigate, your spouse or a private investigator? Your spouse who is 100% on your side, has an equal stake in the outcome, but that might be used to challenge their objectivity when they had to testify in court. On the other hand, a private investigator would be seen as unbiased, professional, and without a “dog in the fight”.
And that’s why Mueller did not fill his staff with pro-Trump investigators.
My opinion, from out here in the Hinterlands, is that Liz is doing what so many do. She has reconfigured facts and innuendo to fit a narrative of what she wants to happen. You don’t win bets betting on what you want to happen, you win bets betting on what the facts say will happen.
I have bet for 30 years that the Clintons would never be honestly prosecuted. And I’ve never lost. And I’m not going to lose now.
So the claim is that the Mueller/Trump alliance is NOT secret but out in the open?
I would be thrilled to eat Texas-sized crow burgers on this matter. But it isn’t going to happen.
Yeh you just keep listening to your pal “ you know who” who is busy today trying to splain how he ever thought Ed Gillespie was going to win in VA. LOL!
I’m sure Mueller will indict the Podesta’s, Blabbermouth Schultz and Hillary any day now. LMAO!
An 80 year old with terminal brain cancer is a flight risk?
Hillary too? Where are they going to go?
They are under “secret” house arrest?
This is silly.
Alma | November 7, 2017 at 2:09 pm | Reply
Worry none dear friend, the clock is ticking for the three “subjects” so well you have described and soon they will go away, Killary Rotten Clinton is now the midnight clown and they use her as a stand in just in case, she’s got nowhere else to go, she’s a reject from her ole party, she’s got flyes in her pampers; ABEL mcCAIN seems to be coming apart at the seams, he’ll keel over in D.C. and Poppy Bush, the eternal “dirty ole goat” slimy bastard telling off color jokes to young women is waiting for the first two to go before him.
Mueller has known about the crooked and dangerous Uranium One deal and he said nothing for eight years. He should have done the right thing back around 2009 or 2010 and not participate in a cover up.
To apply that analogy to this particular case, what if Rosenstein/Mueller were indeed, as many surmise, the deep state set-up to get Trump? Well, what would you personally do if caught unawares in that type of situation? Sit down and cry and wait for the ax to fall?
Or, would you consider your options and identify the enemy's weak point(s)? What's the famous phrase, 'money is the mother's milk of politics'? So, in this situation, Trump of course would track down the money source funding these kinds of attacks.
The logical place would be the KSA. And, wouldn't you know it, it seems the money spigot funding such antics as the planned Anti-FA riots has been cut-off due perhaps to the recent purges taking place.
Now, stay with me here, because what if KSA money was part of the Clinton foundation money laundering scheme? And, if as many claim, Rosenstein/Mueller were part & parcel of covering up the U1 scheme as well, which dovetails into the Clinton's taking over the DNC, then wouldn't Trump be holding a pretty strong hand if the evidence was in his possession?
I, for one, am not particularly concerned whether Mueller was part of some grand game from the git-go, has been turned, or is still pursuing Trump. None of it really matters, because Trump still has the strongest hand. He's got enough (financial) information on every corrupt deep-state player to hang them out every which way until Sunday.
It does make sense. Mueller resigned over Obama/Clinton corruption. He is cold and calculating. Wait for it.
Is it “a Mueller/Trump secret alliance”??
Says who??
Why leap to that conclusion with no evidence?
Meuller was shut down by Obama just like Lynch was, and maybe this is his time to be unleashed and take care of what he wasn’t allowed to take care of then. There doesn’t have to be a Trump/Mueller “secret alliance” at all.
HER cannot hire any of the above mentioned legal experts to represent her if she IS indicted. They are all lined up already. (Against her)
See 76. “Secret alliance” might be imagination, or mis labeling.
Mueller and Obama were so happy with each other in 2011, that both agreed to apply for a Congressional waiver so that Mueller could extend his FBI term for two additional years past the mandatory 10 year term limit.
Mostly drivel, designed to completely discredit any ACTUAL research into possible conspiracies. It’s the new strategy of the globalist puppet masters, to pollute the entire channel with ridiculous claims so that none of it will be considered likely. And unfortunately, it seems to be working, on all these newly found conspiracy theorists, whose imaginations are just little too wild.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.