Time for Hans and Fritz to take it to the judge.
And thus begins the rise of national socialism again.
Ok, what does the ketters AfD mean? What’s the name?
Coming to the US in 8 years.
The Nazi did the same things. The left-wingers never change.
The last time Germany sought to protect an embattled minority, they made the members of the embattled minority wear armbands and post signs in the windows of their stores. Then, the members of the embattled minority were rounded up, for their own protection of course, and placed in camps. Roosevelt did the same thing with the Japanese in Hawaii and California, only he didn’t pursue a final solution. This is where countries go when they do not defend the rights of each person. Our rights are, as is stated in our Declaration, unalienable, and governments are formed to protect our rights. If there are criminal gangs attacking any of us, the government should break up those gangs and prosecute the members of those gangs, not join in with those gangs. In the pledge of allegiance to the flag, when we say “with liberty and justice for us,” it is not really a statement of fact, it is a commitment we make to each other; i.e., it is a pledge.
How far are we from Jews wearing yellow stars? Though Jews aren’t a target of this, isn’t this the same kind of thing, where certain people are targeted as “undesirables”?
Typical Orwellian Communist logic: it’s his fault that deranged Leftists and Muslims attack him.
So he must be pushed out of his home, not them.
The American courts routinely rejected the violent heckler’s veto, saying that it is the obligation of the government to protect the speaker and punish the violent, not silence speech on fear of violence.
Silencing the speaker - or in this case, labeling and punishing the dissident - shows tolerance for the tactic and results in more of it, while providing justification for violence fascist tactics against those who still dare speak.
Pretty soon the ‘yellow stars of David’ will be trotted out again. It is Germany after all.
This translation is a little garbled. The original German read:
Das Amtsgericht Göttingen gab jetzt einer Anfechtungsklage seiner Vermieterin statt.
A better translation might be:
The local court of Göttingen has now sustained [i.e., ruled in favor of] the landlady's [i.e., the Plaintiff's] action for annulment [i.e., of the original decision].
Regards,
Something is rotten in Germany.
What sort of misguided law is that?
Are Catholics required to divulge their religion because they might attract anti-catholic killers putting the entire building at risk?
Moderate Muslims?
Radical muslims?
Killer Muslims?
How about gays and other perverts?
One of the clearest slippery slopes ever invented... beyond simple fascism--- social as well as economic and political
How do you say “unaffiliated” in German? People will just declare they aren’t political unless they are running.
Dont’cha love it when it’s okay to blame the crime victim when they hold differing political beliefs, but not okay to blame the crime victim when gender is involved?
Liberal logic twists so much it should hurt. But they remain numb to it.
For background, Göttingen has been a hotbed for left extremists for decades. The political power structure is hard left, the judiciary is hard left. Think Portland (Oregon) on the Leine (the river passing through Göttingen). My Alma Mater (physics), but just drop a nuke on it and put it out of its misery...Gauss and Weber, Einstein, Planck, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, Bohr et al...all spending time there in the heydays...would probably agree.