Posted on 10/30/2017 10:01:15 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
BREAKING: US court bars Trump from changing military policy on service by transgender people.
Reel forward a few years:
ISIS DETONATES SMALL NUKE IN SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR
Trump Vows Retribution
Federal Judge Stops Any Retaliation
I still can’t figure out which part of the Constitution gives an “Inferior” court, ordained and established by Congress(created and controlled) separate but equal authority to tell the Executive branch anything.
Can you imagine during World War II, some judge ruling the U.S. military must do this or that?
That’s like saying there is only a tiny bit of raw swage in your drinking water. It’s ok.
Can you imagine a judge ruling Obama was wrong when he ruled they can serve? And Obama sitting back and saying Okie doke I’ll forget about then. This is insanity. The Commander in Chief can do what in the hell he feels like doing when it comes to who can serve and who can’t serve in the Armed Forces of the United States. Trump should ignore the nothing ruling and tell Mattis to get off his ass and enforce the ruling.
Appeal <<
Yup!...but continue the process...its not settled law till it gets to the SC...
The judge who made this illegal decision is an enemy of the state who should be dumped in Guantanamo.
The president is CIC of the Armed Forces,not some liberal judge.
[How do Federal judges get the authority to tell the Commander-In-Chief how the Armed Forces are to be staffed? Do they also claim the authority to order a particular member of the Armed Forces to have a particular assignment? Or to order that a Marine recruit who scored 3 out of 250 while qualifying at the rife range graduate and be assigned to Sniper School? ]
How about picking bombing targets or dictating troop movements and battle plans while they are at it.
She- He - It : acronym = S.H.IT
This judge hopefully will not be taken serious. She has no standing.
they can’t make a ruling like that ...Trump is the president...
There is a very curious early history to Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. She was a classmate, (Catholic University School of Law ‘68). and moot court colleague of Philip Mackin Bailley, the DC lawyer who is connected to Heidi Rikan and Maureen Dean and a call-girl ring that many felt was the true basis for the Watergate break-ins. Phil Bailley made headlines in June 1972 when he was indicted under the Mann act along with other charges. He came before Judge Charles Richey at trial and in a very bizarre, dubious ruling, was ordered by Richey to undergo psychiatric examination at St. Elizabeth’s. Around the time Bailley was committed by court order to St. Elizabeth’s, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly left her job at the Appellate Section of the DOJ Criminal division to become in-house counsel at St. Elizabeth’s. She was probably involved in handling the legal paperwork of her old moot court partner at St. Elizabeth’s. Anyone familiar with the Bailley case understands that it was very dubious, corrupt arrangement between the Judge and outside forces, probably John Dean who had a vested interest in discrediting Bailley.
Before her tenure at St. Elizabeth’s, 1972-84, Kollar-Kotelly worked in the Criminal Division’s Appellate Section of the DOJ. In 1984, Ronald Reagan appointed her to the Federal bench in DC. Presumably she was vetted by John Dean’s friend and former deputy Fred Fielding who somehow became Reagan’s White House Counsel in 1981. Fielding later served as Bush 43’s White House Counsel.
In 1997 her real ideological twin Bill Clinton appointed her to a higher federal judgeship.
Kollar-Kotelly’s husband John was the counsel appointed to handle the Clinton-era Alexis Herman case (no indictments) and he also defended a Secret Service agent during the Lewinsky case.
Phil Bailley was directly connected to Maureen Biner Dean, Spencer Oliver, Ida Maxie Wells, and a “brigade of Young Democrats” and Colleen Kollar-Kotelly.
See books White House Callgirl, Silent Coup, The Strong Man, Secret Agenda.
Watergate was absolutely rife with corrupt judicial rulings, ex parte meetings, biased rulings, tainted jury pools etc.
Therefore, this ruling isn't worth the paper it's printed on.
What a total crock of sh-t. I don't see how the US Supreme Court could ever uphold such a ludicrous decision...
>When the civil war starts, liberal judges are going to be unhappy
They should be unhappy right now. Are there no sons of liberty left?
If the military listens to a judge over Trump. They are in violation of the law.
Fake news
How quickly we have moved from gay rights to crossdressers’ rights.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.