Defeating a NK nuclear attack is not good enough.
Wonder how much the Clintons, the DNC, and the Deep State would pay NK to attack in an effort to distract from their crimes in hopes they won’t end up in jail.
Well rocket boy ... you have to ask yourself one question ... you are dealing with a nation that will rip your head off and feed it to the dogs ... do you feel lucky rocket boy ... well ... do ya
07:24:55 AM
Good Morning Christians and Jews who are Ezekiel 37:1-14 qualified Jews, who are currently serving or are honorably discharged veterans,
Both the oath taken by officers and that taken by enlisted include this line:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic …
Defining foreign enemies is pretty easy, but defining domestic enemies, not so. Why is that, why is it easy to identify foreign enemies but near impossible to define domestic enemies? Yet those at the top of the chain of command don't seem willing to take the gloves off and fight either of those enemies to win.
An example would be this, say a person is coming across our border, entering our country from Mexico who is armed and carrying drugs, we know he is a foreign enemy, yet, he or she is treated like a tourist that went astray. But at least our govt does attempt to stop he or she.
BUT, what about the domestic enemy? First who is a domestic enemy? What does the term 'domestic enemy' mean in our oath? Just who is the 'domestic enemy'?
Let's start by looking at the oath taken in 1778:
"I, _____ do acknowledge the United States of America to be free, independent and sovereign states, and declare that the people thereof owe no allegiance or obedience, to George the third, king of Great Britain; and I renounce, refuse and abjure any allegiance or obedience to him: and I do swear (or affirm) that I will, to the utmost of my power, support, maintain and defend the said United States, against the said king George the third and his heirs and successors, and his and their abettors, assistants and adherents, and will serve the said United States in the office of _____ which I now hold, with fidelity, according to the best of my skill and understanding. So help me God."
Let's relook at one part, for it tells us who these domestic enemies are, “That I will, to the utmost of my power, support, maintain and defend the said United States, against the said king George the third and his heirs and successors, and his and their abettors, assistants and adherents”
So, folks 'domestic enemies' in our oath, the oath that has no ending date, are those who through their actions or though their votes, serve our enemies.
Do I need to say more?
If we are against nuclear power, why enable others to get it? Why sell off our own raw materials and tech for it?