Posted on 10/27/2017 5:35:19 PM PDT by Enlightened1
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/924064610038272000
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
So there will still be some cover up.
I understand if there on going operations that could be jeopardize or methods used by the CIA, but this was almost 54 years ago!
Sorry , cannot understand the significance of what is in the released documents that kept them sealed for so long.
He must have watched Lou Dobbs tonight.
What did Lou say?
Release all docs
This will be verrrrrry interesting.
Now accepting “You were right” accolades from all the FReepers who didn’t believe me when I said that President Trump had not spoken his last word on this yet.
OK, now he has. Bitcoin accepted.
What's needed in addition would be transcripts of any and all closed-door meetings held at the Capitol, the FBI HQ and Langley where our masters decided which documents to keep sealed for 50+ years for "national security" reasons.
It's in the public interest to know exactly how these deep-state minds click.
These people presumably work for us, right?
Are the Bush’s are worried....
Bookmark
The only reason to hide info would be to keep secret our intel sources & methods, including those that are still running - wherever they may be.
Bush family better get hold of some opioids
Dunno yet whether that's good or bad; I mean, the assassination was back in 1963, whoever was alive back then is now 54 years old(er).
The interesting thing was that JFK shot himself.
He was handling a gun when it went off and he killed himself with a ricochet. The conspiracy in all these years was in covering this fact up.
If he was alive, Oswald would only be 78.
And how many times does one have to say some of these documents are from the ‘70s and even ‘90s? I saw even one document that was about Bill Ayers and I don’t know if anything in it was about the JFK assassination.
so what if a source is a 80+ year old in a retirement home that happens to be in the kremlin. I myself would not want to identify the person because being a source might open him to legal jeopardy and charges of treason....
That’s what I was thinking. Old George H W Bush might be?
Well, for one, Oswald was “trained by this agency” to be a CIA agent. Forth document down:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.