Posted on 10/22/2017 9:47:54 AM PDT by Kaslin
The war on drugs has been going on since 1971, and we have a winner: marijuana. Back then, possession of pot carried heavy penalties in many states -- even life imprisonment. Today, 29 states sanction medical use of cannabis, and eight allow recreational use. Legal weed has become about as controversial as Powerball.
One sign of the shift came in Wednesday's debate among the Democrats running for governor of Illinois. The state didn't get its first medical marijuana dispensary until 2015, and it decriminalized possession of small amounts of pot only last year. But most of the candidates endorsed legalization of recreational weed, and one supported "full decriminalization."
Those positions are not politically risky, in Illinois or most places. They're mainstream.
In 2016, Gallup Poll found that 60 percent of Americans supported full legalization -- up from 36 percent in 2005. Given the choice, voters generally favor it. Nine states had cannabis initiatives on the ballot last year. Medical marijuana won in four states, and recreational pot won in another four. Only Arizona's recreational pot measure failed.
Next year should further erode pot prohibition. "Campaigns are underway in at least five states to legalize either medical or recreational cannabis," reports Marijuana Business Daily. It also notes that New Jersey, Rhode Island and Vermont could get recreational cannabis through legislative action.
All this progress has occurred even though federal law bars possession and use -- impeding normal commerce in states that permit dispensaries. Under President Barack Obama, the Justice Department chose to defer to states that allowed cannabis. But banks generally are leery of doing business with pot dispensaries, forcing many to operate on cash alone.
s a candidate, Donald Trump indicated he would follow more or less the same course as Obama. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, however, has been an implacable opponent of liberalization. He once joked -- well, I assume he was joking -- that he had no problem with the Ku Klux Klan until he "found out they smoked pot."
He appointed a task force on crime, hoping it would confirm his preposterous claim that Obama's laissez-faire policy was to blame for rising violence. But the panel report, which has not been made public, recommended sticking with that approach.
The case for full legalization becomes stronger all the time. One reason is that the disproportionate impact on African-Americans has gained more attention. Blacks are nearly four times likelier to be arrested for pot possession than whites even though there is no racial difference in usage.
Drug enforcement has been a major motive for stop-and-frisk tactics that have fostered resentment of cops among black men. Treating cannabis like beer or cigarettes would greatly curtail such encounters.
For years, opponents said legalization would lead to disaster. But as Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. noted, "A page of history is worth a volume of logic." We no longer have to rely on ominous forecasts. We now have actual experience in states that have taken the leap, and the results refute the fears.
Studies show that after Colorado permitted recreational pot, there was no increase in adolescent use or traffic fatalities. In Washington, which voted for legalization in 2012, crime rates proceeded to decline. California found that when medical dispensaries closed, neighborhood crime didn't fall; it rose.
This year, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine found "substantial evidence that cannabis is an effective treatment for chronic pain in adults." That helps explain why states that allow cannabis have far lower rates of opioid overdoses. The simple reality is that marijuana eases suffering and saves lives.
States with fiscal problems -- Illinois being a prominent example -- also stand to gain from allowing recreational pot. First, they don't have to spend so much money arresting, trying and incarcerating users and sellers. Second, they get a windfall from taxing a product that previously sold only on the black market. Washington's cannabis taxes bring in about $250 million a year.
State governments can also expect savings in Medicaid and other health care programs as some patients opt for inexpensive cannabis over pricey prescription drugs. There are also financial savings for ambulances, hospitals and morgues when fewer people overdose with opioids -- not to mention a lower toll in human misery and heartache.
It's too late to undo all the harm produced by the war on drugs. But Americans are realizing it's never too late to enjoy the benefits of peace.
What lies are you referring to? Are you claiming that all medical researchers are liars?
The majority of Florida voters who voted for medical marijuana most likely were informed citizens...
Thanks for confirming what I have said about the efforts of NORML. And also for confirming my observation that stoners are in a complete state of denial about the dangers of marijuana use. It's pretty much a given for any substance abuse... the abusers always believe there is no harm from their addictions...
We probably see eye to eye on that. Politics is evil and there just isn’t anything for Christians to win by playing the game.
Thanks for [...] confirming my observation that stoners are in a complete state of denial about the dangers of marijuana use.
What a screaming non sequitir.
“Are you claiming that all medical researchers are liars?”
No, just prohibitionists.
“Thanks for confirming what I have said about the efforts of NORML.”
Another fallacy. Keep ‘em coming.
“And also for confirming my observation that stoners are in a complete state of denial about the dangers of marijuana use.”
Another logical fallacy. Being a medical marijuana patient does not = being a stoner anymore than drinking a beer after dinner = being an alcoholic.
“They say the government has no business trying to regulate pot.”
False. The major theme of the successful ballot intiatives was “regulate like alcohol”.
That's a pity, cause weed is wack, yo.
I never saw tha attraction and I never will.
the. Autocorrect?
That’s right.
Well said, Sargon.
Re: “Blacks are nearly four times likelier to be arrested for pot possession than whites...”
Two important reasons for that.
First, Blacks are much more likely to be dealing marijuana than white guys.
Second, almost nobody gets arrested for possession of user amounts, unless they are on probation, or possess it in jail, or unless another more serious crime has also been committed.
Also, possession of marijuana is the number one plea down when prosecutors decide to drop other more serious charges.
Since Blacks break the law much more often than whites, Blacks accept a lot more plea deals.
I grew up in the hotel business in south Florida. Forty years ago, on the beach, I saw cops on multiple occasions make people empty small bags of reefer on the street or flush it down the toilet in hotel rooms. I never saw anybody get arrested for user amounts, and I never knew anybody who got arrested for user amounts.
No. In truth, you’re an idiot.
The reason you don’t debate, is because you can’t support your point without lobbing false and absurd accusations.
Not everyone who opposes having the nanny state regulate their lives is a stoner, but every person who does advocate for the government regulating all facets of OTHER PEOPLES BEHAVIOR is a short sighted non-thinker.
You failed to notice that my original post to this thread didn’t have anything to do with supporting legalized pot. It simply opposes the type of thinking that demands government regulations to solve every problem people face.
Undeterred by this simple fact, you decide to pop up like some demented gopher from your hole and tell *me* what I think; then run away like a coward with a flippant “I don’t debate stoners”...
It would be funny if it weren’t so pathetic.
There’s a saying about trying to use reason and logic to argue with a stupid person:
“Never play chess with a pigeon.
The pigeon just knocks all the pieces over.
Then shits all over the board.
Then struts around like it won.”
So you are in favor of legalized heroin. Got it.
Strut, pigeon.
You can’t clarify your position so you call me names. Exactly how I said it would happen
Druggies always say the government has no business controlling drugs but then then they call me names when I ask if heroin should be legal.
"call me names when I ask if heroin should be legal."You didn't ask any such thing, you liar.
Should heroin be legal?
Yes, for doctor supervised use in opioid replacement therapy (to help people recover from prescription drug dependencies), or in end-stage cancer treatment, but not in most other situations...
What about OxyContin? Should it be illegal? Or should only the BEHAVIOR of abusing the drug be criminalized?
How about sticking a Q-tip into your ear canal? That shit is dangerous. It even says so right on the box.
Should Q-tips be illegal?
Or should we simply pass a law against putting them in your ear canal?
Or are you smart enough to not self-harm?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.