Posted on 10/17/2017 10:28:12 AM PDT by jazusamo
Senate Democrats are planning an amendment to stop the GOP from using the budget process to more easily allow oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).
Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) and a handful of others told reporters Tuesday that they’re working on how exactly to fight the ANWR provision in the budget, and to bring on Republicans to oppose it as well.
“We’re going to work together with our colleagues to determine just the right moment in this budgetary process to make this amendment,” Markey said outside the Capitol. “But we are going to do so, and we are reaching out to Republicans to try to make this as bipartisan as we can. It should be a bipartisan issue.”
Markey called the ANWR provision “heartless,” “a budgetary scam” and “nothing more than a Big Oil polar payout.”
“This is exactly the kind of polarizing politics we need to get away from — giveaways to big oil and billionaires at the expense of the American people and our planet,” he said.
Sen. Maria Cantwell (Wash.), the top Democrat on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, criticized the GOP for using the opaque budget process to push ANWR drilling.
“It tells you something that this idea does not stand on its own. It tells you that every time it has to be paired with something else as almost a sneak attack, you have to vote for this because of these other issues,” she said.
“When are they going to stop holding us all hostage to vote for the Arctic Wildlife Refuge being opened, when in reality, oil companies today aren’t even interested in drilling there at this price?”
The Senate is voting on its budget this week, which is meant to set high-level funding limits for the government, though it does not actually set the funding amounts.
The legislation, as proposed by the GOP, would ask the Energy and Natural Resources Committee to pass legislation to raise $1 billion over the next 10 years.
Although it does not mention the federally owned wildlife refuge specifically, government revenue from ANWR drilling is by far the most likely way to get to the $1 billion total.
And since it would be in the budget, a drilling bill would only require a 51-vote majority, an easier climb for the GOP then the 60 votes needed for most legislation.
“What’s happening here is an effort that they know will not withstand the light of day,” said Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) “That’s why they put it on this budget bill, that’s why they’re trying to do it in middle of the night.”
Drilling supporters have not conceded that the $1 billion ask in the budget is meant for ANWR.
“I don’t think it’s an ANWR provision. It’s just producing more energy for America. I would find that remarkable that anyone would not want to produce more energy for America,” said Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska).
“Who would be against energy for America? That could be for for renewables. Is [Minnesota Sen. Al] Franken, Markey, against renewables? You guys should ask them that question,” he said. The Energy Committee would be able to reach the $1 billion through any legislation within its purview, not just opening ANWR.
Nonetheless, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), chairwoman of the Energy Committee and a longtime supporter of ANWR drilling, supports the budget as proposed.
“My goal is to make sure that those instructions get through the process,” she said of the provision.
Congress created the refuge in 1977. It left the possibility open for drilling in a small area on the coast, though lawmakers reserved the right to make a decision on drilling there to themselves, and it has often cropped up as a political controversy since then.
Cry me a river. Sen. Malarkey along with other Dems have been in the pockets of the enviro-nazis forever and ignore that provision in the original bill.
Did they call ANWR “pristine”??
I recall previous debates on this issue, where liberal after liberal trotted out and declared that the “pristine” Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should be off limits.
Which reminds us all how talking points are handed out, and how the Journolist people are still at it, behind the scenes.
ANWR is about as big as SC. Where they want to drill is about as big as JFK Airport.
Yep, that’s the favorite buzzword of the Rats when they argue about ANWR and we can bet that they’ll use it when they act on this.
Alaska Ping
Drill Baby, Drill
BUMP! :)
Senate Dems were/are happy to let Eni drill, IIRC....
There is nothing pristine about Alaska. Evidence of human occupation, enterprise and exploitation is everywhere. It just looks pristine compared to the crowded and filthy lower 48.
Obama’s Offshore Drilling Ban Is ‘Largely Symbolic,’ at Least for Now
ANWR gets a mention.
And the ‘Rats haven’t been having a cow about off shore drilling, some of it pretty darn close to shore.
Democrats don’t care about energy independence or jobs.
I imagine that Democrats who watch Gold Rush must need heavy Medication while viewing it.
Bulldozers tearing apart pristine Mother Earth to get to the Evil Gold. Heartless Miners making Millions. Tony B cussing.
It must be hell on earth.
Stop polar bears from killing baby seals!
DRILL BABY DRILL. There is nothing up there anyway.
Oh No!
Trump The Monster wants to poke holes in Mother Gaia!
Most people think the opposite of Progress is Regress. Not so! The opposite of Progress is CONGRESS!
I would sell 1,000 year transferable leases to the entire national reserve while we have the power to do so!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
