Posted on 10/13/2017 1:34:44 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
Clinton Dismisses Sexual Misconduct Claims Against Her Husband as Already Litigated
BY: David Rutz October 13, 2017 4:00 pm
Hillary Clinton on Friday dismissed claims of sexual misconduct made against her husband Bill Clinton as "litigated" and "clearly in the past" while panning Donald Trump as an admitted "sexual assaulter."
The issue arose during an interview with the BBC, where Clinton addressed the sexual abuse and harassment claims being made against Harvey Weinstein, a longtime Democratic bundler and donor, the Daily Caller reported .
"I was shocked and appalled It was just disgusting and the stories that have come out are heartbreaking," Clinton said. "And I really commend the women who have been willing to step forward now and tell their stories."
Clinton added it was important to not just focus on him but also recognize such behavior wasn't acceptable anywhere.
"After all, we have someone admitting to being a sexual assaulter in the Oval Office," she said in reference to Trump. "There has to be a recognition that we must stand against this kind of action that is so sexist and misogynistic."
The BBC's Andrew Marr asked Clinton about the town hall debate last year where Trump invited Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones, and Kathleen Willey to attend; all three women have accused her husband of various forms of sexual abuse or harassment. Broaddrick has long alleged the former president raped her in 1978.
Marr noted Clinton "dismissed" them in her book What Happened about the 2016 campaign, asking if that was a wise course of action.
"Well, yes, because that all been litigated," Clinton said. That was the subject of a huge investigation
in the late '90s, and there were conclusions drawn, and that was clearly in the past.
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...
Please make her shut up!
Good point.
It’s a wonder Bill Clinton doesn’t just shut her up already!
Nope. Ask Juanita Broadrrick about that one.
The sooner this evil scag goes totally insane and self-destructs, the better off the world will be.
Such a stalwart defense of Bill by his loving spouse...
Yes, such words of heartfelt tender love.
Will she give him a Valentine’s Day cake with “Already Litigated” icing?
well... it’s been litigated... that makes it a-o-k in Hillaries eyes.
wait.. I thought Weinstein had “litigated” many of his assaults also...
I am so confused.
One of the smartest moves President Trump did during the campaign was to bring Bubba's rape victims to the debate. Bubba glared and was obviously very uneasy, but that move effective removed him from Madam Benghazi's public campaign.
Why isn’t this slovenly fatso, malodorous, alcoholic, psychopathic, liar, criminal and traitor in prison for her many crimes?. Her crimes are obvious except to LIB lunatics and Deep Staters. This subhuman waste of air daily is proving how worthless she is. Bless her little heart.
Good lord, she’s wearing that in public? Tart.
She means I already trashed those bimbos
Delusion runs deep
Thank very much!
Yeah ... However, do all her orifi HAVE to be sooo gaseous and stink so outrageously?
She has a lot of audacity. It shows the same “tone deafness,” as her inability or unwillingness to grasp the reasons for her loss.
“Good lord, shes wearing that in public? Tart.”
Heh. I wonder if it’s s Donna (”Askinforit”) Karan.
What bothers me as much as anything Clinton did, is these women with gaga eyes when he came near.
I’ve seen a number of what I would call beautiful women who seemed to be ready if only he would ask.
What the hell folks? If you asked these women if they wanted to have relations with a rapist, they’d tell you 100% of the time no. Then Bill walks by and it’s unmistakable they’re jonesing for the guy.
It’s enough to make a decent man scratch his head, and think, “What the hell? Why do I bother?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.