Wonder what it said about them.
I would think that a program that analyzed speech patterns would be more accurate.
They were trying to find more potential hookups.
Recruit
Recruit
Recruit
>>I would think that a program that analyzed speech patterns would be more accurate.
Those speech patterns are cultural, not genetic.
It’s a “sign” they flirt with each other, hoping that straight people don’t pick up on it.
“I would think that a program that analyzed speech patterns would be more accurate. “
Not even speech patterns; word choice. “Fabulous!”
Queer oozes.
I think you are right. I think it would be applicable to men, mostly, don't you?
When I started seeing reports of this research, I also was impressed to ask, "Why focus on faces? It's the hands that tell the tale -- true not only of the soft, limp handshake, but also of gestures."
Nobody is more convinced that they can accurately identify homosexuals than other homosexuals. Probably gay groups are concerned that it will be used to screen out gays.
“When an algorithm with 91 percent accuracy operates in the real world,” Dr. Cox said, “almost two-thirds of the times it says someone is gay, it would be wrong.”
In other words, even with the machine, "gaydar" isn't always on target.
Wonder what it said about them.
In my consciousness research I can easily tell if a person’s gender identity has shifted. While this increases the probability of being gay, it is not 100% as being gay is an intellectual decision.
If a man is feminine and straight, he will just find a masculine female as a partner.
watery eyes and mom’s or grandma’s facial expressions
most are very effeminate males,, not too hard to spot with the accent and all . .
That must be one, slick algorithm to try to program!
(Or not...)
Isaiah 3:9 The look on their faces testifies against them; they parade their sin like Sodom; they do not hide it.
Woe to them! They have brought disaster upon themselves.
Just for talking purposes check the alignment of the ears and eyes on known gays. The hypothesis is that low ears in relationship to the horizontal line from the eye to the back of the head indicate the propensity.
My wife’s gaydar is 99% accurate.
If it has a limp wrist, talks with a fake lisp, wears plaid dress shirts, wears purple, uses hair products, or has other homosexual identifying traits, it’s a homosexual wearing identifying traits.
MIT scientists tried Pavlovian theory in creating a Homo testing machine.
They were able to get cooperation from some public figures in testing the machine.
Shepard Smith allowed himself to be strapped into the gay testing chair and electrodes attached.
They showed Sheo images of beautiful women in various stages of undress.
There was one faint ring of the bell, a picture of Miss America contestants and the male MC.
Richard Simmons tested a little better.
Then Anderson Cooper. Zip.
Male models, actors, newsmen and a number of others, all with various results.
BaracK Obama took the chair. Nothing. Absolute flat-line.
“Thank you Mr. President. You can go join the others.”
Ding ding ding ding ding Ding ding ding ding ding Ding ding ding ding ding Ding ding ding ding ding
Can they program it to detect terrorist and or murderers?
Rapist?
RINOs?
Given both GLAAD and the “Human Rights Campaign” (HRC) have both celebrated others being outed against their will, their protesting a “gaydar” machine seems pretty hypocritical I think....
And yet, they do this all the time.
The classification algorithm would probably perform even better with voice recordings than with photos.
Not all homosexuals are the “effeminate” type. One usually has the male role .
Who , outside of Hollywood had Rock Hudson as a queer.
I still can’t watch Ice Station Zebra without making snide jokes about “submarines” and Seamen”
Look at the annual Sodom and Gomorrah festivals at San Francisco.
Lots of leather biker types that never rode a Harley(unless his name was Harley.)
Stereotypes, ya’ll. Stereotypes.